1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol 57 (2025) Issue 1
  4. Articles

Mechanical Behavior of Concrete Reinforced with Natural Palm and Mango Fibers

Abstract

The search for new natural materials as reinforcement in concrete has increased as an economic and ecological alternative. The purpose of this work is to study the behavior of natural mango (mangifera indica) and palm fibers without treatment, incorporated into concrete to improve its mechanical properties. The physical properties of the coarse (gravel) and fine (sand) aggregates were analyzed, as well as the physical and mechanical characteristics of the fibers used in this research. Concrete mixtures were prepared incorporating 0.2% and 0.4% fiber content with respect to the weight of fine aggregate and a fiber length of 10 and 30 mm respectively. The experimental results showed that all the fibers used in different concentrations decreased the workability and air content of the concrete paste, consequently, the porosity had a downward trend. Short mango fibers at 0.4% concentration and palm fiber at 0.2% increase the compressive strength by 12% compared to the control sample.

Keywords

Introduction

Agricultural remains and wastes (peels, bones, damaged or low quality fruits and vegetables) whose elimination has a negative impact on the environment and the economy, since no policies exist for the proper management and disposal and most of the time these wastes are discarded and disposed in open air waste disposal lands without any control (Difonzo et al., 2022; Martinez et al., 2012). One of the ways to reduce the negative impact of the construction sector on the environment is to use waste materials, which is an attractive alternative to disposal in that cost and pollution problems (Colangelo et al., 2021). In the search of alternatives, natural fiber reinforced concrete used to be obtained from abundant renewable sources, resources, which allows for continuous supply and substantial cost savings for composite sectors (Asyraf et al., 2022). Fibers are rope-like materials that can be used for different purposes, provided by plants (vegetables, leaves and wood) (Ahamed et al., 2021). Some of the most used fibers in concrete are coconut (Aslam et al., 2023; Ahmad et al., 2022; Ali et al., 2022), sugarcane bagasse (Perez et al., 2022; Ahmed et al., 2022), plantain (Elbehiry et al., 2020; Akinyemi and Dai, 2020), among others. However, in recent decades, new studies of natural fibrous alternative materials from agro-industrial waste have been analyzed that contain specific characteristics, which improve their mechanical properties and resistance to fracture (Luhar et al., 2020).

Plant production industries generate a large amount of waste such as stems, leaves or fruits (Mejías-Brizuela et al., 2016). According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2021), Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is the most predominant tropical fruit in the world, with a production of 41 million tons in 2020 where Mexico is one of the main producers with 2 million tons (SIAP, 2021). Depending on the mango variety, 33-85% is pulp, 7-24% is peel, and 9-40% is seeds (García-Mehecha et al., 2023). The mango industry is based on the processing and use of the edible part of the fruit, mainly to obtain the pulp, juice and nectar. According to a study of the Mango agro-food chain, approximately 40% of the raw material is wasted in Mexico (Pacheco-Jiménez et al., 2022).

Likewise, the guano palm is a genus of palms distributed in the southwest of the United States, Mexico, the Antilles, and northern Colombia and Venezuela (Escalante, 2018). The adult leaves are used for thatching rural houses and the

immature leaves are used for various crafts such as making brooms, hats, furniture, house roofs, mats, and bows. The manufacture of these crafts generates volumes of waste estimated at 1,540 tons nationwide, mainly in the central and southern regions of Mexico, since there is no process for their use, they end up in landfills or are incinerated (Sustaita Rivera, 2009).

Therefore, these materials may be used as reinforcement through fibers for the production of concrete, these fibers are generally added to the cement paste in low volumes (frequently less than 1%) showing control over cracking, and spawling due to temperature contraction effects, increasing its resistance, ductility, and tenacity (Ede and Agbede, 2015).

The optimum fiber dosage is important as a higher dosage causes a decrease in the mechanical and durability performances of concrete due to lack of flowability (Ahmad et al., 2022). Parameters describing fiber characteristics are length, diameter, and appearance or slenderness, that is the consequence of the existing ratio of the length to the diameter, as well as the constitution by a complex association of polymeric substances and the chemical composition varying as a function of type and origin of these fibers (García and Salcedo, 2006). Hasan et al. (2022) analyzed two types of ramie and abaca fibers incorporated in concrete at 0.15%, 0.3% and 0.45%, and based on their results, the addition of low volumes of these fibers in concrete mixes improved the compression and flexural mechanical properties.

Lumingkewas et al. (2017) studied the effect of 20 and 40 mm length coconut fiber additions in concrete demonstrating the decrease in tensile strength. Juarez et al. (2003) studied the addition of lettuce fibers in cement compounds, obtaining good results in the flexural strength, and concluded that the reduction in the alkaline matrix effect and the fibers hydrophilic quality is to isolate fibers with different chemical compounds. In another investigation, Herrera and Quispe (2019), found that use of agave natural fibers in small quantities of 0.1% increased the compressive strength, reflecting less permeability in the paste treated. In studies by Jimenez and Torres (2020), additions of sugar cane bagasse produced an inversely proportional reaction in the concrete compression resistance, that is for a greater fiber quantity the resistance diminishes, being the optimal percent between 0.5 to 2.5%. Mansour et al. (2017) in their study concluded that 1% alpha fiber added in concrete improves fracture toughness better than 2% fiber reinforcement.

Marroquín and Lopez (2019) analyzed concrete mechanical properties using bejuco fibers, concluding that the mixture with concrete produced a less malleable mixture due to the absorption capacity of fibers, recommending 0.3% of fibers within the total weight of the mixture. Trabelsi and Kammoun ( 2020), studied the use of nopal mucilage fibers to develop structural elements, observing that fibers increased the concrete tenacity and delivering higher velocity impact resistance.

Based on the above, the purpose of this work is to study the use of natural palm and mango fibers as reinforcement in concrete, with different percentages and dimensions on the compressive and flexural strength properties of concrete.

Methodology

Concrete material samples preparation to be tested included fine sand and coarse gravel, cement, tap water, and natural fibers. Portland compound cement CPC 30 R, according to ASTM C-150 (2020) standard, was used. Crushed stone sand from river Mezcala in the south of the country, with an aggregate particle size average of 4.75 mm and a maximum size of 19mm, were obtained. Aggregate physical properties are presented in Table 1.

PropertyCoarse aggregate (gravel)Fine aggregate (sand)Cement
Density (g/cm3
)
2.702.473.01
Water Absorption (%)0.392.13-
Compacted volumetric weight (kg/m3
)
1573.991649.36-
Loose volumetric weight (kg/m3
)
1477.091546.06-
Fineness Modulus-2.33-
Nominal maximum aggregate (mm)19.004.75-

Table 1 Physical properties of aggregates and cement.

2 3

Flowchart, recycling natural fiber procedure.

The provisions of different types of natural fibers were through the recollection of organic wastes, for the case of mango fruits, the pulp, peel and seed were removed, and the stone material (endocarp) was obtained as the final step of the procedure. Previously cleaning and dehydration procedures to the natural materials were performed, as observed in Figures 2 (a) and (b).

(a) Cleaning of mango stone and (b) Dehydration of palm leaves.

Long natural fibers were cut manually with dimensions of 30 mm long, and 3-4 mm wide as observed, while short fibers were 10 mm long, as observed in Figures 3 a) and b). The proposal of these lengths seeks to obtain a relationship between the dimension of the fiber and the mechanical properties of the cement paste.

2

(a) Palm long fibers (b) Mango short fibers.

Characterization Physical Mechanics of Fibers

The water content of plant fibers depends on temperature, physical properties, and especially relative humidity (Bouasker et al., 2014). The moisture content of the fibers was determined at room temperature by the weight difference method (Sumesh et al., 2022; Saha et al., 2021). The dry weight of a sample of 30 bundles of mango and palm fibers was determined at room temperature, on a Denver Instrument electronic scale with an accuracy of 0.0001 gr. The fiber drying process was carried out at 70 °C in an oven for one hour, and finally it was weighed again to determine its dry weight. The percentage of moisture content was calculated from the following expression (Tamanna et al., 2021), where: %H is the percentage of moisture, wh is the ambient dry weight and wo is the dry weight at 70 ℃.

\[\%H = \left(\frac{wh - wo}{wh}\right) * 100\tag{1}\]

Water absorption is the main factor affecting the mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced concrete (Shah et al., 2022). Three measurements were performed, where each sample contained 30 pieces of mango and palm fibers, which were saturated in distilled water for 24 hours, then dried on an absorbent cloth removing excess water from the material until a superficial drying is obtained. Finally, the superficially dry sample was weighed and dried at 70 °C for one hour, and the sample was weighed again. The percent absorption content was determined from Eq. (2), where W is water absorption percentage, m0, and m1 are the weight of the specimen before and after immersion, respectively (Sekar et al., 2022).

\[(W) = \left(\frac{m1 - m0}{m0}\right) * 100 \tag{2}\]

To determine the density, the volume displacement method or Archimedes' principle was used, 30 bundles of fibers saturated in distilled water were taken for 24 hours, and weighed on the electronic scale, and the samples were placed in 50 ml test tubes, adding distilled water to a 30 ml afore. The fibers were completely immersed in distilled water and the volume displacement was obtained according to:

\[\rho = \left(\frac{m}{\nu}\right) \tag{3}\]

The ratio of mass (m) to volume (v) determines the density of the fiber (Saha et al., 2021). Mechanical tensile testing of mango and palm fibers was performed according to the parameters of ASTM D638 (2022), and type IV specimen was used as shown in Figure 4 (a). For the strength test, an MTS model 3156 universal press was used, with a maximum load of 2000 kN (Figure 4 (b)).

(a) Specimen dimensions; (b) tensile test of natural fibers.

Physical and Mechanical Tests on Natural Fibers

Table 2 shows a comparison of the physical properties of the best known natural fibers used in the manufacture of reinforced concrete. Palm and mango fibers are in the same range of ambient moisture content with the values of 4.12 % and 4.00 %. High moisture content is detrimental to the performance of the material because it causes an internal accumulation of water, which is responsible for weakening the composite (de Azevedo et al., 2020).

Palm fibers have the highest absorption percentage compared to mango fibers with a value of 56.91%. The high water absorption is related to the porosity of the fiber, that is, natural fibers are hollow in nature and therefore diffuse more in water in the composites (Yorseng et al., 2020), which may result in a loss of adhesion between the fibers and the cementitious matrix. It can be observed that the studied mango and palm fibers present low density values in comparison with the known fibers. These values represent a decrease in the weight of the composite compared to the matrix, which gives an added value to the composite with a slightly lower weight (Hidalgo et al., 2012).

Table 2Comparison of the physical characteristics of natural mango and palm fibers with other fibers in the
literature.
Fiber typeMoisture content
(%)
Density (g/cm3
)
Absorption
(%)
Reference
Coir1.1-1.693.8(Chauhan et al., 2022;
Galicia-Aldama et al., 2019)
Heneque1.4(Castillo-Lara et al., 2020)
Jute12-13.71.3-1.562.0(Yun et al., 2022; Hussain
and Ali, 2019)
Flax7-121.4-1.5(Korniejenko et al., 2020)
Hemp3.5-8.01.4107.6(Ziane et al., 2020)
Banana1.37170(Saad et al., 2022)
Fan palm0.5-0.8100-200(Machaka et al., 2014)
Sisal111.2-1.5110-239(Balreddy et al., 2023)
Palm leaf1.1570(Poletto et al., 2014)
Palm sabal leaf4.121.2156.91This study
Mexicana
Mango4.01.0939.34This study

Figure 5 shows the stress-strain curves for natural fibers subjected to direct tension, and the specific values of the mechanical properties are shown in Table 3. The maximum breaking strength of mango fibers with an average value of 18.98 MPa, and palm fibers with a value of 17.53 MPa. These results are lower than those reported by some researchers on the literature of some natural fibers in the range of 70-300 MPa (Machaka et al., 2014; Marvila et al., 2021; Silva et al., 2020), but these results are also similar to those reported by other researchers (Armas-Ruiz et al., 2016; Ramakrishna

et al., 2005). As demonstrated, the mechanical properties of natural fibers can vary depending on the fiber composition dimensions, thickness, area, etc. (Arséne et al., 2003).

3

Figure 5 Stress-strain curves of natural fibers from mango bone and palm leaf.

Table 3 Mechanical properties of natural fibers.

PropertiesUnits (%))MangoPalm
Tensile strengthMPa18.9817.53
Modulus of elasticityMPa385457
ToughnessN.mm0.730.67

Mixture Concrete

For the elaboration of concrete a theoretical 300 kg/cm2 control sample mixture was considered according to ACI 211 method (2009), adding up 0.2% or 0.4% mango and palm fibers with respect to the fine aggregate weight, to find an optimal percentage less than 1%, according to studies by Ede and Agbede (2015), low volumes are added (frequently less than 1%). The water/cement ratio of 0.54, as observed in Table 4. Paste additives were not used, and there was no further treatment to natural fibers, and water quantity, cement, and gravel were not changed.

Table 4 Concrete mix design for 1 m<sup>3</sup>.

Cement
(kg/m³)
Coarse aggregate (kg/m³)Fine aggregate (kg/m³)Water (kg/m³)Water/cement
A/C
Fiber (%)Fiber
(kg/m³)
366.071047.65650.63197.650.540
366.071047.65650.63197.650.540.21.30
366.071047.65650.63197.650.540.42.60

The fiber paste was prepared as follows: first, coarse aggregate was mixed, then water and the fine aggregate was added, and cement was added. All these materials were mixed about 4 minutes in time until a homogeneous paste was obtained. Afterward, the paste stood still for 2 minutes, and with a rod, we proceeded to detach part of the concrete in the small areas of the container, and finally, the natural fibers were incorporated, distributed evenly all around the paste at random. Afterward, it was poured in big molds to perform physical tests according to ASTM C- 143 (2020), and C-231 (2022) standards, on the fresh concrete for obtaining slump, air concrete mixture content. The porosity of the concrete is obtained from the data of the air content test, and is calculated according to the following equation.

\[P = \frac{\left(\frac{a}{c}\right) - 0.36h + \left(\frac{A}{c}\right)}{0.317 + \left(\frac{1}{n_f}\right)\left(\frac{Af}{c}\right) + \left(\frac{1}{n_f}\right)\left(\frac{Ag}{c}\right) + \left(\frac{A}{c}\right)} \tag{4}\] where (A) is the air content, and the value of 0.7 was taken for the hydration of the cement (h), with the materials physical properties as fine (Af), coarse aggregates (Ag), cement (c), water /cement ratio (a/c), sand specific weight (pf) and gravel (pg).

Likewise, the constants 0.36 and 0.317 correspond to the percentages present in the cement of C4AF (tetracalcium aluminate ferrite) and C3A (tricalcium aluminate) (Mei et al., 2021). These were performed to provide a better quality control in the consistency of cement paste. Nomenclature for compressive and flexural strength are shown in Table 5.

Sample controlFiber typePorcentage (%)DimensionNomenclature
Concrete (C)0C-00
Mango (M)0.2Long (L)LM-02
Mango (M)0.4Long (L)LM-04
Mango (M)0.2Short (S)SM-02
Mango (M)0.4Short (S)SM-04
Palm (P)0.2Long (L)LP-02
Palm (P)0.4Long (L)LP-04
Palm (P)0.2Short (S)SP-02
Palm (P)0.4Short (S)SP-04

Table 5 Nomenclature used for mechanical tests.

Preparation of Specimens

Mechanical compression test parameters are determined by uniaxial compression on cube or cylindrical sample specimens (Jurowski et al., 2018). Twelve cylinders were fabricated for each design with 150 mm diameter and 300 mm height standard dimensions referred to ASTM C-31 (2022), subsequently, the specimens were cured in water for 28 days. Compression tests were performed during the initial and final curing period of 7 and 28 days respectively as shown in Figure 6.

Compressive strength test.

For concrete mechanical flexural tests, 6 standard rectangular beams per sample were elaborated, using steel molds with dimensions: 500 mm long, 150 mm wide, and 150 mm high according to ASTM C-31 Standard [64]. These beams were made with the same concrete mixture, as the compressive strength samples. A 120-ton maximum loading universal press was used. The bending resistance was determined using the ASTM C78 (2022) standard procedure (loading at third points) as seen in Figure 7.

Flexural strength test.

Under loading at the third point, two possibilities exist, being the first, is fractures occurring within the mid third, where flexural strength is calculated (Meisuh et al., 2018).

\[fr = \left(\frac{pl}{bd^2}\right) \tag{5}\] where fr is the flexural strength, pl is the loading applied multiplying the distance between the supporting points; b is the sample average width, and finally d is the height of the specimen. Secondly, for fractures outside the clear mid third, it is no more than 5% of its length, and the resistance is calculated (Jamshaid et al., 2022).

\[fr = \left(\frac{3pa}{bd^2}\right) \tag{6}\] where a is the average distance between the fracture line and the closest support in the beam surface in millimeters.

Results

Concrete Workability

The concrete mixture was planned for a 12 ± 2 cm slump, for the purpose of better consistency in the concrete paste and easier specimen molds. Different mixture slumps with natural fibers can be observed, as seen in Figure 8. Short fibers with volume contents higher than 0.4% showed less workability and consistency, with values around 11-12 cm in the cement mix due to water absorption, weight, type, and uniform fiber distribution (Yun et al., 2022).

12

Concrete slump test results.

Air Content

In Figure 9 the fresh concrete air content results are presented, and this physical property is fundamental to evaluate air voids trapped in the paste and, thus concrete durability. That is, when the void content in the paste is higher, the permeability increases, affecting the final performance in the product mechanical properties (Nicolás et al., 2024). It can be observed that with less natural fibers added, the air content diminishes with respect to the control mixture, due to the contact area between the matrix and the reinforcement decreases as a function of percent fibers (de Azevedo et al., 2021). Also, the reinforcement modifies internally the structure and less quantity fibers distribute better within the concrete paste, covering the pores left over by the coarse aggregate.

4

Percentage voids in concrete.

Porosity of the Concrete Paste

In Table 6 the calculated percent porosity results are presented. In general, it can be appreciated that the control sample shows a 19.68% with a 0.54 a/c relation analogous to other results reported (Flores-Nicolás et al., 2021), with a 22% and a 0.59 a/c relation. When the water-cement relation increases, the cement matrix structure will present high porosity and permeability. For the samples with low natural palm and mango fibers at reinforcement content of 0.2%, the content of voids and pores diminishes by approximately by 1% with respect to the control sample. This is maybe due to the fact that LM02, SM02, LP02 and SP02 fibers present better distributions within the paste as indicated by the air content results obtained.

Samplea/cPorosity (%)
C-000.5419.68
LM-020.5418.89
LM-040.5419.17
SM-020.5418.89
SM-040.5419.17
LP-020.5418.89
LP-040.5419.17
SP-020.5418.89
SP-040.5419.17

Table 6 Porosities of the concrete paste.

Compressive Strength Test Results

A compressive strength test was performed at 7, 14 and 28 days after samples preparation, with cylinder samples, containing natural fiber reinforcement and compared with the cylinder concrete control sample. The control specimen

presented very few cracks before rupture, the cracks starting at the lower part, and continuing to grow at the cylinder border as shown in Figure 10 a). In general, the rupture in the control sample was generated in the cylinder extremes, with the main crack advancing and cutting in a vertical or diagonal way.

For the mango fiber specimen, the formation of several cracks in different sizes distributed along the whole cylinder before rupture can be observed, including a columnar type of failure as seen in Figure 10 b). For the palm fibers reinforcement cylinders various small size cracks diagonally crossed along, with a failure in the middle part of the cylinder, as observed in Figure 10 c). Both samples showed greater ductility over the course of the experiment. The cracking tendencies observed in the fiber reinforced cylinders were observed for the seven and twenty-eight day elapsed tests, indicating well distributed fibers, retarding the specimens` failure.

(b)

(c)

Figure 10 Compressive strength at 28 days, samples a) C-00 b) SM-04 c) SP-02.

Compressive results are presented in Table 7, where the cylinders' average F'c, as well as the standard deviation and the variability coefficient, are also included. The control sample C-00 in the experimental test showed a final resistance at 28 days of 330.7 kg/cm² which represents 100%, exceeding the proposed theoretical design of 300 kg/cm². Samples of SM-04 and SP-02 increase their compressive strength with values of 372.3 and 373.6 kg/cm² compared to the control sample, this increase indicates 112.5% and 112.9% as observed in Figure 11. This behavior shows better adherence, less volume of voids, and improved distribution between the cement matrix and reinforcement with low natural fibers quantities.

Sample LP-02 presents the lowest F´c at 28 days of curing, with 274.9 kg/cm², that is, it obtained a decrease of 16.9% in its mechanical properties compared to the control sample. The porosity values in this design present low permeability, but including the compression results this may indicate fibers are subject to a degradation process from concrete for the high alkalinity and greater area of long fibers.

Table 7 Average values of compressive strength after 28 days.

SampleCompressive strength (F'c)
Mean (kg/cm2)St. dev. (kg/cm²)CofV (%)
C-00330.74.311.3
LM-02329.23.821.1
LM-04331.12.090.6
SM-02324.93.121.0
SM-04372.35.041.4
LP-02274.94.421.6
LP-04300.13.741.2
SP-02373.61.590.4
SP-04318.55.031.6
2

Compressive strength graph of concrete, cured at 28 days.

Flexural strength test results

Flexural strength average values for concrete (F'f) were obtained and are presented in Table 8. It can be observed for samples LM-02, LM-04, and LP-04 that F'f increased by 4% to 5%, as seen in Figure 12. This fact indicates that the length of fibers helps to retard and control beam cracks, having a greater area with short fibers. These results are comparable to studies using kenaf fibers (Elsaid et al., 2011). Furthermore, the addition of short fibers to SP-02 and SP-04 to the samples, diminished considerably the F'f values by 15% to 18%, may be due to different factors, such as fiber dimension, area, adherence in the fiber and matrix interface, etc.

Correlations between the mechanical properties F'f and F'c are in a range 11% to 16% of compression resistance, and the results are comparable with parameters studied in the literature (Moreno et al., 2016).

Table 8 Average values of flexural strengths for 28 days of curing time.

SampleFlexural Strength (F´f)
Tensile strengthMean (kg/cm2
)
F´f/F´c (%)
C-0045.3314
LM-0247.5114
LM-0446.8814
SM-0240.0812
SM-0442.9012
LP-0244.0716
LP-0447.7316
SP-0237.3611
SP-0438.5912
2

Percentage flexural strength.

Microstrusture

After cylinder compression and flexural strength tests reached rupture and failure, the microscopic images of the fractured specimens are presented in Figure 13. Material palm fibers, either short and long, present a good and random distribution as well as a considerable degradation in size, and a change in color due to the effect of concrete paste alkalinity. Most of the fibers are broken after mechanical tests, and fibers are not anchored in the cement paste meaning the interaction and adherence in the fiber/cement matrix is weak, as seen in Figures 13 (a) and (b). For mango fibers shown in Figure 13 (c) and (d) it is noticed that cement paste penetrates in the fiber pores besides being anchored in the cement matrix, existing a strong union and adherence from the reinforcing material, and providing evidence suggesting the increase in the material´s mechanical properties.

6

Microscopic images of concrete a) SP-04 b) LP-02, c) SM-02 d) LM-04.

Figure 14 shows the natural mango and palm fibers after one year in the cement paste reinforcement. The mango fiber, as shown in Figure 14 (a), shows deterioration in the upper part caused by the fracture of the specimen, however, there is a slight degradation in its dimensions. In contrast, palm fiber suffers greater deterioration in its physical structure.

The yellow line as seen in Figure 14 (b) indicates the original dimension of the fiber, consequently, its dimensions were reduced by approximately 40% after one year.

Microscopic images of the fibers a) mango and b) palm.

Discussion

Physical and mechanical properties of concrete

The use of natural fibers added to concrete has been used in developing countries, Figure 8 shows the effect of natural palm and mango fibers as reinforcement in concrete, which modifies its physical properties such as slump, air content and porosity. It was shown that the workability of the concrete paste decreased by adding different volumes and dimensions of fiber compared to the control sample. This event is due to the absorption of water by natural fibers of any type, these effects are comparable with other authors (Jamshaid et al., 2022; Krishna et al., 2018; Shah et al., 2022).

Figure 9 shows the different values of air content in fresh concrete with and without natural fibers. It is observed that by adding a lower percentage of fiber at 0.2% the amount of voids decreases, meaning that there are fewer bubbles within the interfacial zone of the aggregate and the paste. This event indicates that the fibers have a better distribution in the cementing structure.

Porosity is an important parameter because it is directly proportional to the mechanical strength of concrete (de Souza Rodrigues et al., 2006). In Table 6 it can be observed that the lower content of natural palm and mango fibers decreases the porosity of the concrete paste, consequently, the material is less permeable compared to the samples with higher fiber content. These results are consistent with previous research by Achour et al. (2017).

The compressive failure of the cylinders occurred at 28 days of curing and can be observed in Figure 10, the cracks occurred due to the axial load of the experiment. Cracks typically form in the interfacial transition zone, generally the weakest part of most hardened concrete, and influence the mechanical properties of the concrete (Afroughsabet et al., 2016). The increased crack formation can be noticed in the cylinders with natural fibers compared to the control sample because the fiber enhanced the bond strength, adding more cement products to the fiber surface (Wei et al., 2016), meaning that more energy is needed to break the samples.

The compressive strength (F´c) is shown in Figure 11, the samples with short mango fibers in an amount of 0.4% and short palm fibers in a smaller amount of 0.2% improved the mechanical properties of the concrete by an increase of 12% greater than the control sample. The reduced area of short fibres and the lower number of pores in this sample result in better distribution and strong cohesion of the structure and reinforcement. These results are comparable to other authors who have reported a decrease in F´c when fiber volume increases (Trabelsi and Kammoun et al., 2020; Elsaid et al., 2011; Flores Nicolás et al., 2024).

The flexural strength is observed in Figure 12, it can be noted that the long fibers have a better behavior in the samples with handle in different percentages, and palm fibers in a percentage of 0.4%. This behavior indicates that the long fiber dimension supports a greater load than the concrete supported until cracking due to the interfacial bond between the fibers and the matrix (Afroughsabet et al., 2016). It has been shown that the short fiber dimension helps to better propagate the cracks of the compressive forces and the long fiber dimension, on the contrary, the flexural forces, this finding indicates a direct relationship of the fiber dimension with the mechanical properties of the concrete.

Microstructure

Figure 13 shows the interfacial transition zone of the concrete paste, aggregate and natural fibers. The Zone (ITZ) is commonly considered to be the weakest element of concrete. An improvement of the ITZ properties is positively influenced by the added material. In this phase, the first cracks in the material begin and the process of destruction of the composite material begins (Golewski, 2018). The properties of ITZ are affected by the characteristics of the aggregate and the cementitious matrix. A good distribution of all the fiber-reinforced samples can be observed over the surface of the concrete matrix. However, a weak adhesion of the palm fibers and their degradation are shown, as a result of the high water absorption, as observed in Figure 13 b).

Figure 14 a) shows the microscopic images of the ITZ zone, where it can be seen that the surface of the fiber shows degradation due to the paste medium. The alkaline medium mainly degrades the lignin present in plant fibers, making it soluble, causing the separation of the cellulose fibrils (defibrillation) that until then were linked by the lignin (Camargo et al., 2020). This event also reduces the resistance of the palm fiber, causing poor adhesion and internal cracks in the concrete, weakening the material, as can be seen in Figure 14 b).

This is why, for possible future research, the authors recommend suggesting some chemical treatment to protect the durability of natural fibers in alkaline environments. It is important to apply other geometries of natural fibers other than those analyzed in this research, i.e. square fibers, or fibers with shorter dimensions for use in reinforced concrete.

Conclusions

The conclusions from this work can be drawn as follows.

The physical and mechanical characteristics of natural fibers depend on the type of fibers, shape, and dimensions, and there is also a variety in the results, but it is excellent information for the study of new natural elements incorporated as reinforcement in concrete. The workability of concrete decreases with the addition of natural fibers depending on the absorption, shape and length of the fibers. Also, concrete porosity diminishes with material reinforcement in low quantities, indicating a better distribution within the paste filling up voids left over by the coarse aggregates.

The use of palm or mango natural fibers as cement reinforcements is possible in the construction industry, at low contents. For short mango fibers an optimal content of 0.4% increases the compression resistance by 12%, retarding and controlling cracks produced by mechanical stress. Although flexural strength diminished slightly, mango long fibers did not modify the mechanical compression resistance, but an increase in the concrete F'f compared favorably with the control sample. Palm fibers did not show balance in the mechanical properties, but it is recommended a 0.2% content with respect to the sand weight due to the 12% increase in the compression mechanical properties.

Fibers must be protected using some surface chemical treatment avoiding properties losses and maintaining fibers' durability being in contact with the concrete's alkaline medium, without affecting its use and commercial application. At the microstructure fiber/cement interface, mango fibers present better adherence with good distribution over the cement paste, provoking a better response on the mechanical properties, as observed.

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful for the support of the Secretaria de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (Secihti) for this research.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted without any financial or commercial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Research Intelligence

Data from OpenAlex ↗

Metrics

7
Citations
3.32
FWCIfield-weighted
92th
Percentilevs same year + field
Article
Work type
Open Access

Citation Trend

Citation Timeline

YearCitations
20264
20253

Semantic Profile AI-classified research signals

Palm 0.77
level 2
level 2
level 1

Institution Network

References

  1. Achour, A., Ghomari, F., & Belayachi, N. (2017). Properties of cementitious mortars reinforced with natural fibers. Journal of adhesion science and Technology, 31(17), 1938–1962. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2017.1290572 DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2017.1290572
  2. Afroughsabet, V., Biolzi, L., & Ozbakkaloglu, T. (2016). High-performance fiber-reinforced concrete: a review. Journal of materials science, 51, 6517–6551. doi: 10.1007/s10853-016-9917-4 DOI: 10.1007/s10853-016-9917-4
  3. Ahamed, M. S., Ravichandran, P., & Krishnaraja, A. R. (2021, February). Natural fibers in concrete–A review. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1055(1), 012038. IOP Publishing. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1055/1/012038 DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/1055/1/012038
  4. Ahmad, J., Arbili, M. M., Majdi, A., Althoey, F., Farouk Deifalla, A., & Rahmawati, C. (2022). Performance of concrete reinforced with jute fibers (natural fibers): A review. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 17, 15589250221121871. doi: 10.1177/155892502211218 DOI: 10.1177/155892502211218
  5. Ahmad, J., Majdi, A., Al-Fakih, A., Deifalla, A. F., Althoey, F., El Ouni, M. H., & El-Shorbagy, M. A. (2022). Mechanical and durability performance of coconut fiber reinforced concrete: a state-of-the-art review. Materials, 15(10), 3601. doi:10.3390/ma15103601 DOI: 10.3390/ma15103601
  6. Ahmed, K. U., Geremew, A., & Jemal, A. (2022). The comparative study on the performance of bamboo fiber and sugarcane bagasse fiber as modifiers in asphalt concrete production. Heliyon, 8(7). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09842 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09842
  7. Akinyemi, B. A., & Dai, C. (2020). Development of banana fibers and wood bottom ash modified cement mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 241, 118041. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118041 DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118041
  8. Ali, B., Hawreen, A., Kahla, N. B., Amir, M. T., Azab, M., & Raza, A. (2022). A critical review on the utilization of coir (coconut fiber) in cementitious materials. Construction and Building Materials, 351, 128957. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128957 DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128957
  9. American Concrete Institute., ACI.211.1-91 (Reapproved 2009): Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete, 1–38.
  10. Armas-Ruiz, D., Ruiz-Galarza, S., Piován, M., Carrión-Matamoros, L., & Narváez-Muñoz, C. (2016). Caracterización de propiedades mecánicas de las fibras de banano de la corteza y el cuerpo del tallo. Científica, 20(1), 21–31.
  11. Arsène, M. A., Savastano Jr, H., Allameh, S. M., Ghavami, K., & Soboyejo, W. O. (2003, November). Cementitious composites reinforced with vegetable fibers. In Anais da 1st inter american conference on nonconventional materials and technologies in the ecoconstruction and infrastructure. João Pessoa-PB.
  12. Aslam, F., Zaid, O., Althoey, F., Alyami, S. H., Qaidi, S. M., de Prado Gil, J., & Martínez‐García, R. (2023). Evaluating the influence of fly ash and waste glass on the characteristics of coconut fibers reinforced concrete. Structural Concrete, 24(2), 2440-2459. doi:10.1002/suco.202200183 DOI: 10.1002/suco.202200183
  13. ASTM International (2020). “ASTM C143/C143M-20, Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete”. doi: 10.1520/C0143_C0143M-20 DOI: 10.1520/c0143_c0143m-20
  14. ASTM International (2022). “ASTM D638 -22, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics ”, doi: 10.1520/D0638-22. DOI: 10.1520/d0638-22
  15. ASTM International (2022). “ASTM C231/C231M-22, Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method”. doi: 10.1520/C0231_C0231M-22 DOI: 10.1520/c0231_c0231m-22
  16. ASTM International (2022). “ASTM C31/C31M-22, Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field”. doi:10.1520/C0031_C0031M-22 DOI: 10.1520/c0031_c0031m-22
  17. ASTM International (2022). “ASTM C78/C78M-22, Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading)”. doi: 10.1520/C0078_C0078M-22 DOI: 10.1520/c0078_c0078m-22
  18. ASTM, International (2020). ASTM C150/C150M-20: Standard specification for Portland cement. doi: 10.1520/C0150_C0150M-22 DOI: 10.1520/c0150_c0150m-22
  19. Asyraf, M. R. M., Khan, T., Syamsir, A., & Supian, A. B. M. (2022). Synthetic and natural fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites for advanced applications. Materials, 15(17), 6030. doi: 10.3390/ma15176030 DOI: 10.3390/ma15176030
  20. Balreddy, M. S., Nethra, P., & Naganna, S. R. (2023). Performance evaluation of open-graded bituminous concrete modified with natural fibers. Sustainability, 15(15), 11952. doi:10.3390/su151511952 DOI: 10.3390/su151511952
  21. Bouasker, M., Belayachi, N., Hoxha, D., & Al-Mukhtar, M. (2014). Physical characterization of natural straw fibers as aggregates for construction materials applications. Materials, 7(4), 3034-3048. doi:10.3390/ma7043034 DOI: 10.3390/ma7043034
  22. Camargo, M. M., Adefrs Taye, E., Roether, J. A., Tilahun Redda, D., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2020). A review on natural fiber-reinforced geopolymer and cement-based composites. Materials, 13(20), 4603. doi: 10.3390/ma13204603 DOI: 10.3390/ma13204603
  23. Castillo-Lara, J. F., Flores-Johnson, E. A., Valadez-Gonzalez, A., Herrera-Franco, P. J., Carrillo, J. G., Gonzalez-Chi, P. I., & Li, Q. M. (2020). Mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced foamed concrete. Materials, 13(14), 3060. doi:10.3390/ma13143060 DOI: 10.3390/ma13143060
  24. Chauhan, V., Kärki, T., & Varis, J. (2022). Review of natural fiber-reinforced engineering plastic composites, their applications in the transportation sector and processing techniques. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 35(8), 1169-1209.
  25. Colangelo, F., Cioffi, R., & Farina, I. (Eds.). (2021). Handbook of sustainable concrete and industrial waste management: recycled and artificial aggregate, innovative eco-friendly binders, and life cycle assessment. Woodhead Publishing.
  26. de Azevedo, A. R., Klyuev, S., Marvila, M. T., Vatin, N., Alfimova, N., de Lima, T. E., ... & Olisov, A. (2020). Investigation of the Potential Use of Curauá Fiber for Reinforcing Mortars. Fibers, 8(11). doi:10.3390/fib8110069 DOI: 10.3390/fib8110069
  27. de Azevedo, A. R., Marvila, M. T., Tayeh, B. A., Cecchin, D., Pereira, A. C., & Monteiro, S. N. (2021). Technological performance of açaí natural fibre reinforced cement-based mortars. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101675. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101675 DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101675
  28. de Souza Rodrigues, C., Ghavami, K., & Stroeven, P. (2006). Porosity and water permeability of rice husk ash-blended cement composites reinforced with bamboo pulp. Journal of materials science, 41(21), 6925-6937.
  29. Difonzo, G., de Gennaro, G., Pasqualone, A., & Caponio, F. (2022). Potential use of plant‐based by‐products and waste to improve the quality of gluten‐free foods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 102(6), 2199-2211. doi:10.1002/jsfa.11702 DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.11702
  30. Ede, A. N., & Agbede, J. O. (2015). Use of coconut husk fiber for improved compressive and flexural strength of concrete. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 6(1), 968-974.
  31. Elbehiry, A., Elnawawy, O., Kassem, M., Zaher, A., Uddin, N., & Mostafa, M. (2020). Performance of concrete beams reinforced using banana fiber bars. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 13, e00361. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00361 DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00361
  32. Elsaid, A., Dawood, M., Seracino, R., & Bobko, C. (2011). Mechanical properties of kenaf fiber reinforced concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 1991-2001. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.052 DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.052
  33. Escalante, M. A. M. (2018). Apropiación cultural: El caso de las artesanías tradicionales. In Anales del Museo Nacional de Antropología, 20, 158–166). Dirección General de Bellas Artes y de Conservación y Restauración de Bienes Culturales. ISSN: 2340-3519.
  34. FAOSTAT, F. (2021). Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Statistical database. Available online: www.fao.org/faostat
  35. Flores Nicolás, A., Menchaca Campos, E. C., Flores Nicolás, M., Martínez González, J. J., González Noriega, O. A., & Uruchurtu Chavarín, J. (2024). Influence of Recycled High-Density Polyethylene Fibers on the Mechanical and Electrochemical Properties of Reinforced Concrete. Fibers, 12(3), 24. doi: 10.3390/fib12030024 DOI: 10.3390/fib12030024
  36. Flores-Nicolás, A., Flores-Nicolás, M., & Uruchurtu-Chavarín, J. (2021). Corrosion effect on reinforced concrete with the addition of graphite powder and its evaluation on physical-electrochemical properties. Revista ALCONPAT, 11(1), 18–33. doi:10.21041/ra.v11i1.501 DOI: 10.21041/ra.v11i1.501
  37. Galicia-Aldama, E., Mayorga, M., Arteaga-Arcos, J. C., & Romero-Salazar, L. (2019). Rheological behaviour of cement paste added with natural fibres. Construction and Building Materials, 198, 148–157. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.179. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.179
  38. García, S. L. Q., & Salcedo, L. O. G. (2006). Uso de fibra de estopa de coco para mejorar las propiedades mecánicas del concreto. Ingeniería y Desarrollo, (20), 134-150.
  39. García-Mahecha, M., Soto-Valdez, H., Carvajal-Millan, E., Madera-Santana, T. J., Lomelí-Ramírez, M. G., & Colín-Chávez, C. (2023). Bioactive compounds in extracts from the agro-industrial waste of mango. Molecules, 28(1), 458. doi: 10.3390/molecules28010458 DOI: 10.3390/molecules28010458
  40. Golewski, G. L. (2018). Evaluation of morphology and size of cracks of the Interfacial Transition Zone (ITZ) in concrete containing fly ash (FA). Journal of hazardous materials, 357, 298–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.016
  41. Hasan, M., Saidi, T., Jamil, M., Amalia, Z., & Mubarak, A. (2022). Mechanical properties and absorption of high-strength fiber-reinforced concrete (HSFRC) with sustainable natural fibers. Buildings, 12(12), 2262. doi:10.3390/buildings12122262. DOI: 10.3390/buildings12122262
  42. Herrera Quispe, C. A., & Quispe De La Cruz, R. M. (2019). Análisis del comportamiento del concreto hidráulico reforzado con fibras naturales de agave para el diseño de pavimento rígido con el método mecanístico-empírico en la av. universitaria de la provincia de huancavelica-2018.
  43. Hidalgo, M., Muñoz, M., & Quintana, K. (2012). Análisis mecánico del compuesto polietileno aluminio reforzado con fibras cortas de fique en disposición bidimensional. Revista Latinoamericana de Metalurgia y Materiales, 32(1), 89–95. ISSN 0255-6952.
  44. Hussain, T., & Ali, M. (2019). Improving the impact resistance and dynamic properties of jute fiber reinforced concrete for rebars design by considering tension zone of FRC. Construction and Building Materials, 213, 592–607. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.036 DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.036
  45. Jamshaid, H., Mishra, R. K., Raza, A., Hussain, U., Rahman, M. L., Nazari, S., ... & Choteborsky, R. (2022). Natural cellulosic fiber reinforced concrete: influence of fiber type and loading percentage on mechanical and water absorption performance. Materials, 15(3), 874. doi:10.3390/ma15030874 DOI: 10.3390/ma15030874
  46. Jimenez Iriarte, M. A., & Torres Pertuz, F. A. (2020). Análisis sistemático de literatura–Analisis de un concreto convencional con un concreto con material alternativo (Bagazo de caña de azucar).
  47. Juárez Alvarado, C. A., Rodríguez López, P., Rivera Villarreal, R., & Rechy de Von Roth, M. D. L. Á. (2003). Uso de las fibras naturales de lechuguilla como refuerzo en el concreto. Ciencia Uanl, 6(4).
  48. Jurowski, K., & Grzeszczyk, S. (2018). Influence of selected factors on the relationship between the dynamic elastic modulus and compressive strength of concrete. Materials, 11(4), 477. doi:10.3390/ma11040477 DOI: 10.3390/ma11040477
  49. Korniejenko, K., Łach, M., Hebdowska-Krupa, M., & Mikuła, J. (2020). Impact of flax fiber reinforcement on mechanical properties of solid and foamed geopolymer concrete. Advances in Technology Innovation, 6(1), 11. doi:10.46604/aiti.2021.5294 DOI: 10.46604/aiti.2021.5294
  50. Krishna, N. K., Prasanth, M., Gowtham, R., Karthic, S., & Mini, K. M. (2018). Enhancement of properties of concrete using natural fibers. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(11), 23816-23823. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.173 DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.173
  51. Luhar, S., Suntharalingam, T., Navaratnam, S., Luhar, I., Thamboo, J., Poologanathan, K., & Gatheeshgar, P. (2020). Sustainable and renewable bio-based natural fibres and its application for 3D printed concrete: A review. Sustainability, 12(24), 10485. doi:10.3390/su122410485 DOI: 10.3390/su122410485
  52. Lumingkewas, R. H., Husen, A., & Andrianus, R. (2017). Effect of fibers length and fibers content on the splitting tensile strength of coconut fibers reinforced concrete composites. Key Engineering Materials, 748, 311-315. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.748.311. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.748.311
  53. Machaka, M., Basha, H., Abou Chakra, H., & Elkordi, A. (2014). Alkali treatment of fan palm natural fibers for use in fiber reinforced concrete. European scientific journal, 10(12).
  54. Mansour, R., El Abidine, R. Z., & Brahim, B. (2017). Performance of polymer concrete incorporating waste marble and alfa fibers. Advances in concrete construction, 5(4), 331. doi:10.12989/acc.2017.5.4.331. DOI: 10.12989/acc.2017.5.4.331
  55. Marroquín Albadan, H. T., & López Castro, M. F. (2019). Análisis de la respuesta mecánica del concreto hidráulico para pavimentos modificados con fibras de bejuco (Doctoral dissertation).
  56. Martinez, S., Teresa, M., Sánchez Herrera, L. M., Torres García, G., & GARCIA PAREDES, J. D. (2012). Red de valor del mango y sus desechos con base en las propiedades nutricionales y funcionales.
  57. Marvila, M. T., Rocha, H. A., de Azevedo, A. R. G., Colorado, H. A., Zapata, J. F., & Vieira, C. M. F. (2021). Use of natural vegetable fibers in cementitious composites: Concepts and applications. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 6, 1–24. doi: 10.1007/s41062-021-00551-8 DOI: 10.1007/s41062-021-00551-8
  58. Mei, K., Cheng, X., Gu, T., Zheng, Y., Gong, P., Li, B., ... & Dai, B. (2021). Effects of Fe and Al ions during hydrogen sulphide (H2S)-induced corrosion of tetracalcium aluminoferrite (C4AF) and tricalcium aluminate (C3A). Journal of hazardous materials, 403, 123928. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123928 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123928
  59. Meisuh, B. K., Kankam, C. K., & Buabin, T. K. (2018). Effect of quarry rock dust on the flexural strength of concrete. Case studies in construction materials, 8, 16-22.
  60. Mejías-Brizuela, N., Orozco-Guillén, E., & Galáan-Hernández, N. (2016). Aprovechamiento de los residuos agroindustriales y su contribución al desarrollo sostenible de México. Revista de Ciencias Ambientales y Recursos Naturales, 2(6), 27–41.
  61. Moreno, E. I., Solís-Carcaño, R. G., Varela-Rivera, J., & Gómez López, M. A. (2016). Resistencia a tensión del concreto elaborado con agregado calizo de alta absorción. Concreto y cemento. Investigación y desarrollo, 8(1), 35-45.
  62. Nicolás, A. F., Campos, E. C. M., Nicolás, M. F., Noriega, O. A. G., Peréz, C. A. G., & Chavarín, J. U. (2024). Corrosion Resistance of Reinforcing Steel in Concrete Using Natural Fibers Treated with Used Engine Oil. Civil Engineering Journal, 10(4), 1012-1033. doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-04-02 DOI: 10.28991/cej-2024-010-04-02
  63. Pacheco-Jiménez, A. A., Heredia, J. B., Gutiérrez-Grijalva, E. P., Quintana-Obregón, E. A., & Muy-Rangel, M. D. (2022). Potencial industrial de la cáscara de mango (Mangifera indica L.) para la obtención de pectina en México. TIP. Revista especializada en ciencias químico-biológicas, 25. doi: 10.22201/fesz.23958723e.2022.419. DOI: 10.22201/fesz.23958723e.2022.419
  64. Perez, O. F. A., Florez, D. R., Vergara, L. M. Z., & Benavides, K. V. H. (2022). Innovative use of agro-waste cane bagasse ash and waste glass as cement replacement for green concrete. Cost analysis and carbon dioxide emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, 134822. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134822 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134822
  65. Poletto, M., Ornaghi Junior, H. L., & Zattera, A. J. (2014). Native cellulose: structure, characterization and thermal properties. Materials, 7(9), 6105-6119. doi:10.3390/ma7096105. DOI: 10.3390/ma7096105
  66. Ramakrishna, G., & Sundararajan, T. (2005). Studies on the durability of natural fibres and the effect of corroded fibres on the strength of mortar. Cement and Concrete Composites, 27(5), 575-582. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.09.008 DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.09.008
  67. Saad, M., Agwa, I. S., Abdelsalam Abdelsalam, B., & Amin, M. (2022). Improving the brittle behavior of high strength concrete using banana and palm leaf sheath fibers. Mechanics of advanced materials and structures, 29(4), 564-573. doi:10.1080/15376494.2020.1780352 DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2020.1780352
  68. Saha, A., Kumar, S., & Zindani, D. (2021). Investigation of the effect of water absorption on thermomechanical and viscoelastic properties of flax‐hemp‐reinforced hybrid composite. Polymer Composites, 42(9), 4497-4516. doi:10.1002/pc.26164. DOI: 10.1002/pc.26164
  69. Sekar, S., Suresh Kumar, S., Vigneshwaran, S., & Velmurugan, G. (2022). Evaluation of mechanical and water absorption behavior of natural fiber-reinforced hybrid biocomposites. Journal of Natural Fibers, 19(5), 1772-1782. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1788487. DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1788487
  70. Shah, I., Jing, L., Fei, Z. M., Yuan, Y. S., Farooq, M. U., & Kanjana, N. (2022). A review on chemical modification by using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to investigate the mechanical properties of sisal, coir and hemp fiber reinforced concrete composites. Journal of Natural Fibers, 19(13), 5133-5151. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2021.1875359 DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2021.1875359
  71. Shah, I., Li, J., Yang, S., Zhang, Y., & Anwar, A. (2022). Experimental investigation on the mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced concrete. Journal of Renewable Materials, 10(5), 1307. doi: 10.32604/jrm.2022.017513 DOI: 10.32604/jrm.2022.017513
  72. SIAP, S. (2021). Servicio de información agroalimentaria y pesquera. Reporte especial naranja. Available in https://www.gob.mx/siap/acciones-y-programas/produccion-agricola-33119
  73. Silva, G., Kim, S., Bertolotti, B., Nakamatsu, J., & Aguilar, R. (2020). Optimization of a reinforced geopolymer composite using natural fibers and construction wastes. Construction and Building Materials, 258, 119697. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119697. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119697
  74. Sumesh, K. R., Kavimani, V., Rajeshkumar, G., Indran, S., & Khan, A. (2022). Mechanical, water absorption and wear characteristics of novel polymeric composites: impact of hybrid natural fibers and oil cake filler addition. Journal of Industrial Textiles, 51(4_suppl), 5910S-5937S. doi:10.1177/1528083720971344 DOI: 10.1177/1528083720971344
  75. Sustaita Rivera, F. (2009). Utilización de residuos de palma de sombrero (Brahea dulcis) como sustrato de cultivo. (Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. thesis, Colegio de Potsgraduados, México).
  76. Tamanna, T. A., Belal, S. A., Shibly, M. A. H., & Khan, A. N. (2021). Characterization of a new natural fiber extracted from Corypha taliera fruit. Scientific reports, 11(1), 7622. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87128-8 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87128-8
  77. Trabelsi, A., & Kammoun, Z. (2020). Mechanical properties and impact resistance of a high-strength lightweight concrete incorporating prickly pear fibres. Construction and Building Materials, 262, 119972. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119972. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119972
  78. Wei, J., Ma, S., & D
  79. Yorseng, K., Rangappa, S. M., Pulikkalparambil, H., Siengchin, S., & Parameswaranpillai, J. (2020). Accelerated weathering studies of kenaf/sisal fiber fabric reinforced fully biobased hybrid bioepoxy composites for semi-structural applications: Morphology, thermo-mechanical, water absorption behavior and surface hydrophobicity. Construction and Building Materials, 235, 117464. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117464 DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117464
  80. Yun, K. K., Hossain, M. S., Han, S., & Seunghak, C. (2022). Rheological, mechanical properties, and statistical significance analysis of shotcrete with various natural fibers and mixing ratios. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e00833. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00833 DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00833
  81. Ziane, S., Khelifa, M. R., & Mezhoud, S. (2020). A study of the durability of concrete reinforced with hemp fibers exposed to external Sulfatic attack. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports, 30(2). doi: 10.2478/ceer-2020-0025 DOI: 10.2478/ceer-2020-0025