1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol 56 (2024) Issue 1
  4. Articles

Circular Economy Approaches in the Palm Oil Industry: Enhancing Profitability through Waste Reduction and Product Diversification

Abstract

Today, facing difficult environmental and sustainability questions, the palm oil industry is an important force in global trade and development. As a transformative solution to these problems, this review assesses the implementation of circular economy (CE) strategies. CE principles promote the transformation of waste into value through recycling, upcycling and other low-carbon innovation applications. This review estimates the capability of palm-based biomass, including palm oil mill effluent (POME) and refinery wastes. It evaluates how different technologies such as gasification are used to change these fuel sources into energy fuels and value-added products for industry. It also involves incorporating Industry 4.0 to boost efficiency and waste value creation into the operation. Although the potential of CE in creating an eco-friendly, profitable palm oil industry is apparent, nevertheless it must overcome all kinds and levels of barriers – from economic to technological to social. This review points out for collaborative efforts, technological advancement, and supportive policies to navigate these challenges, advocating for a unified shift towards sustainability and efficiency in the palm oil sector.

Keywords

Introduction

The palm oil industry, as a critical driver of economic growth and development, significantly contributes to global trade and the livelihoods of millions. Indonesia, as a leading producer, exemplifies this industry's vast scale, with an output of approximately 45 million metric tons annually (Figure 1(a)). Its versatile applications in various sectors like food, cosmetics, and biofuels underscore palm oil's ubiquitous presence in global commerce [1-4]. This widespread utility is matched by a growing number of publications, which has expanded exponentially, indicating a robust and sustained interest in the commodity and its associated technologies (Figure 1(b)).

However, in conjunction with its economic strength, the palm oil sector encounters substantial environmental and sustainability obstacles. Concerns such as deforestation, the loss of biodiversity, and the discharge of greenhouse gases have instigated a pressing demand for more sustainable methodologies [5]. The industry's traditionally linear model of production, characterized by extensive extraction of raw materials and significant generation of waste, further exacerbates these challenges. In response to these apprehensions, there has been a noticeable shift in research focus towards sustainability and the effective utilization of palm oil waste or byproducts (Figure 1(c)).

The model of the circular economy offers a revolutionary framework to directly confront these challenges. By endorsing the reduction, reuse, recycling, and regeneration of resources, the circular economy strives to detach economic growth from the consumption of resources and the deterioration of the environment [6-8]. The utilization of this method is not solely a tactical reaction to the ecological predicaments linked with the manufacture of palm oil, but also a chance to bolster economic endurance and societal inclusiveness within the sector [9-11].

Copyright ©2024 Published by IRCS - ITB J. Eng. Technol. Sci. Vol. 56, No. 1, 2024, 25-49 ISSN: 2337-5779 DOI: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2023.56.1.3

Despite the possible advantages, the process of transitioning towards a circular economy within the palm oil sector is characterized by intricate complications. The industry generates substantial amounts of biomass, effluent, and waste, historically regarded as disposable rather than valuable assets. Recent developments have initiated the exploration of the potential presented by palm-based biomass, palm oil mill effluent (POME), and refinery wastes, aiming to convert them into products and energy that possess added value [12-14]. This transition not only holds the promise of relieving environmental burdens, but also of fostering innovation and profitability within the industry [10, 15]. However, realizing the full potential of these waste streams requires overcoming significant technological, logistical, and economic hurdles.

3

Figure 1 Palm oil production and publications related to palm oil. (a) Palm oil production by country (data source: http://www.worldagriculturalproduction.com/crops/palmoil.aspx). (b) Number of publication per year and by country (data obtained from SCOPUS, 6 September 2023). (c) keyword network generated by using VOSViewer (keywords source: SCOPUS).

The application of Industry 4.0 technologies is pivotal in addressing these challenges. By integrating smart technologies, data analytics, and automation, the palm oil industry can enhance operational efficiency, reduce waste, and improve the valorization of by-products [16, 17]. However, integrating these advanced technologies into a coherent circular economy framework remains an ongoing challenge, particularly in balancing the priorities of energy efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and sustainable production [18-20].

Figure 1(c) visualizes the complex network of research themes related to the palm oil industry. It illustrates the diverse and evolving areas of focus, from technical aspects like biodiesel production and effluent treatment to broader themes encompassing sustainable development and renewable energies. This network analysis not only highlights the current state of research but also sheds light on emerging trends and potential future directions (Figure 1(c)).

This review explores the fundamental concepts underlying the circular economy and their essential implementation in the palm oil sector. It conducts an examination of waste generation throughout the entire value chain, while also investigating strategic approaches designed to minimize waste production and enhance sustainability. Furthermore, it discusses the potential for converting palm oil by-products into value-added goods, thus contributing to diversification and increased profitability. Additionally, it highlights the role of technological advancements in facilitating circular economy practices. Through the analysis of successful case studies and the exploration of challenges and obstacles, this paper aims to inspire collaborative efforts towards establishing a palm oil sector that is both sustainable and economically viable, while also being environmentally responsible. This comprehensive analysis makes a significant contribution to the wider discourse on sustainable development and responsible business practices, emphasizing the importance of innovative strategies and technologies in ensuring the long-term sustainability and profitability of the industry.

CE Principles and their Relevance to the Palm Oil Industry

CE signifies a fundamental change in the way resources are managed, endorsing a sustainable methodology that aims to establish a closed-loop system in order to optimize the value of products, materials, and resources while minimizing the generation of waste. This transformative approach is distinguished by a number of fundamental principles, which encompass the design of products for prolonged usage, the optimization of resource utilization, the reduction of waste, the encouragement of sharing and collaborative consumption, the extension of product lifespan, and the closure of the loop through recycling and recovery [21-23]. The palm oil industry is increasingly embracing these principles as it grapples with environmental obstacles and explores opportunities to improve its profitability (Table 1).

Biorefineries are being recognized as an imperative constituent within the circular economy of the palm oil sector, facilitating the conversion of biomass waste into diverse bio-products. This conversion mechanism assists in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions resulting from waste decomposition, all the while fostering energy preservation and effectiveness, thus aligning with the circular economy's objective of diminishing energy consumption [10, 24]. The industry's transition towards the development of value-enhanced commodities, such as biodiesel and bioethanol derived from the byproducts of palm oil, serves as a notable demonstration of the practical implementation of circular economy principles. This approach advocates for a self-sustaining system that not only stimulates economic advancement but also facilitates the preservation of the environment [25, 26]. This approach is supported by models and indicators designed to assess the sustainability and economic viability of circular economy practices, highlighting the potential for cost savings and emission reductions [27].

The core principle that underpins the circular economy's significance in the palm oil sector is the notion of waste valorization. This involves the treatment of by-products such as biomass, POME, and refinery wastes not merely as waste, but as valuable resources (Table 1). This particular perspective promotes the development of additional revenue streams by incorporating palm-based biomass into various industries such as paper, polymer, and furniture. The integration of these components establishes a closed-loop system, thereby substantially reducing the amount of waste sent to landfills, limiting emissions, and generating economic value. Ultimately, this process transforms waste into a form of wealth [15].

Furthermore, the adoption of advanced technologies like microwave-assisted processes for converting oil palm waste into bioenergy exemplifies the innovative application of circular economy principles towards more sustainable practices [28, 29]. For example, Abas et al., investigated the microwave-assisted optimization of pyrolysis liquid oil (PLO) production from oil palm fiber, focusing on maximizing liquid oil yield and total phenolic content concentration, important for biomedical applications such as antioxidants and antimicrobial agents [30]. Through response surface methodology and central composite design, they found significant effects of final temperature and AC loading on PLO yield and total phenolic content concentration, with the highest PLO yield at 40.66 wt% and total phenolic content concentration at 26.61±0.96 mg gallic acid/g under optimal conditions.

Integrating the technologies of Industry 4.0 within the circular economy framework is of utmost importance for effectively tackling the operational and sustainability obstacles faced by the palm oil industry. The automation, real-time data processing, and connectivity play a crucial role in augmenting the efficiency of palm oil production and facilitating the shift towards a circular economy [16, 18-20].

The successful execution of circular economy principles within the palm oil sector requires an inclusive approach that encompasses the entirety of the supply chain. This comprehensive strategy entails the development of policies, regulations, technological advancements, and analysis of market behavior. Such a holistic approach is crucial in guiding the industry towards a bio-circular-green economy model that effectively balances sustainability and economic expansion [31]. By adopting circular economy principles, the palm oil industry can mitigate its environmental impact while maximizing its economic benefits, marking a significant step towards sustainable production and consumption.

PrincipleDescriptionRefs.
Optimize resource useImplement efficient production processes to minimize water, energy, and
material consumption throughout the palm oil production chain.
Reduce wasteMinimize waste generation during palm oil production and processing
through improved practices and technologies.
[21-23]
Promote sharing and
collaboration
Encourage collaborative consumption models, such as shared
transportation or platforms for exchanging palm oil by-products, to reduce
individual resource usage.
[21-23]
Extend product lifeImplement repair, refurbishment, and remanufacturing programs to extend
the useful life of palm oil products before disposal.
[21-23]
Close the LoopRecover and recycle palm oil waste, including biomass, POME, and refinery
wastes, for new uses and product creation.
[15, 21-23]
Waste valorizationTreat palm oil by-products not as waste but as valuable resources with
potential for generating new revenue streams and products.
[15, 21-23]
BiorefineriesUtilize biorefineries to convert palm oil waste into bio-products like
biodiesel, bioethanol, and biomaterials, reducing waste and creating value
added products.
[10-24]
[25, 26]
CE assessmentUtilize models and indicators to evaluate the sustainability and economic
viability of circular practices in the palm oil industry, promoting informed
decision-making.
[27]
Holistic supply chain
approach
Develop comprehensive strategies encompassing policy, regulation,
technology, and market analysis to integrate circular principles across the
entire palm oil supply chain.
[31]
Industry 4.0 integrationLeverage automation, real-time data processing, and connectivity to
optimize palm oil production, track resource use, and facilitate transition to
circular practices.
[16, 18-20]

Table 1 CE principles for palm oil industry.

Waste Generation and Management in the Palm Oil Value Chain

The comprehensive value chain of the palm oil industry entails a sequence of intricate and interrelated procedures that convert gathered oil palm fruit into a diverse range of consumer and industrial goods [32, 33]. Comprehending the complexities inherent in these operations is of utmost importance when it comes to tackling the obstacles linked to the production and control of waste within the sector.

In the palm oil industry, the production process commences in extensive plantations, wherein oil palm trees are cultivated to yield clusters of fruit bunches, abundant in oil-rich mesocarp, palm kernels, and fiber. Upon achieving maturity, typically every 3 to 4 years, these bunches are harvested and conveyed to mills for subsequent processing [34, 35]. At the mills, the fruit bunches undergo sterilization, threshing, and extraction, a series of processes critical for separating crude palm oil (CPO) and palm kernel oil (PKO) from the biomass. This stage of CPO production, as depicted in Figure 2(a), is particularly significant as it generates the majority of solid and liquid waste in the industry, including POME [36, 37].

After the extraction process, the CPO goes through a series of refining procedures to improve its overall quality for various purposes, ranging from consumption to industrial applications. These refining stages, consisting of degumming, neutralization, bleaching, and deodorization, additionally contribute to the waste stream by generating extra effluents that necessitate meticulous treatment to minimize their environmental influence [38- 42]. In the comprehensive production process, it is observed that for each ton of CPO produced, around 5 tons of solid biomass waste is generated. This waste, which includes Empty Fruit Bunches (EFB), palm kernel shells (PKS), palm mesocarp fibers (PMF), and POME, not only serves as a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, but also poses a missed opportunity for economic benefit if not utilized efficiently for bio-based products, as depicted in Figure 2(b) [43].

4

Figure 2 Palm oil milling plant and residues and utilization. (a) Palm oil milling plant processes. Reprinted from [44]. (b) Palm biomass residue generated from oil palm plantation (reprinted from [43], under a creative common license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).

Across these stages, the industry generates various types of waste, including EFB, POME, PKS, and fibers. EFB, a substantial by-product, presents disposal and land use challenges [45, 46]. POME, a particularly polluting liquid

waste stream, is characterized by high BOD and COD levels, making it a significant environmental concern if not properly managed. Typical POME characteristics include BOD values between 31,000 and 34,000 mg/L, COD values between 62,000 and 67,000 mg/L, suspended solids between 20,500 and 24,000 mg/L, and a typical pH range of 4.2 to 5.1 [47-49] (also see Table 2). Kernel shells and fiber, while potential sources of biomass energy, require proper technology and handling for efficient utilization [50-52]. Additionally, decanter cake and sludge, by-products of the oil extraction and clarification process, contain residual oil and solids, necessitating effective treatment strategies [53].

Effluent treatment facilities assume a pivotal function in the management and remediation of the aqueous byproduct originating from both palm oil mills and refineries, thereby reducing the ecological repercussions of waste expulsion, and safeguarding the ecosystems [54-56]. Nevertheless, there are ongoing difficulties. It is imperative to incorporate efficient waste reduction and circular economy techniques into the industry's operational procedures to optimize resource utilization and minimize disposal. The objective of the circular economy approach is to convert waste into valuable resources, thus establishing a self-sustaining system that is consistent with overarching sustainability objectives [57, 58]

BOD (g/L)COD (g/L)Total solids (g/L)TSS (g/L)pHOil and grease (g/L)Ref.
31-3462-67-20.5-24.04.2-5.11.8-2.1[49]
34.475.9-14.54.740.19[59]
10.3-43.815-100-5-543.4-5.20.13-18[12]
0.30.9-0.46.2-[60]
-68.8-74.743.4-48.0-4.514.1-18[61]
63.3-83.575-200-8.3-583.3-4.84.0-5.8[62]
32.954.333.125.2-5.9[63]
22.0–54.375.2–96.335.0–42.08.5–12.0-8.3–10.6[64]
-52.936.72.42.8–3.1-[65]

Table 2 Palm oil mill effluent characteristics.

BOD – biological oxygen demand; COD – chemical oxygen demand.

CE Strategies for Waste Reduction in the Palm Oil Industry

CE strategies play an increasingly crucial role in mitigating waste and enhancing the sustainability of the palm oil industry [66-68]. At the core of these strategies is the transformation of waste streams into valuable resources, optimizing processes to reduce environmental impact, and aligning industry practices with broader sustainability goals [69, 70]. Efficient harvesting and processing, pivotal in minimizing waste generation, involve selective harvesting methods that target only ripe fruit bunches, reducing unproductive harvest and minimizing the volume of EFB generated [71, 72]. Enhanced oil extraction techniques reduce residual oil in by-products, while precision agriculture ensures targeted resource application, minimizing unnecessary input usage [73, 74]. Integrated pest management reduces reliance on chemical pesticides, contributing to a healthier environment [75, 76].

Waste repurposing and upcycling initiatives are key to transforming waste materials into valuable resources. Anaerobic digestion converts POME into biogas, a renewable energy source powering mill operation, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and contributing to renewable energy production [77, 78]. Studies have demonstrated the economic viability of converting POME to biogas, with one showing potential to produce 21,195,909.76 kWh/year of electrical energy from methane gas, demonstrating substantial economic potential and environmental benefits [79]. Optimization techniques have enhanced COD removal and biogas production, indicating the economic and environmental feasibility of these processes [63].

In addition to biogas production, other waste materials from the palm oil industry offer potential for resource recovery and valorization. Composting EFB results in nutrient-rich organic fertilizers, enhancing soil fertility and reducing reliance on chemical fertilizers [80, 81]. Studies have explored increasing the nutritional content of EFB compost with various amendments, showing the potential of these bio-based products to contribute to sustainable agriculture [82, 83].

For instance, Yong et al.'s study focused on optimizing biogas production from POME by identifying and optimizing critical parameters affecting methane yield and COD removal [84]. The study utilized comparative analysis and response surface methodology to analyze historical data from three commercial POME-based biogas plants in Malaysia. The researchers identified organic loading rate (OLR) as the most critical factor for methane yield (Figure 3(a)). They determined that the optimal conditions for maximum methane production were an OLR of 1.23 kg/m³·day, inlet total solids (TS) of 46,370 mg/L, pH of 4.5, and temperature of 45.4℃. Under these conditions, the study reported a 39.6% increase in methane yield, achieving 0.335 m³ CH₄/kg COD removed, and a 1.1% increase in COD removal efficiency, achieving 93.4%. Suksaroj et al., studied the codigestion of oil palm EFB pressing wastewater and POME for biogas production, with a focus on integrating circular economy principles into the palm oil industry [24]. The study found an optimal mix of 45% POME, 50% seed, and 5% EFB wastewater for semi-continuous fermentation, which significantly increased biogas and methane yields to 18,679 mL/L and 6778 mL/L respectively, with a 62% methane content and a 67% COD removal efficiency over a 25-day hydraulic retention time. Notably, Figure 3(b) from their study presents results from various experimental sets of batch co-digestion, with the mentioned mixture (Experimental set 7) yielding the highest cumulative biogas and methane at 396 ± 4.58 mL and 294 ± 3.51 mL respectively. This result was superior compared to other mix ratios tested, underscoring the effectiveness of the identified optimal conditions. Another study has focused on the utilization of EFB ash as a source of potassium and other minerals, demonstrating that with proper treatment and combination with other fertilizing agents like urea and diammonium phosphate, EFB can be converted into a beneficial NPK fertilizer [85]. Additionally, the integration of EFB with inorganic fertilizers was shown to increase vegetative growth and support productivity in oil palm plantations, providing an optimal rate of application for effective use [85].

3

Figure 3 Biogas production from POME. (a) Methane yield vs organic loading rate (OLR) (left) and inlet total solids in POME (right) [84]. (b) Digester (left) and biogas and methane production per volatile solids of POME (right) [24]. All panels are under a creative common license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.

The integration of biogas generation from POME in the palm oil industry presents a diverse array of benefits, spanning sustainable energy production, significant environmental improvements, and substantial economic gains. The implementation of integrated biogas and wastewater treatment systems has proven effective in generating up to 1.9 MW of electrical power or compressed biomethane [86]. This approach aligns with regional renewable energy and greenhouse gas targets, potentially contributing 540 MW of installed capacity or 37 million MMBtu in the form of Bio-CNG or biomethane, and greatly reducing GHG emissions [87]. Life cycle assessments of POME-based energy generation, utilizing technologies like the covered lagoon bio-digester and the continuous stirred tank reactor, have shown net environmental benefits in terms of global warming and acidification potential, advocating for the adoption of eco-friendly biogas facilities in palm oil mills [88]. Economically, the conversion of biogas from POME to energy offers significant financial returns, as exemplified by a palm oil mill processing 60 tonnes/hr potentially earning a net profit of RM 3.8 million per year from electricity generation [89]. Additionally, integrating anaerobic up-flow anaerobic sludge-fixed film reactor and membrane separation processes transforms organic waste into biogas while producing high-quality effluent, thus reducing operational costs and generating heat or electricity in the mill [90]. A novel approach further elaborates on the economic viability of integrated technology for biogas energy and compost production in a palm oil mill. A case study processing 54 tonnes of fresh fruit bunch (FFB) per hour highlights the potential to produce 8.2 GWh per year of electricity using biogas captured from POME. This integrated system, which also produces significant quantities of compost using EFB and POME anaerobic sludge, emerges as a more attractive solution than implementing either biogas energy or compost technology individually. This approach is economically effective even without clean development mechanism support, presenting a sustainable and profitable solution for the palm oil industry, while simultaneously contributing to local economic activation and environmental improvement [91].

Furthermore, PKS are utilized as biomass fuel for energy generation and as a source for activated carbon, indicating the diverse applications of these waste materials in contributing to a circular economy [92, 93]. For example, a study used PKS-derived graphene oxide derivative materials as anode electrodes in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) [94]. The results showed that PKS-rGO/ZnO had the highest power density of 43.2 mW/m² and a current density of 111.1 mA/m², significantly enhancing the MFC's performance. Additionally, this modification led to a bioremediation efficiency of up to 93% [94]. PKS was employed as granular filter media for removing COD and color from palm oil mill effluent (POME). The study reported removal efficiencies of 77% for COD and 69% for color using PKS, demonstrating its effectiveness compared to traditional sand filters [95]. Microporous adsorbents derived from PKS have been used as adsorbent for CO2 in [96]. The adsorbents achieved a CO2 purity of 83% and a recovery of 65% using ZIF-8, indicating its potential in flue gas treatment applications [96]. Meanwhile, in the context of urban stormwater management, pervious concrete mixtures incorporating PKS showed a range of heavy metal removal between 14 and 63%, depending on the type of heavy metals present in the runoff water [97]. In addition, in the realm of biodiesel production, a study used PKS-derived sulfonated magnetic biochar as a catalyst [98]. The total environmental impact of waste cooking oil biodiesel produced by this catalyst was quantified as 1.08E+01 Pt per tonne of biodiesel, with an 89% decrease in total weighted impacts when substituting palm oil biodiesel and diesel [98].

Technological innovations such as gasification and pyrolysis convert organic waste into synthesis gas, biochar, bio-oil, and gases, offering routes to transform waste into energy and valuable materials [99-102]. Gasification converts organic waste into synthesis gas, which can be processed for heat, electricity, or biofuels [99, 100]. Pyrolysis, on the other hand, heats waste materials without oxygen, producing biochar, bio-oil, and gases [101, 102]. Biorefineries extract bioactive compounds from waste, supporting applications in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and functional foods, while waste oils and fatty acids are processed into biodiesel, further aligning industry practices with sustainability objectives [103-107].

Digital solutions offer transformative potential in waste management, providing real-time data, predictive analytics, and collaborative platforms to enhance waste valorization and promote resource efficiency [108-112] They provide insights into waste generation, movement, and disposal across various stages of the palm oil industry, allowing for more effective and efficient resource utilization. Automated waste sorting technologies, environmental impact assessment tools, and continuous monitoring of waste metrics foster a culture of continuous waste reduction, aligning industry practices with circular economy principles [31, 107, 113-115].

Product Diversification and Value-Addition from Palm Oil By-Products

The palm oil industry is redefining its relationship with by-products, transforming what was once considered waste into valuable commodities. This shift is not just a testament to innovation but also aligns with the principles of a circular economy, seeking to minimize waste and maximize resource efficiency [116-118]. EFB, PKS, and POME are among the by-products now seen as economic and environmental assets. EFB is repurposed as a biomass source for energy generation, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and supporting renewable energy initiatives [119, 120].

Furthermore, EFB fibers are composted into nutrient-rich fertilizers, enhancing sustainable agriculture practices [121, 122], and used in the production of green materials and biomaterials [123, 124]. The morphology of palm oil flower and fruit fibers was studied using scanning electron microscopy, revealing distinct characteristics (Figure 4(a)-(d)). The palm oil flower fibers demonstrate considerable morphological diversity, characterized by aligned, nonwoven, and irregularly structured bundles influenced by the presence of noncellulosic particles like lignin and pectin. In contrast, palm fruit fibers exhibit a robust honeycomb-like structure in their cross-sections, signifying strong inter-fiber binding. Notably, this honeycomb structure consists of pores with varying sizes and shapes; the periphery features small-diameter hollow structures, while the center houses larger-diameter hollows [125]. In addition, isolated cellulose from OPEFB is presented in Figure 4 (e) and (f). At an elevated acid concentration of 60% under 35℃ hydrolysis temperature, and time (25 min), the resultant fibers were of a notably small diameter, approximately 317 nm, as depicted in Figure 4 (e) and (f)..

4

Figure 4 SEM images of (a, b) the palm oil flower fibers and (c, d) fruit fibers. Panels a-d are from [125]. (e, f) SEM images of isolated cellulose from EFB [130]. All panels are under a creative common license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.

Chaiwong et al.'s study on treating EFB fiber offers compelling insights into sustainable material enhancement for the palm oil industry [126]. Their detailed examination revealed that fibers treated with 5 w/v% NaOH displayed a pronounced rough surface morphology and optimally removed surface contaminants, improving fiber-matrix adhesion. Notably, this treatment regimen yielded the highest tensile strength (13.75 MPa) in wheat gluten-based bioplastic composites, underscoring the interplay between surface treatment, morphology, and resultant mechanical properties. Yang et al.'s investigation into starch-based bioplastic composites with treated oil palm EFB (TEFB) fibers illuminates the nuanced relationship between fiber content and resultant composite properties [127]. SEM micrographs showcased that optimal fiber distribution is achieved below 10 wt% content, beyond which challenges such as starch retrogradation and fiber aggregation arise. Concurrently, the study highlighted a substantial improvement in tensile strength, rising from 0.45 to 1.99 MPa, as TEFB fiber content increased, affirming the fiber's reinforcing role. However, elongation at break decreased with most increased fiber content levels. This balance between tensile strength and morphology, underlined by the SEM findings, emphasizes the critical importance of precise fiber treatments [121, 122] and loading levels in developing sustainable bioplastics. Another study developed natural fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites using two different sizes of EFB fibers (605 μm and 633 μm) and acrylic thermoplastic resin. The composites, maintaining a filler content of 42 wt.%, improved their mechanical properties significantly with processing temperature, showing the potential of EFB fibers in composite fabrication [128]. In addition, the exploration of acetylated lignin from EFB in electrospinning nanofibres revealed electrical conductivity of 443 μS/cm and viscosity of 2.8×10−3 Pa.s for the samples, with more beads on the surface of lignin/PVA nanofibres compared to acetylated lignin/PVA nanofibres, suggesting an improved surface structure [129].

PKS, traditionally seen as waste, are now utilized for energy production and as raw materials for activated carbon, contributing to water and air purification processes [131, 132]. POME, once a challenging waste stream due to its high organic content, is now harnessed for anaerobic digestion, generating biogas for electricity and heat generation [133]. This approach not only addresses waste disposal issues but also adds a renewable energy source to the industry's portfolio. The organic components of POME are also transformed into nutrient-rich organic fertilizers, further contributing to sustainable agricultural practices [122].

Anaerobic digestion technology has revolutionized the way palm oil mills manage POME, turning it into biogas and contributing to a more sustainable energy landscape [134, 135]. The extraction of bioactive compounds from palm oil and its by-products has paved the way for the creation of high-value functional ingredients, while bio-based chemicals and green cosmetics have emerged as sustainable alternatives in various industries [136- 141].

In transforming palm oil by-products into value-added commodities, the industry not only addresses environmental challenges but also opens up new avenues for economic growth. This transformation leads to cost savings by reducing waste disposal expenses and creates new revenue streams through the sale of innovative products. By embracing the principles of a circular economy, the palm oil industry is making strides towards sustainability, resource efficiency, and economic stability, positioning itself as a leader in responsible resource management and innovative product development [142, 143]. However, achieving these outcomes requires overcoming technological, market, and regulatory challenges to fully realize the potential of these innovations and ensure their successful integration into the industry's value chain [144, 145].

Technological Innovations Enabling Circular Economy Practices

Technological advancements are playing a crucial role in the implementation of circular economy practices within the palm oil industry (see Table 3). These innovations can facilitate waste reduction, resource optimization, and value creation across the value chain [146].

Gasification technology is a leading solution that transforms organic waste like EFB and palm kernel shells into syngas, which can power gas turbines or internal combustion engines, reducing dependence on traditional fossil fuels [147]. Syngas can also be refined into synthetic biofuels, serving as an eco-friendly alternative in transportation and industrial sectors. Studies have demonstrated that syngas yields and reactor performance can be substantially enhanced by optimizing the EFB feeding rate and gasification temperature, with one study

achieving a carbon conversion approaching 97% and a solar-to-fuel energy conversion efficiency up to 20% at temperatures between 1100-1300 ℃ [148]. The integrated production of bio-dimethyl ether using biomass gasification and direct synthesis (IBG-DME), using oil palm residue as feedstock, is another area of exploration. The process is thermally self-sufficient at gasifying temperatures around 882 ℃ and can achieve maximum yield of bio-DME at higher temperatures of around 950 ℃ [149]. In parallel, the comparison of EFB and PKS for syngas production using Aspen Plus simulation indicates that temperature and equivalence ratio significantly influence syngas output and composition, with EFB showing a higher capability to produce quality syngas compared to PKS [150]. Continuous solar gasification of EFB was experimentally carried out in a solar particle-fed gasifier, examining the influence of gasifying agent types (H2O and CO2), gasifying agent/EFB molar ratios, and temperatures. The study concluded that solar EFB gasification performed efficiently with both H2O and CO2 gasifying agents under continuous operation, achieving high carbon conversion and solar-to-fuel energy conversion efficiency [151]. The co-gasification of different biomass feedstocks, like oil palm trunk (OPT) and frond (OPF), is considered a reliable means of syngas production. The study found that the optimum blend was 30 OPT/70 OPF, producing the highest gas constituents of CO, H2, and CH4 compared to other blends [152]. The unique thermal decomposition process of pyrolysis technology yields valuable outputs such as bio-oil and biochar, which can be employed for energy generation or as feedstocks for various chemical [153]. These technologies not only address waste management concerns but also contribute to a more sustainable energy paradigm, aligned with global environmental aspirations.

Biorefining involves converting biomass into a range of products, from chemicals to materials and energy. In the palm oil industry, biorefining aims to extract valuable compounds from by-products like EFB and PKS, providing sustainable alternatives to synthetic ingredients [13]. Rhamnolipids production utilizing palm oil refinery byproducts like palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD) and fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) has been studied [154]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 was used to convert these by-products into high-value RLs, achieving concentrations up to 3.4 g/L using PFAD. The production not only highlights the potential for waste valorization but also the ability to reduce surface tension significantly, making them efficient biosurfactants for various applications. The study underscores the potential for integrated palm oil biorefinery systems to produce lowcost and renewable substrates for RL production [154]. Additionally, the utilization of agro-industrial waste as a renewable carbon source has been gaining attention, particularly focusing on the production of PHAs and biosurfactants as biodegradable alternatives to petrochemicals [155]. Molasses and sweet water, by-products from sugar cane and palm oil production, have been identified as feasible, inexpensive feedstocks for PHA and biosurfactant production [155].

Furthermore, the valorization of oil palm EFBs for the generation of bioenergy and bio-based products is an area with significant potential. Indonesia, with its intensive agro-industrial sector, produces large volumes of oil palm EFBs, which have been identified as promising to produce bioethanol and xylitol [156]. Scenario analyses suggest that co-production of bioethanol, xylitol, and lignin is the most favorable, presenting an opportunity to significantly boost the country's production of these bio-based products. However, the realization of these biorefining processes requires further efforts in addressing technical challenges, policy formulation, and supply chain optimization [156].

Thanapimmetha et al., explored optimal fermentation strategies for enhancing bioethanol production from oil palm EFB [157]. Investigating three strategies: separate hydrolysis and fermentation, simultaneous saccharification and fermentation, and delayed simultaneous saccharification and fermentation, they aimed to increase bioethanol yield while reducing process time. After pretreatment, oil palm EFBs cellulose content rose to 72.1%. The study found DSSF to be superior, yielding the highest bioethanol concentration of 26.1±0.18 g/L and the shortest overall process time of 73 hours, making it the most efficient method compared to separate hydrolysis and fermentation and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. This advancement provides a significant contribution to sustainable bioethanol production, offering an efficient route for converting agroindustrial waste into valuable energy resources.

Wilaithup et al. reported study on enhancing the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of bioethanol production from oil palm trunk (OPT) fibers through a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process utilizing activated immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae SC90 cells [158]. This method was chosen for its ability to reuse yeast cells, thus reducing production costs. The study found that immobilized cells produced a significantly

higher ethanol concentration of 104.52 g/L from glucose within 48 hours compared to 85.87 g/L by free cells. When using 10% and 20% (w/v) alkaline pretreated OPT fibers as the carbon source, the batch simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process yielded a maximum ethanol concentration of 29.68 g/L and an ethanol yield of 0.32 g/g. The fed-batch SSF further improved these results, achieving a maximum ethanol concentration of 51.68 g/L and a yield of 0.28 g/g. These findings highlight the potential of activated immobilized S. cerevisiae SC90 cells in producing higher concentrations of ethanol from OPT fibers without the need for additional nitrogen sources, marking a promising advancement in cost-effective second-generation (2G) bioethanol production.

Saelee et al. investigated cost-effective lactic acid production using old OPT sap as a substrate [159]. They employed various fermentation modes with Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 10863. The study found that modified constant feed mode of fed-batch and repeated fed-batch fermentation significantly increased LA concentration, yield, and productivity, achieving an average of 95.94 g/L lactic acid concentration and 6.40 g/L/h productivity in just 11 hours. In comparison, open and repeated batch methods took 21 hours for slightly lower outcomes. This research highlights the potential of using OPT sap for efficient and scalable LA production, suggesting that cheap agricultural by-products could be viable substrates for industrial bioprocessing.

Supercritical fluid extraction uses supercritical carbon dioxide as a solvent to extract bioactives, offering high selectivity, reduced environmental impact, and solvent-free final product [160]. Microwave energy speeds up extraction, reducing time and energy consumption [161]. Supercritical fluid extraction using CO2 as a solvent has emerged as a potential green technology for the extraction of valuable compounds from palm oil byproducts. Studies have shown the effective extraction of β-carotene from crude palm oil, with optimal conditions for maximum volumetric mass transfer coefficient found to be around 2.486 × 10-2 s-1 at 7.5 MPa and 100 ℃ for 1 hour [162]. This approach not only maximizes the yield but also retains the quality of the β-carotene extracted. Moreover, the extraction of tocopherols from palm oil leaves using supercritical fluid extraction yielded high concentrations, showcasing the potential to process agricultural waste into valuable products like tocopherols and carotenes [163]. The extraction conditions of supercritical fluid extraction have a significant impact on the yield and quality of the products. For instance, the highest yield of β-carotene from crude palm oil was obtained at a pressure of 75 bar, temperature of 120 ℃, and an extraction time of 1 hour [164]. Similarly, the solubility of tocopherols in carbon dioxide was found to be around 2.27% at 120 ℃ and 5.44 MPa, indicating the effect of temperature and pressure on the extraction process [165]. Supercritical fluid extraction with CO2 is not just limited to extracting specific components but is also beneficial for the palm oil industry. It can extract nearly 100% oil, producing fractionated, refined, bleached, and deodorized palm oil, palm kernel oil, and purified fatty acid fractions suitable for various applications [166]. This method is preferable due to its non-toxic, inexpensive, non-flammable, and non-polluting nature. Furthermore, the addition of ethanol as a co-solvent in SC-CO2 extraction of palm kernel oil from palm kernel cake has been shown to improve the yield and quality of the oil, indicating the role of modifiers in enhancing the extraction process [167].

Membrane technology is increasingly pivotal in wastewater treatment and product recovery within the palm oil industry, offering innovative solutions to enhance efficiency and sustainability [44]. Recent research sheds light on various applications and optimizations of this technology. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors are utilized for wastewater treatment, specifically targeting the reduction of membrane fouling caused primarily by extracellular polymeric substances. A study found that introducing a microbe activator at a 1/500 dilution into the anaerobic membrane bioreactors significantly improved performance, yielding a chemical oxygen demand removal efficiency of 79.47% ± 2.76%, the highest among tested dilutions [168]. To produce xylooligosaccharides from oil palm EFB, membranes facilitated the concentration of highly extracted xylan liquor to 53.7%. A subsequent xylanase-catalyzed hydrolysis under pilot-scale conditions yielded a 69.3% sum of xylobiose and xylotriose from the extracted xylan, demonstrating the feasibility of membrane technology for efficient xylooligosaccharides production [169]. Nanofiltration has been explored for separating xylose from glucose in OPF bagasse hydrolysate. The Desal-5 DK membrane showed a high xylose separation factor of 1.63, indicating its applicability in large-scale sugar separation processes [170]. Integrated electrocoagulation with ultrafiltration membranes for treating POME demonstrated that the 2A-2C–2B electrode configuration achieved high contaminant removal rates: 59.1% for total dissolved solids (TDS), 99.9% for TSS, 96.8% for COD, and 96% for BOD [60]. The life cycle assessment of anaerobic-treated POME in integrated membrane processes revealed a significant impact of the hollow fiber membrane from adsorption integrated membrane, contributing 42% to 99% across all impact categories. The electro-oxidation integrated membrane, on the other hand, had a lesser environmental impact, particularly on the ozone formation (human health) at 0.38 kg NOx-eq compared to the adsorption integrated membrane at 0.66 kg NOx-eq [171].

Waste repurposing and circular business models offer innovative strategies for reshaping the palm oil industry's approach to by-products [172, 173]. Industrial symbiosis drives collaboration across industries, enabling the exchange of waste materials for productive purposes [174]. Circular business models emphasize the reintegration of waste into the value chain, promoting resource efficiency by reducing reliance on virgin resources, minimizing waste, and lowering energy consumption.

However, challenges related to technology implementation, market acceptance, regulations, and supply chain integration must be addressed [175]. Collaborations among stakeholders, including industry players, researchers, and policymakers, are crucial for overcoming these hurdles and pave the way for a circular economy that prioritizes sustainability, waste reduction, and economic resilience.

Table 3Examples of technological innovations enabling circular economy practices in the palm oil industry.
TechnologyPurposeResources usedBenefitsRef.
GasificationConverts waste (EFB, PKS) to
syngas for energy generation
EFB, PKSReduces dependence
on fossil fuels,
produces biofuels
[147-152]
PyrolysisProduces bio-oil and biochar
from waste for energy or
chemicals
EFB, PKSReduces waste,
provides sustainable
energy and chemicals
[153]
Biorefining or
biotechnology
Extracts valuable compounds
from by-products (EFB, PKS) for
various uses
EFB, PKSValorizes waste,
produces sustainable
alternatives to
synthetic ingredients
[13, 154, 155]
Biorefining or
biotechnology
Uses EFB and OPT to produce
bioethanol
EFB, OPTEfficiently converts
waste into renewable
energy
[156-158]
Biorefining or
biotechnology
Uses OPT sap to produce lactic
acid
OPT sapCost-effective and
scalable production of
lactic acid from
agricultural waste
[159]
Supercritical Fluid
Extraction
Extracts bioactives from by
products (β-carotene,
tocopherols) with CO2 as a
solvent
Crude palm oil, palm
oil leaves, palm
kernel cake
High selectivity,
reduced
environmental
impact, solvent-free
products
[160, 162-167]
Membrane
technology
Used in wastewater treatment
and product recovery
EFB, OPF, POMEImproves efficiency
and sustainability in
various processes
[168-171]

EFB – empty fruit bunch; OPT – oil palm trunk; PKS – palm kernel shell; OPF – oil palm frond.

Case Studies of CE Implementation in the Palm Oil Industry

Implementing a CE in the palm oil industry is a transformative approach that significantly enhances sustainability, waste valorization, and economic efficiency. The industry produces substantial biomass byproducts, effluents, and refinery wastes typically disposed of in landfills, leading to inefficiency and environmental concerns. A shift to a CE approach entail optimizing the reuse and recycling of these residues within the palm oil sector and integrating with other industries like paper, polymer, and furniture, as well as various biorefineries. The objective is to convert palm-based biomass and refinery wastes into value-added products and energy, thereby enhancing resource circularity, reducing landfill disposal, and lowering emissions (Table 4).

A study employing a mathematical optimization model sought to identify optimal pathways for biomass, POME, and refinery wastes circularity within the palm oil sector [15]. By integrating with industries like paper, polymer, and furniture, the model explored scenarios to maximize economic potential and minimize emissions and landfill waste. The multi-objective results showed impressive outcomes, including an economic potential of USD 151.36 million, a reduction of net emissions by −804,946.60 tCO2, and a significant reduction of landfill waste by 80.17%, highlighting the integration potential with the polymer industry [15].

In another study examining Industry 4.0's barriers within a circular economy context in the palm oil industry, 18 essential challenges were identified using the fuzzy Delphi method and interpretive structural modelling [18]. Key challenges included the lack of automation system virtualization and unclear economic benefits of digital investment. Addressing these challenges is crucial for operational decision-making and the successful integration of Industry 4.0 within a circular economy [18].

Table 4Examples of circular economy implementations in the palm oil industry.
ExampleDescriptionBenefitsRefs.
Multi-objective
optimization model
Integrates palm oil waste with paper, polymer,
and furniture industries to maximize economic
potential and minimize emissions and landfill
waste.
USD 151.36 million potential profit,
-804,946.60 tCO2 emission
reduction, 80.17% landfill waste
reduction.
[15]
Energy efficiency
analysis
Shows substantial energy savings potential
(~40%) with advanced palm oil mill mechanization
compared to manual and semi-mechanized
methods.
Reduced production costs and
increased energy recovery
opportunities.
[176]
CE model
development
Demonstrates potential for reducing imported
inputs (steam, electricity) by 39.29% and 13.469%
respectively, even with slight profit decrease.
Increased resource circularity and
environmental benefits.
[10]
Co-digestion for
biogas production
Achieves significant biogas accumulation and
methane content from palm oil waste, reducing
COD and demonstrating circular approach in
biogas generation.
Sustainable palm oil processing and
renewable energy production.
[24]
Industry 4.0
barriers
identification
Identifies key challenges like lack of automation
and unclear economic benefits of digital
investment in circular economy palm oil industry.
Informs operational decision
making and Industry 4.0
integration.
[18]
Industry 4.0 drivers
identification
Highlights complex interplay of factors like
information access, cybersecurity, economic
attractiveness, and policy in driving Industry 4.0
adoption for circular economy.
Guides development of strategies
to facilitate Industry 4.0
integration.
[19]
POME-based
biodiesel synthesis
Achieves 89% biodiesel yield from POME solids,
repurposing a challenging feedstock into valuable
biofuel.
Circular waste management and
renewable energy production.
[29]
Chemical-enzymatic
bioethanol
production
Integrates chemical and enzymatic processes for
bioethanol production from palm fruit bunch,
showing potential for efficiency and
environmental friendliness.
Advanced bioethanol production
with circular utilization of biomass
waste.
[26]

Energy consumption patterns in palm oil mills were determined in a study conducted in Ghana to enhance system efficiency and reduce production costs [176]. The results indicated average total energy consumption for manual, semi-mechanized, and highly mechanized extraction systems at 122.5, 112.9, and 82.4 kJ/kg respectively. Notably, the net potential electricity from oil palm residue was estimated at 299 kJ/kg, which could be utilized for other operations, emphasizing the benefits of advanced mechanization for energy efficiency [176].

The feasibility of a sustainable CE was evaluated in a study that developed a mathematical model demonstrating the biomass network, targeting common resources like fertilizer, steam, and electricity for recycling [10]. The results indicated that while the linear economy model was preferred in terms of profitability, the circular economy model showed potential in reducing imported steam by 39.292% and imported electricity by 13.469%, albeit with a slight reduction in gross profit of 0.642% [10].

Research on biogas production through the co-digestion of EFB pressing wastewater and POME revealed optimal conditions leading to significant biogas accumulation of 18,679 mL/L and methane totalling 6778 mL/L [24]. The methane content was 62%, and the COD removal efficiency was 67%, showcasing the potential of this approach to enhance sustainable palm oil processing through a circular economic approach [24].

Investigating the drivers of Industry 4.0 in a CE within the palm oil industry, the study identified 17 driving criteria in the cause group and 13 criteria in the effect group [19]. Notable among them were information for practitioners, cybersecurity, improving real-time, economic attractiveness, laws and policy, and energy recovery, highlighting the complexity and interconnectivity of factors influencing the adoption of Industry 4.0 in a circular economy [19].

An innovative approach to biodiesel synthesis using POME as a feedstock resulted in an 89% yield of biodiesel from the available fatty acids in the POME solids [29]. This process presents a viable route to repurpose a challenging feedstock and contribute to the circular economy [29]. Furthermore, an economic analysis of biodiesel production from POME using Microwave Heating demonstrated the process's economic feasibility, suggesting Malaysia as a potential location due to palm oil production density [25].

Lastly, the proposed novel chemical enzymatic integration process for bioethanol production from oil palm EFB indicated the potential of this integration technology in applying the circular economy to make bioethanol production more efficient and environmentally friendly [26].

Prospects, Challenges, and Recommendations

The palm oil sector, known for its wide-reaching economic and social influence, is currently grappling with urgent challenges related to environmental sustainability and waste management. To address these issues, CE approaches have emerged as transformative solutions that enable the effective utilization of by-products, the minimization of waste, and the promotion of sustainable production methods.

The principles of CE provide a robust framework that the palm oil industry can use to convert waste into valuable resources. This transition from traditional linear models to sustainable practices involves the implementation of recycling, upcycling, and the adoption of innovative technologies, which ultimately leads to an improvement in both environmental sustainability and economic efficiency.

Within the palm oil industry, a significant amount of biomass by-products, effluents, and refinery wastes are generated. To mitigate the environmental impacts of this waste, it is crucial to prioritize effective waste management strategies, particularly through the application of CE principles. By placing an emphasis on waste valorization and recycling, the industry can reduce the use of landfills, minimize emissions, and avoid resource depletion, all of which contribute to the overall sustainability of the sector.

The palm oil industry focuses on the implementation of CE strategies to reduce waste generation and enhance the utilization of by-products through technological innovation, bioenergy production, and the development of value-added products. To achieve these objectives, it is imperative to optimize processes, integrate various sectors of the industry, and cultivate markets for circular products. Ultimately, these endeavors will yield both environmental and economic advantages. The industry's by-products hold potential for a range of value-added products, fostering economic diversification and sustainability. By capitalizing on advancements in biorefining, material science, and technology, the industry can convert biomass, POME, and other residues into biofuels, biomaterials, and biochemicals, thereby bolstering profitability and mitigating environmental impact.

Technological innovations such as gasification, pyrolysis, and biorefining play a crucial role in advancing CE practices in the palm oil industry. These technologies are instrumental in waste reduction, resource optimization, and the generation of value-added products, significantly enhancing sustainability and economic outcomes. Case studies provide examples of the effective implementation of CE practices in the palm oil industry, demonstrating the economic, environmental, and technological feasibility of converting waste into valuable resources. These include optimizing biomass and POME for energy and products, applying Industry 4.0 technologies, and employing innovative approaches like bioethanol production from palm residues.

Nevertheless, the transition to a CE in the palm oil industry is not without challenges. Significant barriers that must be overcome include regulatory frameworks, technological and infrastructural innovation, financial constraints, consumer behavior and market acceptance, collaboration throughout the supply chain, organizational culture, and education. To facilitate this transition, clear and supportive policies, investments in technology and innovation, and industry-wide collaboration are crucial. The industry is at a critical juncture where embracing technology, reinforcing regulations, promoting partnerships, educating consumers, and investing in research are essential for a sustainable and efficient future. By adopting circular business models, integrating sustainability into core operations, and establishing robust monitoring mechanisms, the industry can demonstrate its commitment to sustainable practices and enhance its resilience. In essence, the shift to a circular economy in the palm oil industry is indispensable and intricate, but it holds the key to sustainable growth and environmental preservation. Through the adoption of a long-term vision and a collaborative approach, the industry can make significant contributions to a sustainable planet, ensuring the well-being of communities and ecosystems for future generations.

Abbreviations

BOD : biological oxygen demand

CE : circular economy

COD : chemical oxygen demand

CPO : crude palm oil EFB : empty fruit bunch FAME : fatty acid methyl ester

OPF : oil palm frond OPT : oil palm trunk

PFAD : palm fatty acid distillate PMF : palm mesocarp fibers PKO : palm kernel oil PKS : palm kernel shell POME : palm oil mill effluent TSS : total suspended solids

Research Intelligence

Data from OpenAlex ↗

Metrics

19
Citations
7.80
FWCIfield-weighted
98th
Percentilevs same year + field
Article
Work type
Open Access

Related Research

Citation Trend

Citation Timeline

YearCitations
20267
20259
20243

Institution Network

References

  1. Permana, G., Marliana, S.N., Susandarini, R. & Addaha, H., Sustaining Rainforest Remnants in Plantation Landscapes: Degree of Oil Palm Stand-Induced Edge Effects on Forest Microclimate and Regeneration, CERNE, 28, e-103039, 2022. DOI: 10.1590/01047760202228013039
  2. Kunene, N. & Chung, Y.C., Sustainable Production Policy Impact on Palm Oil Firms’ Performance: Empirical Analysis from Indonesia, Sustainability, 12, pp. 8750-1 – 8750-17, Oct. 2020. DOI: 10.3390/su12208750
  3. Cunha de Melo, K., Silva de Oliveira, I., Helena de Oliveira Pires, L., Santos do Nascimento, L.A., Roberto Zamian, J., Narciso da Rocha Filho, G., Fonseca Passos, M., Santos Lopes, A., Converti, A. & Costa, C.E.F.D., Study of the Antioxidant Power of the Waste Oil from Palm Oil Bleaching Clay, Energies, 13(4), pp. 804-1 – 804-13, 2020.
  4. Chiriacò, M.V., Bellotta, M., Jusić, J. & Perugini, L., Palm oil’s Contribution to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: Outcomes of A Review of Socio-Economic Aspects, Environmental Research Letters, 17, pp. 063007-1 – 063007-22, Jun. 2022. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6e77
  5. Peteru, S. & Komarudin, H., Achieving Sustainability in the Palm Oil Sector: Challenges and Key Interventions for Indonesia and Malaysia, European Forest Institute, 2022.
  6. Liu, W., Zhan, J., Li, Z., Jia, S., Zhang, F. & Li, Y., Eco-Efficiency Evaluation of Regional Circular Economy: A Case Study in Zengcheng, Guangzhou, Sustainability, 10(2), pp. 453-1 – 453-16, Feb. 2018. DOI: 10.3390/su10020453
  7. Dong, H., Wang, B., Li, J., Li, Z., Li, F., & Wang, C., Circular Economy Implementation and Business Performance: The Mediating Role of Environmental Performance in the Chinese Energy Production Enterprises, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 982994, Aug. 2022. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.982994. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.982994
  8. Hernández-Chover, V., Castellet-Viciano, L., Bellver-Domingo, Á. & Hernández-Sancho, F., The Potential of Digitalization to Promote a Circular Economy in the Water Sector, Water, 14(22), pp. 3722-1 – 3722-13, Nov. 2022.
  9. Omran, N., Sharaai, A.H. & Hashim, A.H., Visualization of the Sustainability Level of Crude Palm Oil Production: A Life Cycle Approach, Sustainability, 13(4), pp. 1607-1 – 1607-16, Feb. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/su13041607
  10. Yeo, J.Y.J., How, B.S., Teng, S.Y., Leong, W.D., Ng, W.P.Q., Lim, C.H., Ngan, S.L., Sunarso, J. & Lam, H.L., Synthesis of Sustainable Circular Economy in Palm Oil Industry Using Graph-Theoretic Method, Sustainability, 12(19), pp. 8081-1 – 8081-29, Sep. 2020. DOI: 10.3390/su12198081
  11. Tengku Hamzah, T.A.A., Zainuddin, Z., Mohd Yusoff, M., Osman, S., Abdullah, A., Md Saini, K. & Sisun, A., The Conundrum of Carbon Trading Projects towards Sustainable Development: A Review from the Palm Oil Industry in Malaysia, Energies, 12(18), pp. 3530-1 – 3530-15, Sep. 2019. DOI: 10.3390/en12183530
  12. Mohammad, S., Baidurah, S., Kobayashi, T., Ismail, N. & Leh, C.P., Palm Oil Mill Effluent Treatment Processes—A Review, Processes, 9(5), pp. 739-1 – 739-22, Apr. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/pr9050739
  13. Akhbari, A., Kutty, P.K., Chuen, O.C. & Ibrahim, S., A Study of Palm Oil Mill Processing and Environmental Assessment of Palm Oil Mill Effluent Treatment, Environmental Engineering Research, 25(2), pp. 212–221, April 2019. DOI: 10.4491/eer.2018.452
  14. Nadzim, U.K.H.M., Hairom, N.H.H., Ying, C.Y., Madon, R.H., Sidik, D.A.B., Dzinun, H., Harun, Z., Hamzah, S. & Azzura, A., Palm Oil Mill Secondary Effluent Treatment Via Nanofiltration Membrane Photocatalytic Reactor (MPR), in Mohammad, A., Haan, T.Y., & Hilal, N., Nanofiltration for Sustainability: Reuse, Recycle and Resource Recovery, eds., CRCS, pp. 189-208, 2023. DOI: 10.1201/9781003261827-10
  15. Rajakal, J.P., Hwang, J.Z.H., Hassim, M.H., Andiappan, V., Tan, Q.T. & Ng, D.K.,, Integration and Optimisation of Palm Oil Sector with Multiple-Industries to Achieve Circular Economy, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 40, pp. 318-336, Sep. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2023.06.022
  16. Lim, C.H., Loh, Y.W., Foo, D.C., Ng, W.P. & Lam, H.L., Circular Economy and Industry 4.0 Technology Integration Framework for the Oil Palm Industry, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 88, pp.1267-1272, 2021. DOI: 10.3303/cet2188211
  17. Abdul-Hamid, A.Q., Ali, M.H., Osman, L.H., Tseng, M.L. & Lim, M.K., Industry 4.0 Quasi-effect between Circular Economy and Sustainability: Palm Oil Industry, International Journal of Production Economics, 253, pp. 108616-1 – 108616-23, Nov. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108616
  18. Abdul-Hamid, A.Q., Ali, M.H., Tseng, M.L., Lan, S. & Kumar, M., Impeding Challenges on Industry 4.0 in Circular Economy: Palm Oil Industry in Malaysia, Computers & Operations Research, 123, 105052, Nov. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2020.105052
  19. Abdul-Hamid, A.Q., Ali, M.H., Osman, L.H. & Tseng, M.L., The Drivers of Industry 4.0 in a Circular Economy: The Palm Oil Industry in Malaysia, Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 129216, Nov. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129216
  20. Ibrahim, H.A., Zaidan, A.A., Qahtan, S. & Zaidan, B.B., Sustainability Assessment of Palm Oil Industry 4.0 Technologies in A Circular Economy Applications Based on Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Rough Set-FWZIC and EDAS Methods, Applied Soft Computing, 136, 110073, Mar. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110073
  21. Yamaguchi, S., International Trade And Circular Economy – Policy Alignment, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2021. DOI: 10.1787/ae4a2176-en
  22. Calvo-Porral, C. & Lévy-Mangin, J.-P., The Circular Economy Business Model: Examining Consumers’ Acceptance of Recycled Goods, Administrative Sciences, 10(2), pp. 28-1 – 28-13, May 2020.
  23. Batlles-delaFuente, A., Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M.D. & Cortés-García, F.J., An Evolutionary Approach on the Framework of Circular Economy Applied to Agriculture, Agronomy, 12(3), pp. 620-1 – 620-23, Mar. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12030620
  24. Suksaroj, C., Jearat, K., Cherypiew, N., Rattanapan, C. & Suksaroj, T.T., Promoting Circular Economy in the Palm Oil Industry through Biogas Codigestion of Palm Oil Mill Effluent and Empty Fruit Bunch Pressed Wastewater, Water, 15(12), pp. 2153-1 – 2153-18, Jun. 2023. DOI: 10.3390/w15122153
  25. Waudby, H. & Zein, S.H., A Circular Economy Approach for Industrial Scale Biodiesel Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent Using Microwave Heating: Design, Simulation, Techno-Economic Analysis and Location Comparison, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 148, pp. 1006-1018, Apr. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.02.011
  26. Harihastuti, N. & Purnamastuti, N.F., Utilization of Waste Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches for Bioethanol through Chemical-Enzymatic Integration Process Technology and Towards Concept the Implementation of Circular Economy, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1098(1), 012082, 2022. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1098/1/012082
  27. Bejarano, P.A.C., Rodriguez-Miranda, J.P., Maldonado-Astudillo, R.I., Maldonado-Astudillo, Y.I. & Salazar, R., Circular Economy Indicators for the Assessment of Waste and By-Products from the Palm Oil Sector, Processes, 10(5), 903, Apr. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/pr10050903
  28. Foong, S.Y., Chan, Y.H., Lock, S.S.M., Chin, B.L.F., Yiin, C.L., Cheah, K.W., Loy, A.C.M., Yek, P.N.Y., Chong, W.W.F. & Lam, S.S., Microwave Processing of Oil Palm Wastes For Bioenergy Production and Circular Economy: Recent Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects, Bioresource Technology, 369, 128478, Feb. 2023.
  29. Davies, E., Deutz, P., & Zein, S.H., Single-Step Extraction–Esterification Process to Produce Biodiesel from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Using Microwave Heating: A Circular Economy Approach to Making Use of a Difficult Waste Product, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 12, pp. 2901-2911, Jul. 2022.
  30. Abas, F.Z., Ani, F.N. & Zakaria, Z.A., Microwave-Assisted Production of Optimized Pyrolysis Liquid Oil from Oil Palm Fiber, Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, pp. 404–413, May 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.052
  31. Usapein, P., Tuntiwiwattanapun, N., Polburee, P., Veerakul, P., Seekao, C. & Chavalparit, O., Transition Pathway Palm Oil Research Framework Toward a Bio-Circular-Green Economy Model Using SWOT Analysis: A Case Study of Thailand, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 877329, July 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.877329
  32. Ling, J.H., Lim, M.Y.T., Leong, M.W.K. & Sia, M.H.T., Effects of Adding Silica Fume and Empty Fruit Bunch to the Mix of Cement Brick, Indonesian Journal of Computing, Engineering and Design, 3(1), pp. 19-30, 2021. DOI: 10.35806/ijoced.v3i1.141
  33. Kanchymalay, K., Salim, N., Sukprasert, A., Krishnan, R. & Hashim, U.R.A., Multivariate Time Series Forecasting of Crude Palm Oil Price Using Machine Learning Techniques, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 226, 012117, 2017. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/226/1/012117
  34. Then, Y.Y., Ibrahim, N.A., Zainuddin, N., Ariffin, H., Yunus, W.M.Z.W. & Chieng, B.W., The Influence of Green Surface Modification of Oil Palm Mesocarp Fiber by Superheated Steam on the Mechanical Properties and Dimensional Stability of Oil Palm Mesocarp Fiber/Poly(butylene succinate) Biocomposite, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 15(9), pp. 15344-15357, Aug. 2014. DOI: 10.3390/ijms150915344
  35. Olafisoye, O.B., Oguntibeju, O.O. & Osibote, O.A., Assessment of Naturally Occurring Radionuclides Accumulation in Palm Oil from Soil, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 13(1), pp. 8–15, Feb. 2022. DOI: 10.18178/ijesd.2022.13.1.1365
  36. Altaee, N., Fahdil, A., Yousif, E. & Sudesh, K., Recovery and Subsequent Characterization of Polyhydroxybutyrate from Rhodococcus Equi Cells Grown on Crude Palm Kernel Oil, Journal of Taibah University for Science, 10(4), pp. 543-550, Apr. 2016.
  37. Syarifah-Noratiqah, S.B., Fairus, S., Zulfarina, M.S., Nasrullah, Z., Qodriyah, H.M.S. & Naina-Mohamed, I., The Effects of Palm Oil on Plasma and Serum Lipid Parameters: A Systematic Review on Animal Intervention Studies, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, pp. 303-1 – 303-16, Jul. 2020. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00303
  38. Chotikhun, A., Kittijaruwattana, J., Pianroj, Y., Tor, O., Birinci, E., Hengniran, P. & Lee, S.H., Some Properties of White and Torrefied Pellets Obtained from Oil Palm Trunk as Raw Material, Bioresources, 17(4), pp. 6818-6831, Oct. 2022. DOI: 10.15376/biores.17.4.6818-6831
  39. Hamdi, N.A., Sha’arani, S., Azman, N.F., Rafi, S.M., Norsin, E. & Othman, N., Management of Waste Cooking Oil and its Potential for Value-added Materials: A Mini Review, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1091, pp. 012054-1 – 012054-8, 2022.
  40. Kumar, S.S., Manasa, V., Tumaney, A.W., Bettadaiah, B.K., Chaudhari, S.R. & Giridhar, P., Chemical Composition, Nutraceuticals Characterization, NMR Confirmation of Squalene and Antioxidant Activities of Basella Rubra L. Seed Oil, RSC Advances, 10, pp. 31863–31873, Aug. 2020.
  41. Yang, R., Xue, L., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Qi, X., Jiang, J., Yu, L., Wang, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, Q. & Li, P., Phytosterol Contents of Edible Oils and Their Contributions to Estimated Phytosterol Intake in the Chinese Diet, Foods, 8(8), pp. 334-1 – 334-12, Aug. 2019. DOI: 10.3390/foods8080334
  42. Jamoussi, B., Jablaoui, C., Hajri, A.K., Chakroun, R., Al-Mur, B. & Allaf, K., Thermomechanical Autovaporization (MFA) as a Deodorization Process of Palm Oil, Foods, 11(24), pp. 3952-1 – 3952-17, Dec. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/foods11243952
  43. Harahap, F., Leduc, S., Mesfun, S., Khatiwada, D., Kraxner, F. & Silveira, S., Opportunities to Optimize the Palm Oil Supply Chain in Sumatra, Indonesia, Energies, 12(3), pp. 420-1 – 420-24, Jan. 2019. DOI: 10.3390/en12030420
  44. Wenten, I.G., Khoiruddin, K., Aryanti, P.T.P., Victoria, A.V. & Tanukusuma, G., Membrane-based Zero-Sludge Palm Oil Mill Plant, Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 36(2), pp. 237-263, Jan. 2020.
  45. Laaongnaun, S. & Patumsawad, S., Particulate Matter Characterization of the Combustion Emissions from Agricultural Waste Products, Heliyon, 8(8), pp. e10392-1 – e10392-8, 2022.
  46. Nasir, S., Hussein, M.Z., Zainal, Z., Yusof, N.A., Zobir, S.A.M. & Alibe, I.M., Potential Valorization of By-Product Materials from Oil Palm: A Review of Alternative and Sustainable Carbon Sources for Carbon-Based Nanomaterials Synthesis, Bioresources, 14(1), pp. 2352-2388, 2019. DOI: 10.15376/biores.14.1.nasir
  47. Sifau, M.O., Gbegbe, O.M., Ibrahim, H.O. & Adefila, O.O., Effluent from Local Palm Oil Mill Refinery in Nigeria is Excessively Oily and Potentially Genotoxic, Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 13(4), pp.10962-10962, 2021. DOI: 10.15835/nsb13410962
  48. Saad, M.S., Joe, N.C., Shuib, H.A., Wirzal, M.D.H., Putra, Z.A., Khan, M.R. & Busquets, R., Techno-Economic Analysis of An Integrated Electrocoagulation-Membrane System in Treatment of Palm Oil Mill Effluent, Journal of King Saud University-Science, 34(4), pp. 102015-1 – 102015-10, Jun. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102015
  49. Yuniarto, A., Noor, Z.Z., Ujang, Z., Olsson, G., Aris, A. & Hadibarata, T., Bio-Fouling Reducers for Improving the Performance of an Aerobic Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Treating Palm Oil Mill Effluent, Desalination, 316, pp. 146–153, May 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.02.002
  50. Moyer, P., Kim, K., Abdoulmoumine, N., Chmely, S.C., Long, B.K., Carrier, D.J. & Labbé, N., Structural Changes in Lignocellulosic Biomass During Activation with Ionic Liquids Comprising 3-Methylimidazolium Cations and Carboxylate Anions, Biotechnology for Biofuels, 11, pp. 265-1 – 265-13, Sep. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1263-0
  51. Ahmad, R., Hamidin, N., Ali, U.F.M. & Abidin, C.Z.A., Characterization of Bio-Oil from Palm Kernel Shell Pyrolysis, Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, 7(1), pp.1134-1140, 2014. DOI: 10.15282/jmes.7.2014.12.0110
  52. Hamzah, N.S., Idris, S.S., Rahman, N.A., Abu Bakar, N.F. & Matali, S., Thermal Analysis of Co-Utilization of Empty Fruit Bunch and Silantek Coal Under Inert Atmosphere Using Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA), Frontiers in Energy Research, 8, pp. 608756-1 – 608756-8, Feb. 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.608756
  53. Teow, Y.H., Wan Mohammad Hamdan, W.N.A. & Mohammad, A.W., Preparation of Palm Oil Industry’s Biomass-Based Graphene Composite for the Adsorptive Removal of Methylene Blue, Adsorption Science & Technology, 2021, pp. 9130233-1 – 9130233-11, Nov. 2021. DOI: 10.1155/2021/9130233
  54. Hosseini, S.E., Abdul Wahid, M., Jamil, M.M., Azli, A.A. & Misbah, M.F., A Review on Biomass-Based Hydrogen Production for Renewable Energy Supply, International Journal of Energy Research, 39(12), pp. 1597-1615, Aug. 2015. DOI: 10.1002/er.3381
  55. Iwuagwu, J.O. & Ugwuanyi, J.O., Treatment and Valorization of Palm Oil Mill Effluent through Production of Food Grade Yeast Biomass, Journal of Waste Management, 2014, pp. 439071-1 – 439071-9, Sep. 2014 DOI: 10.1155/2014/439071
  56. Saputera, W.H., Amri, A.F., Daiyan, R. & Sasongko, D., Photocatalytic Technology for Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Wastewater Treatment: Current Progress and Future Perspective, Materials, 14(11), pp. 2846-1 – 2486-35, May 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ma14112846
  57. Baines, T., Brown, S., Benedettini, O. & Ball, P.D., Examining Green Production and Its Role within The Competitive Strategy of Manufacturers, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 5(1), pp. 53-87, Mar. 2012. DOI: 10.3926/jiem.405
  58. Dzwigol, H., Trushkina, N. & Kwilinski, A., The Organizational and Economic Mechanism of Implementing the Concept of Green Logistics, Virtual Economics, 4, pp. 41-75, 2019.
  59. Bala, J.D., Lalung, J. & Ismail, N., Studies on the Reduction of Organic Load from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) by Bacterial Strains, International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 4, pp. 1-10, Dec. 2015.
  60. P Aryanti, P.T.P., Nugroho, F.A., Anwar, N., Rusgiyarto, F., Phalakornkule, C. & Kadier, A., Integrated Bipolar Electrocoagulation and PVC-Based Ultrafiltration Membrane Process for Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Treatment, Chemosphere, 347, 140637, Jan. 2024.
  61. Raketh, M., Kana, R., Kongjan, P., Muhammad, S.A.F.A.S., Sompong, O., Mamimin, C. & Jariyaboon, R., Enhancing Bio-Hydrogen and Bio-Methane Production of Concentrated Latex Wastewater (CLW) by Co-Digesting with Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME): Batch and Continuous Performance Test and ADM-1 Modeling, Journal of Environmental Management, 346, 119031, Nov. 2023.
  62. Yap, C.C., Loh, S.K., Chan, Y.J., Supramaniam, C.V., Soh, A.C., Chong, M.F., Lim, L.K. & Lim, J.W., Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Palm Oil Mill Effluent with Moringa Oleifera Filtrate in an Integrated Anaerobic–Aerobic Bioreactor, Bioenergy Research, 16, pp. 1922–1938, Dec. 2023.
  63. Tan, V.W.G., Chan, Y.J., Arumugasamy, S.K. & Lim, J.W., Optimizing Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent Utilizing Integrated Machine Learning and Response Surface Methodology Framework, Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137575, Aug. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137575
  64. Wajdi, M., Muda, K. & Fulazzaky, M.A., Mass Transfer Kinetics of Chemical Oxygen Demand Removed from Palm Oil Mill Effluent in Stirred Cylinder Batch Reactor, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 126, pp. 611-620, Oct. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2023.06.053
  65. Zulfahmi, I., El Rahimi, S.A., Suherman, S.D., Almunawarah, A., Sardi, A., Helmi, K., Nafis, B., Perdana, A.W., Adani, K.H., Nasution, I.A.A., Sumon, K.A. & Rahman, M.M., Acute Toxicity of Palm Oil Mill Effluent on Zebrafish (Danio Rerio Hamilton-Buchanan, 1822): Growth Performance, Behavioral Responses and Histopathological Lesions, Chemosphere, 340, 139788, Nov. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139788
  66. Afinogentov, A.A., Bagdasarova, Y.A., Derevyanov, M.Y. & Pleshivtseva, Y.E., Application of Neural Networks to Assess the Resource Value of Oil-Contaminated Waste Storage Facilities, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 988, 022073, 2022. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/988/2/022073
  67. Rene, E.R., Sarangi, P.K., Sanchez i Nogue, V., Schnürer, A. & Salvachúa, D., Current Trends in Waste Valorization, Microbial Biotechnology, 16(2), pp. 173-176, Feb. 2023.
  68. Streimikis, J. & Saraji, M.K., Green Productivity and Undesirable Outputs in Agriculture: A Systematic Review of DEA Approach and Policy Recommendations, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), pp. 819-853, 2022.
  69. Salguero-Puerta, L., Leyva-Díaz, J.C., Cortés-García, F.J., & Molina-Moreno, V., Sustainability Indicators Concerning Waste Management for Implementation of the Circular Economy Model on the University of Lome (Togo) Campus, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(12), 2234, Jun. 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16122234
  70. Petrariu, R., Constantin, M., Dinu, M., Pătărlăgeanu, S.R. & Deaconu, M.E., Water, Energy, Food, Waste Nexus: Between Synergy and Trade-Offs in Romania Based on Entrepreneurship and Economic Performance, Energies, 14(16), 5172, Aug. 2021.
  71. Leroy, L., Mille, C. & Fogliani, B., The Common Fruit-Piercing Moth in the Pacific Region: A Survey of the Current State of a Significant Worldwide Economic Pest, Eudocima phalonia (Lepidoptera: Erebidae), with a Focus on New Caledonia, Insects, 12(2), 117, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/insects12020117
  72. Ben-Ari, G., Biton, I., Many, Y., Namdar, D. & Samach, A., Elevated Temperatures Negatively Affect Olive Productive Cycle and Oil Quality, Agronomy, 11(8), 1492, Jul. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11081492
  73. Wei, C., Huang, J., Mansaray, L.R., Li, Z., Liu, W. & Han, J., Estimation and Mapping of Winter Oilseed Rape LAI from High Spatial Resolution Satellite Data Based on a Hybrid Method, Remote Sensing, 9(5), 488, May 2017. DOI: 10.3390/rs9050488
  74. Higginbottom, T.P., Adhikari, R. & Foster, T., Rapid Expansion of Irrigated Agriculture in The Senegal River Valley Following The 2008 Food Price Crisis, Environmental Research Letters, 18(1), 014037, 2023.
  75. Bisandre, S.M., Ingle, Y.V., Lande, G.K. & Giri, M.D., Pathogenicity of Eauveria Bassiana and Laboratory Assessment with Selective Pesticides, Science Asia, 49(1), pp. 22-28, Feb. 2023.
  76. Hu, H., Cao, A., Chen, S. & Li, H., Effects of Risk Perception of Pests and Diseases on Tea Famers’ Green Control Techniques Adoption, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8465, Jul. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148465
  77. Sangsri, S., Siripatana, C., Rakmak, N., Wadchasit, P., & Jijai, S., Evaluating Biomethane Potential of Inocula from Different Active Biogas Digesters for Palm Oil Mill Effluent by BMP and SMA: Effect of Dilution and Sources, Walailak Journal of Science and Technology, 18(1), pp. 6515-1 – 6515-12, Jan. 2021. DOI: 10.48048/wjst.2021.6515
  78. Ali, A.A.M., Zainudin, M.H.M., Idris, A., Baharuddin, A.S., Sulaiman, A., Matsui, T., Osaka, N., Oshibe, H., Hassan, M.A. & Shirai, Y., Enhanced Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent Supplemented with Untreated Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Biomass with a Change in the Microbial Community, Japan Journal of Food Engineering, 13, pp. 37-41, 2012. DOI: 10.11301/jsfe.13.37
  79. F Bukit, F.R., Fahmi, F. & Sipayung, J., Feasibility Study of Biogas Power Plant Using Anaerobic Digester Method with Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) (Case Study of Pt. Perkebunan Nusantara III PKS Sei Silau North Sumatera), AIP Conference Proceedings, 2741(1), 040004, Jul. 2023.
  80. Fahrunsyah, F., Kusuma, Z., Prasetya, B. & Handayanto, E., Utilization of Coal Fly Ash and Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Compost to Improve Uptake of Soil Phosphorus and Yield of Maize Grown on an Ultisol, Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20(6), pp. 36-43, Jul. 2019. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/108635
  81. Hastuti, P.B. & Rohmiyati, S.M., Application of Empty Fruit Bunches Compost and Types of P Fertilizer on the Growth and Phosphorus Uptake in Oil Palm Seedlings, Agrotechnology Research Journal, 4(2), pp. 59-64, Dec. 2020. DOI: 10.20961/agrotechresj.v4i2.40784
  82. Siddiqui, Y., Meon, S., Mohd, R.I., Rahmani, M. & Ali, S., Efficient Conversion of Empty Fruit Bunch of Oil Palm into Fertilizer Enriched Compost, Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences, 11(2), pp. 247-252, 2009.
  83. Lew, J.H., May, A.K.A., Shamsuddin, M.R., Lazim, A.M. & Narasimba, M.M., Vermicomposting of Palm Oil Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB) Based Fertilizer with Various Organics Additives, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 736(5), 052014., Mar. 2020. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/736/5/052014
  84. Yong, G.T.X., Chan, Y.J., Lau, P.L., Ethiraj, B., Ghfar, A.A., Mohammed, A.A., Shahid, M.K. & Lim, J.W., Optimization of the Performances of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME)-Based Biogas Plants Using Comparative Analysis and Response Surface Methodology, Processes, 11(6), 1603, May 2023. DOI: 10.3390/pr11061603
  85. Diansyah, A.N., Optimization Rate of Empty Fruit Bunch and NPK Compound Fertilizer for 4-Years-Old Oil Palm, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 694(1), 012036, Mar. 2021. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/694/1/012036
  86. Foong, S.Z., Chong, M.F. & Ng, D.K., Strategies to Promote Biogas Generation and Utilisation from Palm Oil Mill Effluent, Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 5, pp. 175-191, Jul. 2021. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10592
  87. Nasrin, A.B., Raman, A.A.A., Bukhari, N.A., Sukiran, M.A., Buthiyappan, A., Subramaniam, V., Aziz, A.A. & Loh, S.K., A Critical Analysis on Biogas Production and Utilisation Potential from Palm Oil Mill Effluent, Journal of Cleaner Production, 361, 132040, Aug. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132040
  88. Sharvini, S.R., Noor, Z.Z., Chong, C.S., Stringer, L.C. & Glew, D., Energy Generation from Palm Oil Mill Effluent: A Life Cycle Assessment of Two Biogas Technologies, Energy, 191, 116513, Jan. 2020.
  89. Chin, M.J., Poh, P.E., Tey, B.T., Chan, E.S. & Chin, K.L., Biogas from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME): Opportunities and Challenges from Malaysia’s Perspective, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, pp. 717-726, Oct. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.008
  90. Ahmed, Y., Yaakob, Z., Akhtar, P. & Sopian, K., Production of Biogas and Performance Evaluation of Existing Treatment Processes in Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME), Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, pp. 1260-1278, Feb. 2015.
  91. Yoshizaki, T., Shirai, Y., Hassan, M.A., Baharuddin, A.S., Abdullah, N.M.R., Sulaiman, A. & Busu, Z., Improved Economic Viability of Integrated Biogas Energy and Compost Production for Sustainable Palm Oil Mill Management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 44, pp. 1-7, 2013.
  92. Qasim, M., Clarkson, A.N. & Hinkley, S.F., Green Synthesis of Carbon Nanoparticles (CNPs) from Biomass for Biomedical Applications, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(2) pp. 1023, Jan. 2023. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021023
  93. Nasir, S., Hussein, M.Z., Zainal, Z., Yusof, N.A. & Mohd Zobir, S.A., Electrochemical Energy Storage Potentials of Waste Biomass: Oil Palm Leaf- and Palm Kernel Shell-Derived Activated Carbons, Energies, 11(12), 3410, Dec. 2018. DOI: 10.3390/en11123410
  94. Idris, M.O., Ibrahim, M.N.M., Noh, N.A.M., Yaqoob, A.A. & Hussin, M.H., Synthesis and Fabrication of Palm Kernel Shell-Derived Modified Electrodes: A Practical Step Towards The Industrialization of Microbial Fuel Cells, Chemical Engineering Journal, 475, 146321, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.146321
  95. Awere, E., Obeng, P.A. & Bonoli, A., Application of Palm Kernel Shell Granular Filter Medium for Decolourisation and COD Removal from Clarified Palm Oil Mill Effluent, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 14(5), pp. 329-339, Oct. 2023. DOI: 10.18178/ijesd.2023.14.5.1452
  96. Shabbani, H.J.K., Abd, A.A., Rajalingam, T.R., Kim, J., Othman, M.R. & Helwani, Z., Carbon Dioxide Capture from Industrial Flue Gas Surrogate by Multi-Cyclical PSA Mediated by Microporous Palm Kernel Shell and ZIF-8 Media, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 126 (2023) 249–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2023.06.014
  97. Khankhaje, E., Kim, T., Jang, H. & Rafieizonooz, M., Laboratory Evaluation of Heavy Metal Removal from Stormwater Runoff by Pervious Concrete Pavement Containing Seashell and Oil Palm Kernel Shell, Construction and Building Materials, 400,132648, Oct. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132648
  98. Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Tan, Y.H., Kansedo, J., Mubarak, N.M., Liew, R.K., Yek, P.N.Y., Aghbashlo, M., Ng, H.S., Chong, W.W.F., Lam, S.S. & Verma, M., Assessing Biodiesel Production using Palm Kernel Shell-Derived Sulfonated Magnetic Biochar from the Life Cycle Assessment Perspective, Energy, 282, 128758, Nov. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128758
  99. Foffi, R., Savuto, E., Stante, M., Mancini, R. & Gallucci, K., Study of Energy Valorization of Disposable Masks via Thermochemical Processes: Devolatilization Tests and Simulation Approach, Energies, 15(6), 2103, Mar. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/en15062103
  100. Shahbeig, H., Shafizadeh, A., Rosen, M.A. & Sels, B.F., Exergy Sustainability Analysis of Biomass Gasification: A Critical Review, Biofuel Research Journal, 9, pp. 1592-1607, Mar. 2022. DOI: 10.18331/brj2022.9.1.5
  101. Enam, R.N., Tahir, M., Hasan Rizvi, H., Rafique, A. & Mustafa, S.M.N., A Sustainable Way to Generate Energy through Biomass Flash Pyrolysis in South Asia: A Green Energy Technology, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(5), pp. 274-279, Aug. 2022. DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.13335
  102. Phadtare, P.D. & Kalbande, S.R., Biochar Production Technologies from Agricultural Waste, Its Utilization in Agriculture and Current Global Biochar Market: A Comprehensive Review, International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 12(11), pp. 1010-1031, Aug. 2022. DOI: 10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i1131078
  103. Gali, L., Pirozzi, A. & Donsì, F., Biopolymer- and Lipid-Based Carriers for the Delivery of Plant-Based Ingredients, Pharmaceutics, 15(3), pp. 927-1 – 927-39, Mar. 2023. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030927
  104. Chedea, V.S., Tomoiagǎ, L.L., Macovei, Ş.O., Mǎgureanu, D.C., Iliescu, M.L., Bocsan, I.C., Buzoianu, A.D., Voşloban, C.M. & Pop, R.M., Antioxidant/Pro-Oxidant Actions of Polyphenols From Grapevine and Wine By-Products-Base for Complementary Therapy in Ischemic Heart Diseases, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 8, 750508, Nov. 2021.
  105. García-Vargas, M.C., Contreras, M.D.M. & Castro, E., Therapeutic Bio-Compounds from Avocado Residual Biomass, in: The 1st International Electronic Conference on Biomolecules: Natural and Bio-Inspired Therapeutics for Human Diseases, Proceedings, 79(1), pp. 4-1 – 4-6, 2021.
  106. Ehsan, M., & Chowdhury, M.T.H., Production of Biodiesel Using Alkaline Based Catalysts From Waste Cooking Oil: A Case Study, Procedia Engineering, 105, pp. 638–645, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.05.042
  107. Kokkinos, N., Theochari, G., Emmanouilidou, E., Angelova, D., Toteva, V., Lazaridou, A. & Mitkidou, S., Biodiesel Production from High Free Fatty Acid Byproduct of Bioethanol Production Process, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1123(1), 012009, Dec. 2022. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1123/1/012009
  108. Soesanto, H., Maarif, M.S., Anwar, S. & Yurianto, Y., Current Status of Household E-Waste Management in Jakarta, Indonesia, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1109(1), 012042, Nov. 2022. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1109/1/012042
  109. Preka, R., Fiorentino, G., De Carolis, R. & Barberio, G., The Challenge of Plastics in a Circular Perspective, Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4, pp. 920242-1 – 920242-7, Aug. 2022. DOI: 10.3389/frsc.2022.920242
  110. Van Thanh, N., Le, D.T. & Tinh, L., Quantifying Factors Affecting Satisfaction of People to Waste Classification at Source: The Case of Hai Chau District, Da Nang, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 13(2), pp. 42-48, Apr. 2022. DOI: 10.18178/ijesd.2022.13.2.1370
  111. Panghal, A., Sindhu, S., Dahiya, S., Dahiya, B. & Mor, R.S., Benchmarking the Interactions among Challenges for Blockchain Technology Adoption: A Circular Economy Perspective, International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 7, pp. 859–872, 2022. DOI: 10.33889/ijmems.2022.7.6.054
  112. Abideen, A.Z., Pyeman, J., Sundram, V.P.K., Tseng, M.L. & Sorooshian, S., Leveraging Capabilities of Technology into a Circular Supply Chain to Build Circular Business Models: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review, Sustainability, 13, pp. 8997-1 – 8997-26, Aug. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/su13168997
  113. Onyelowe, K.C., Kontoni, D.P.N., Ebid, A.M., Dabbaghi, F., Soleymani, A., Jahangir, H. & Nehdi, M.L., Multi-Objective Optimization of Sustainable Concrete Containing Fly Ash Based on Environmental and Mechanical Considerations, Buildings, 12(7), pp. 948-1 – 948-25, Jul. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/buildings12070948
  114. Amran, M., Lee, Y.H., Fediuk, R., Murali, G., Mosaberpanah, M.A., Ozbakkaloglu, T., Yong Lee, Y., Vatin, N., Klyuev, S. & Karelia, M., Palm Oil Fuel Ash-Based Eco-Friendly Concrete Composite: A Critical Review of the Long-Term Properties, Materials, 14(22), pp. 7074-1 – 7074-29, Nov. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ma14227074
  115. Al-Fayad, F.S., The European Union’s GDPR and Its Effect on Data-Driven Marketing Strategies, International Journal of Marketing Studies, 12, pp. 39-51, Feb. 2020. DOI: 10.5539/ijms.v12n1p39
  116. Adlie, T.A., Ali, N., Huzni, S., Ikramullah, I. & Rizal, S., Impact of Zinc Oxide Addition on Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches Foamed Polymer Composites for Automotive Interior Parts, Polymers, 15(2), pp. 422-1 – 422-20, Jan. 2023. DOI: 10.3390/polym15020422
  117. Tiozzo, S., Sanchetti, S., Picicco, M., Zanforlin, M., Bemporad, E., Zacco, A. & Depero, L.E., Basaltic Glass Fibers from Industrial Wastes: A Laboratory-Scale Technical Feasibility Study, Crystals, 12(3), pp. 359-1 – 359-13, Mar. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/cryst12030359
  118. Sadh, P.K., Duhan, S. & Duhan, J.S., Agro-Industrial Wastes and Their Utilization using Solid State Fermentation: A Review, Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 5(1), pp.1-15, Jan. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-017-0187-z
  119. Putro, F.A., Pranolo, S.H., Waluyo, J. & Setyawan, A., Thermodynamic Study of Palm Kernel Shell Gasification for Aggregate Heating in an Asphalt Mixing Plant, International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 9(2), pp. 311-317, May 2020. DOI: 10.14710/ijred.9.2.311-317
  120. Muslim, M.B., Saleh, S. & Samad, N.A.F.A., Torrefied Biomass Gasification: A Simulation Study by Using Empty Fruit Bunch, MATEC Web of Conferences, 131, pp. 03008-1 – 03008-6, Oct. 2017. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201713103008
  121. Ghouili, E., Abid, G., Hogue, R., Jeanne, T., D’Astous-Pagé, J., Sassi, K., Hidri, Y., M’Hamed, H.C., Somenahally, A., Xue, Q. & Jebara, M., Date Palm Waste Compost Application Increases Soil Microbial Community Diversity in a Cropping Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Field, Biology, 12(4), pp. 546-1 – 546-21, Apr. 2023.
  122. Supriatna, J., Setiawati, M.R., Sudirja, R., Suherman, C. & Bonneau, X., Composting for a More Sustainable Palm Oil Waste Management: A Systematic Literature Review, The Scientific World Journal, 2022, pp. 5073059-1 – 5073059-20, Nov. 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5073059
  123. Wan, X., Ping, Y. & Li, J., Effect of Ozone Treatment on the Properties of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Sulfonated Chemi-Mechanical Pulp, Forests, 12(8), pp. 1085-1 – 1085-12, Aug. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/f12081085
  124. Elgharbawy, A.A., Alam, M.Z., Moniruzzaman, M. & Salleh, H.M., Hydrolysis Kinetics of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch in Ionic Liquids and Cellulase Integrated System, International Journal of Chemistry, 11(2), pp. 95 – 105, Nov. 2019. DOI: 10.5539/ijc.v11n2p95
  125. Hussain, M., Levacher, D., Leblanc, N., Zmamou, H., Djeran-Maigre, I., Razakamanantsoa, A. & Saouti, L., Properties of Mexican Tropical Palm Oil Flower and Fruit Fibers for Their Prospective Use in Eco-Friendly Construction Material, Fibers, 9(11), pp. 63-1 – 63-16, Oct. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/fib9110063
  126. Chaiwong, W., Samoh, N., Eksomtramage, T. & Kaewtatip, K., Surface-Treated Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fiber Improved Tensile Strength and Water Resistance of Wheat Gluten-Based Bioplastic, Composites Part B: Engineering, 176, pp. 107331-1 – 107331-7, Nov. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107331
  127. Yang, J., Ching, Y.C., Chuah, C.H., Hai, N.D., Singh, R. & Nor, A.R.M., Preparation and Characterization of Starch-Based Bioplastic Composites with Treated Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fibers and Citric Acid, Cellulose, 28, pp. 4191-4210, Mar. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-021-03816-8
  128. VValle, V., Aguilar, A., Kreiker, J., Raggiotti, B. & Cadena, F., Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch (OPEFB) Fiber-Reinforced Acrylic Thermoplastic Composites: Effect of Salt Fog Aging on Tensile, Spectrophotometric, and Thermogravimetric Properties, Int J Polym Sci, 2022, pp. 6372264-1 – 6372264-18, Apr. 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6372264
  129. Harahap, M., Perangin-Angin, Y.A., Purwandari, V., Goei, R. & Gea, S., Acetylated Lignin From Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches and Its Electrospun Nanofibres With PVA: Potential Carbon Fibre Precursor, Heliyon, 9(3), pp. e14556-1 – e14556-9, Mar. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14556
  130. Tan, J.Y., Tey, W.Y., Panpranot, J., Lim, S. & Lee, K.M., Valorization of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch for Cellulose Fibers: A Reinforcement Material in Polyvinyl Alcohol Biocomposites for Its Application as Detergent Capsules, Sustainability, 14(18), pp. 11446-1 – 11446-20, Sep. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/su141811446
  131. Ikiz Kaya, D., Pintossi, N. & Dane, G., An Empirical Analysis of Driving Factors and Policy Enablers of Heritage Adaptive Reuse within the Circular Economy Framework, Sustainability, 13(5), pp. 2479-1 – 2479-24, Feb. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/su13052479
  132. Radzuan, M.N., Winterburn, J. & Banat, I., Bioreactor Rhamnolipid Production Using Palm Oil Agricultural Refinery By-Products, Processes, 9(11), pp. 2037-1 – 2037-15, Nov. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/pr9112037
  133. Chong, J.W.R., Chan, Y.J., Chong, S., Ho, Y.C., Mohamad, M., Tan, W.N., Cheng, C.K. & Lim, J.W., Simulation and Optimisation of Integrated Anaerobic-Aerobic Bioreactor (IAAB) for the Treatment of Palm Oil Mill Effluent, Processes, 9(7), pp. 1124-1 – 1124-19, Jun. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/pr9071124
  134. Chaipetch, W., Jaiyu, A., Jutaporn, P., Heran, M. & Khongnakorn, W., Fouling Behavior in a High-Rate Anaerobic Submerged Membrane Bioreactor (AnMBR) for Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Treatment, Membranes, 11(9), pp. 649-1 – 649-15, Aug. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/membranes11090649
  135. Wongfaed, N., Kongjan, P., Suksong, W., Prasertsan, P. & Sompong, O., Strategies for Recovery of Imbalanced Full-Scale Biogas Reactor Feeding with Palm Oil Mill Effluent, PeerJ, 9, pp. e10592-1 – e10592-39, Jan. 2021. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10592
  136. Katengua-Thamahane, E., Marnewick, J.L., Ajuwon, O.R., Chegou, N.N., Szűcs, G., Ferdinandy, P., Csont, T., Csonka, C. & Van Rooyen, J., The Combination of Red Palm Oil and Rooibos Show Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Rats, Journal of Inflammation, 11, pp. 41-1 – 41-12, Dec. 2014. DOI: 10.1186/s12950-014-0041-4
  137. Abreu, M., Silva, L., Ribeiro, B., Ferreira, A., Alves, L., Paixão, S.M., Gouveia, L., Moura, P., Carvalheiro, F., Duarte, L.C., Fernando, A.L., Reis, A. & Gírio, F., Low Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) Energy Crops to Bioenergy and Biofuels—A Review, Energies, 15(12), pp. 4348-1 – 4348-68, Jun. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/en15124348
  138. Porto, M., Caputo, P., Loise, V., Abe, A.A., Tarsi, G., Sangiorgi, C., Gallo, F. & Oliviero Rossi, C., Preliminary Study on New Alternative Binders through Re-Refined Engine Oil Bottoms (REOBs) and Industrial By-Product Additives, Molecules, 26(23), pp. 7269-1 – 7269-20, Nov. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237269
  139. Marszałek-Harych, A., Jędrzkiewicz, D. & Ejfler, J., Bio- and Chemocatalysis Cascades As A Bridge Between Biology and Chemistry for Green Polymer Synthesis, Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, 22, pp. 28-1 – 28-14, Dec, 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s11658-017-0061-1
  140. Carvalho Neto, D.P.D., Gonot-Schoupinsky, X.P. & Gonot-Schoupinsky, F.N., Coffee as a Naturally Beneficial and Sustainable Ingredient in Personal Care Products: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Evidence, Frontiers in Sustainability, 2, pp. 697092-1 – 697092-22, Oct. 2021. DOI: 10.3389/frsus.2021.697092
  141. Chen, P., Chen, W., Jiang, S., Zhong, Q., Chen, H. & Chen, W., Synergistic Effect of Laccase and Sugar Beet Pectin on the Properties of Concentrated Protein Emulsions and Its Application in Concentrated Coconut Milk, Molecules, 23(10), pp. 2591-1 – 2591-15, Oct. 2018. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102591
  142. Isaac, G., Assessing Environmental and Social Impacts of the Oil Palm Industry in Ghana: A Project Synthesis, African Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(8), pp.632-641, Feb. 2017. DOI: 10.5897/ajar2016.11845
  143. Tangga, C.K., Mohidin, H. & Abdullah, S., The Effect of Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB) Compost and Trichoderma Biofertilizer on Growth and Yield Performance of Chili (Capsicum annuum L. Var. Kulai), IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1114(1), pp. 012070-1 - 012070-12, Dec. 2022. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1114/1/012070
  144. Abad-Segura, E., Fuente, A.B.D.L., González-Zamar, M.D. & Belmonte-Ureña, L.J., Effects of Circular Economy Policies on the Environment and Sustainable Growth: Worldwide Research, Sustainability, 12(14), pp. 5792-1 – 5792-27, Jul. 2020. DOI: 10.3390/su12145792
  145. Pavolová, H., Bakalár, T., Šimková, Z. & Tokarčík, A., Model of Raw Material Exploitation for the Support of Sustainable Development, Applied Sciences, 11(17), pp. 7919-1 – 7919-15, Aug. 2021.
  146. Ramkumar, S., Influence of Inter-Firm Network Relationships on Circular Economy Eco-Innovation Adoption, Sustainability, 12(18), pp. 7607-1 – 7607-22, Sep. 2020. DOI: 10.3390/su12187607
  147. Wan Ismail, W.M.S. & Abdul Rasid, R., Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB) Gasification in an Entrained Flow Gasification System, Chemical Engineering Research Bulletin, 19, pp. 43 – 49, Sep. 2017. DOI: 10.3329/cerb.v19i0.33775
  148. Chuayboon, S. & Abanades, S., Continuous Solar-Driven Gasification of Oil Palm Agricultural Bio Waste For High-Quality Syngas Production, Waste Management, 154, pp. 303-311, Dec. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.10.015
  149. Im-Orb, K. & Arpornwichanop, A., Production of Bio-Dimethyl Ether from Oil Palm Residue via Integrated Gasification and Direct DME Synthesis Process, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2827(1), pp. 040008, Sep. 2023. DOI: 10.1063/5.0164822
  150. Kamaruzaman, N. & Abdul Manaf, N., Optimal Behavioral Performance and Power Generation Potential from Palm Oil Mill Industry: Case Study Using Downdraft Gasification with Power Generation, International Journal of Green Energy, 21(5), pp. 929-947, 2024.
  151. Chuayboon, S. & Abanades, S., Carbon-Neutral Synfuel Production via Continuous Solar H2O and CO2 Gasification of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch, Energy, 281, pp. 128212-1 – 128212-12, Oct. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128212
  152. Umar, H.A., Sulaiman, S.A., Said, M.A., Gungor, A., Ahmad, R.K. & Inayat, M., Syngas Production from Gasification and Co-Gasification of Oil Palm Trunk and Frond Using a Down-Draft Gasifier, International Journal of Energy Research, 45(5), pp.8103-8115, Dec. 2020.
  153. Mujtaba, G., Hayat, R., Hussain, Q. & Ahmed, M., Physio-Chemical Characterization of Biochar, Compost and Co-Composted Biochar Derived from Green Waste, Sustainability, 13(9), pp. 4628-1 – 4628-22, Apr. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/su13094628
  154. Radzuan, M.N., Banat, I.M. & Winterburn, J., Biorefining Palm Oil Agricultural Refinery Waste for Added Value Rhamnolipid Production via Fermentation, Industrial Crops and Products, 116, pp. 64–72, Jun. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.045
  155. Kee, S.H., Ganeson, K., Rashid, N.F.M., Yatim, A.F.M., Vigneswari, S., Amirul, A.A.A., Ramakrishna, S. & Bhubalan, K., A Review on Biorefining of Palm Oil and Sugar Cane Agro-Industrial Residues by Bacteria into Commercially Viable Bioplastics and Biosurfactants, Fuel, 321, pp. 124039, Aug. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124039
  156. Suhartini, S., Rohma, N.A., Mardawati, E., Hidayat, N. & Melville, L., Biorefining of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches for Bioethanol and Xylitol Production in Indonesia: A Review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 154, pp. 111817, Feb. 2022.
  157. Thanapimmetha, A., Khomlaem, C., Saisriyoot, M., Naktham, N. & Srinophakun, P., Improved Bioethanol Production from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch using Different Fermentation Strategies, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 57(4), pp. 689-696, Aug. 2023. DOI: 10.34044/j.anres.2023.57.4.13
  158. Wilaithup, A., Sultan, I.N., Tareen, A.K., Laemsak, N., Sirisansaneeyakul, S., Vanichsriratana, W. & Parakulsuksatid, P., Bioethanol Production from Oil Palm Trunk Fibers Using Activated Immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae SC90 Under Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation, BioEnergy Research, 15(4), pp.1972-1981, Jan. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s12155-021-10379-w
  159. Saelee, N., Lactic Acid Production from Old Oil Palm Trunk Sap in the Open Batch, Open Repeated Batch, Fed-Batch, and Repeated Fed-Batch Fermentation by Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 10863, Fermentation, 8(9), pp. 430-1 – 430-11, Aug. 2022.
  160. Ahmad, T., Masoodi, F.A., Rather, S.A., Wani, S.M. & Gull, A., Supercritical Fluid Extraction: A Review, Journal of Biological and Chemical Chronicles, 5(1), pp. 114-122, May 2019.
  161. Creencia, E.C., Nillama, J.A.P. & Librando, I.L., Microwave-Assisted Extraction and Physicochemical Evaluation of Oil from Hevea brasiliensis Seeds, Resources, 7(2), pp. 28-1 - 28-12, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/resources7020028
  162. Davarnejad, R., Niza, N.M., Arpanahzadeh, S. & Zakeri, M., Supercritical Fluid Extraction of β-Carotene from Crude Palm Oil Using CO2 in A Bubbler Extractor: Mass Transfer Study, Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 33(4), pp. 79-87, 2014.
  163. Birtigh, A., Johannsen, M., Brunner, G. & Nair, N., Supercritical-Fluid Extraction of Oil-Palm Components, The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 8(1), pp. 46-50, Mar. 1995. DOI: 10.1016/0896-8446(95)90049-7
  164. Davarnejad, R., Kassim, K.M., Zainal, A. & Sata, S.A., Supercritical fluid extraction of β-carotene from crude palm oil using CO2, Journal of Food Engineering, 89(4), pp.472-478, Dec. 2008.
  165. Davarnejad, R., Ahmad, Z., Sata, S.A., Moraveji, M.K. & Ahmadloo, F., Mutual Solubility Study in Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Tocopherols from Crude Palm Oil using CO2 Solvent, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 11(10), pp. 3649-3659, Sep. 2010. DOI: 10.3390/ijms11103649
  166. Akanda, M.J.H., Sarker, M.Z.I., Ferdosh, S., Manap, M.Y.A., Ab Rahman, N.N.N. & Ab Kadir, M.O., Applications of Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE) of Palm Oil and Oil from Natural Sources, Molecules, 17(2), pp. 1764-1794, 2012. DOI: 10.3390/molecules17021764
  167. Krishnaiah, D., Bono, A., Sarbatly, R. & Fadhilah, S., Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Palm Kernel Oil from Palm Kernel Cake, American Journal of Food Technology, 7, pp. 168-172, 2012. DOI: 10.3923/ajft.2012.168.172
  168. Wong, R.H., Tan, K.J., Guo, X.X., Gan, C.H., Bashir, M.J., Zheng, P. & Ng, C.A., Enhancement of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor Performance using Microbe Activator in Palm Oil Mill Effluent Treatment, Desalination and Water Treatment, 281, pp. 58-69, Jan. 2023. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2023.29145
  169. Kim, D., Yu, J.H., Hong, K.S., Jung, C.D., Kim, H., Kim, J. & Myung, S., Green Production of Low-Molecular-Weight Xylooligosaccharides from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch via Integrated Enzymatic Polymerization and Membrane Separation for Purification, Separation and Purification Technology, 293, 121084, Jul. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121084
  170. N Roli, N.F.M., Yussof, H.W., Saufi, S.M., Seman, M.A. & Mohammad, A.W., Recovery of Xylose from Oil Palm Frond (OPF) Bagasse Hydrolysate using Commercial Spiral-Wound Nanofiltration Membrane, Mohammad, A., Haan, T.Y., Hilal, N., eds., Nanofiltration for Sustainability: Reuse, Recycle and Resource Recovery, CRC Press, pp. 235-246, 2023.
  171. Razman, K.K., Hanafiah, M.M., Mohammad, A.W. & Lun, A.W., Life Cycle Assessment of an Integrated Membrane Treatment System of Anaerobic-Treated Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME), Membranes, 12(2), pp. 246-1 – 246-20, Feb. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/membranes12020246
  172. de Oliveira Neto, G.C., Teixeira, M.M., Souza, G.L.V., Arns, V.D., Tucci, H.N.P. & Amorim, M., Assessment of The Eco-Efficiency of The Circular Economy in The Recovery of Cellulose from The Shredding of Textile Waste, Polymers, 14, pp. 1317-1 – 1317-15, Mar. 2022.
  173. Clodoveo, M.L., Crupi, P., Annunziato, A. & Corbo, F., Innovative Extraction Technologies for Development of Functional Ingredients Based on Polyphenols from Olive Leaves, Foods, 11(1), pp. 103-1 – 103-26, Dec. 2022.
  174. Islam, K., Industrial Symbiosis: A Review on Uncovering Approaches, Opportunities, Barriers and Policies, Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 2(1), pp. 011-019, Apr. 2016. DOI: 10.17352/2455-488x.000009
  175. Kim, M. & Chai, S., Implementing Environmental Practices for Accomplishing Sustainable Green Supply Chain Management, Sustainability, 9(7), pp. 1192-1 – 1192-17, Jul. 2017. DOI: 10.3390/su9071192
  176. Akolgo, G.A., Uba, F., Awafo, E.A., Asosega, K.A., Kemausuor, F., Kumi, F. & Adu-Poku, K.A., Energy Analysis for Efficient Mechanisation of Palm Oil Extraction in Ghana: Targeting Circular Economy, Energy Reports, 10, pp. 4800-4807, Nov. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.11.018