1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol 25 (2018) Issue 3
  4. Articles

Properties Of Concrete Made Of Ternary Cementitious System

Abstract

AbstrakPondasi adalah bagian yang penting dari sistem rekayasa konstruksi yang bertumpu pada tanah. Perencanaan pondasi membutuhkan seorang ahli dalam perhitungannya. Banyak metode yang dapat digunakan dalam perencanaan pondasi khususnya daya dukung dan penurunan. Namun metode yang paling sesuai harus berdasarkan judgement dari seorang ahli. Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk membantu perhitungan daya dukung dan penurunan pondasi dengan strong foundation application (SFA). SFA merupakan suatu sistem pakar yang dibuat berdasarkan knowledge base dari berbagai sumber. Perhitungan yang dilakukan pada SFA telah dibandingkan dengan hasil uji pembebanan dari lima proyek di Indonesia, yaitu Apartement MO, PYRC Mall, CPRW, ARJE dan SPET. Dari kelima proyek didapat bahwa daya dukung yang dihitung menggunakan data laboratorium metode Tomlinson lebih mendekati nilai uji tiang daripada metode Gamma; data SPT metode Luciano memberikan nilai yang lebih mendekati hasil uji pembebanan; metode Mayerhoff memberikan nilai yang lebih optimis; perhitungan dengan data sondir metode Vesic dan Tomlinson memberikan nilai daya dukung ujung yang sama; namun daya dukung selimut Vesic lebih besar dari Tomlinson.AbstractFoundation is one important elements of construction engineering which rests on soil. Foundation design requires an expert on the calculation process. Many methods can be used to design foundation particularly to calculate bearing capacity and settlement. However, chosing the suitable method should be based on an expert judgement. The purpose of this paper is to provide help on bearing capacity and settlement calculation, with strong foundation application (SFA). SFA is an expert system based on knowledge obtained from many sources. The calculation by SFA has been carried out and compared with the loading test taken from the five project in Indonesia, namely MRO Apartement, PYRC mall, CPRW, ARJE, and SPET. From the 5 projects, it is known that the end bearing capacity, calculated by Tomlinson method, is closer to the test value compared to Gamma Method. For SPT data, Luciano method gives value closer to the loading test. Meyerhoff method give a more optimistic value and the calculation by using sondir data, based on Vesic and Tomlinson Method, gives the same end-bearing capacity, even tough the vesic method give higher side friction capacity compared to Tomlinson method.

Keywords

Abstrak

Pemanfaatan limbah industri yang memiliki sifat pozolan banyak digunakan dan dimanfaatkan untuk menggantikan sebagian semen dalam campuran beton. Fly ash dan microsilica merupakan bahan-bahan bersifat pozolan dapat dimanfaatkan dalam membentuk ternary cementitious system. Nilai slump, porositas dan kuat tekan beton menjadi parameter dalam studi ini dalam melihat karakteristik beton yang menggunakan ternary cementitious system berbahan semen, fly ash dan microsilica. Tiga jenis campuran, yaitu campuran normal yang hanya menggunakan semen OPC sebagai bahan pengikat, campuran menggunakan semen OPC-fly ash-microsilica tanpa superplasticiser, dan campuran menggunakan semen OPC-fly ash-microsilica dengan tambahan superplasticiser dibuat untuk dibandingkan karakteristik betonnya. Penggunaan fly ash dan microsilica memperbaiki nilai slump beton segar serta terbukti memperkecil nilai porositas dari beton sehingga kuat tekan beton yang dihasilkan meningkat sejalan dengan uumur beton. Penurunan porositas dan peningkatan kuat tekan beton cukup signifikan dengan penambahan fly ash dan microsilica.

Kata-kata Kunci: Fly ash, microsilica, ternary cementitious system

1. Introduction

Concrete is a material that has been extensively consumed in construction industry. In general, raw materials of concrete are widely available in the field except cement, thus concrete becomes a famous material to use in construction industry. On the other hand, the maintenance of construction manufactured concrete is relatively easy and simple. Those factors significantly contributes to reduce construction cost of concrete buildings in comparison with others materials.

Compressive strength of concrete is a predominantly mechanical parameter to measure the quality of concretes. Water to cement (w/c) ratio is the principal variable to develop the quality of concrete, as Abram's postulate that ''for a given cement, method of test and age, the compressive strength of a fully compacted concrete depends only on the free water/cement

ratio" (Neville and Brooks, 1990). Cement is a hydraulic binder material and one of the materials which has significant effect on developing the quality of concrete. However, it is a relatively expensivemanufactured material needed in concrete buildings. Since it is a predominant need and high consumed in concrete buildings, a lot of research on cement replacement with alternative pozolanic materials such as ash rice husk, fly ash (Chopra et al., 2015), microsilica (Nili and Ehsani, 2015), metakaolin (Bai et al., 2000), and ground granulated blast furnace-ggbs (Babu and Kumar, 2000) have been carried out. The use of more than one of pozolanic materials to produce ternary cementitious system will beneficially induce to the properties of concrete. Therefore, this study investigates on the effect of ternary cementitious system of cement, fly ash and microsilica on the concrete properties which are workability, porosity and strength.

2. Pozolanic Materials

2.1 Fly ash

Fly ash is one of the three waste material results in coal combustion furnace in which it has pozolanic behaviour. As a waste material of coal combustion furnace, the physical and chemical properties of fly ash will be different at every single coal combustion furnace. The chemical and physical properties of fly ash on different countries (French and Smitham, 2007), are shown in Table 1 and 2.

2.1 Microsilica

Microsilica or silica fume is a furnace waste material in the manufacturing of silicon and ferro silicon metal. It is a material in form of noncrystalline polymorph silicon dioxide (Razak and Wong, 2011). In general, microsilica is powder with average diameter of 150 nm and having physical and mechanical properties as shown in Table 2 and 3 respectively.

Table 1. Chemical properties of fly ash (French and Smitham, 2007)

AustraliaAustriaCanadaFranceEuropeJapanNeCountry
therlands
SpainUKUSA
Humidity<1.0<1.0---<1.0<1.0<1.5<0.5<3.0
Loss of
ignition
<4.0-6.0<5.0<12.0
(6.0)
<7.0<7.0<5.0<5.0<6.0<7.0<6.0
SiO2--->40->45----
SiO2 + Al2O3----------
SiO2 + Al2O3
+ Fe2O3
---------<70
(50)
MgO------<4.0---
CaO (total)------<5.0-<10-
CaO (free)-<5.0-<1.0(2.5)--
Na2O
terlarut
----------
Na2O + K2O---<6.0------
Na2O
equivalent
---------
Alkali
evailability
---------
SO3<3.0<3.5-<2.5<3.0-<2.5<4.5<2.0<5.0
Cl-<0.1-<0.1<0.1-<0.1-<0.1-
Glass------>70---

Table 2. Physical properties of cement, microsilica dan fly ash (Razak and Wong, 2011)

ItemOrdinary Portland CementMicrosilicaFly ash
(OPC)
Specific gravity3.112.522.22
Average particel size (μm)2239.509.4
Specific surface area (m2
/kg)
metode Blaine340--
metode serapan Nitrogen (BET)4200950021300
Standard consistency (%)27.4--
Setting time (min)---
awal110--
Akhir300--

100 Jurnal Teknik Sipil

Table 3. Chemicals property dari microsilica (Razak and Wong, 2011)

MicrosilicaComposition
SiO281.35
\(Al_2O_3\)4.48
\(Fe_2O_3\)1.42
CaO0.80
MgO1.47
\(SO_3\)1.34
Na2O-
K2O-

3. Experiment Overview

3.1 Materials

Materials used in this study were coarse aggregate with diameter ranging from 16 mm down to 5 mm, and fine aggregate ranging between 4.5 mm and 0.30 mm. Cement type I (OPC) with specific surface area of 338 m<sup>2</sup>/kg, Fly ash complied with BS EN450-1 kategori B (2005) and slurry microsilica complied with BS EN 12363-1(2005), and poly-carboxylate polymer based superplasticiser were used to produce specimens.

Three different concrete mixes were observed to investigate the effect of using fly ash and microsilica in concrete mix, particularly in terms of workability, porosity and compressive strength as shown in Table 4.

3.2 Compressive strength of hardened concrete

Compressive strength of hardened concrete was applied on six specimens of 100 x 100 x 100 mm cubes according to BS EN 12390-3: 2001 (2001), Figure 1.

Compressive strengths of hardened concrete specimens were computed based on equation (1) as follow:

\[f_c = \frac{P_{\text{max}}}{A} \tag{1}\]

Where \(f_c\) is compressive strength (MPa), \(P_{max}\) is maximum load (N), A is cross section area of specimen \((mm^2)\).

Table 4. Concrete mix propotions

ItemNormalMSFA*Sp-MSFA**
Cement1.001.001.00
Total water0.310.310.31
Coarse agregate2.662.662.66
Fine agregate1.141.141.14
Fly ash-0.150.15
Microsilica-0.110.11
Superplasticiser--0.002

3.3 Workability of fresh concrete

Consistency of fresh concrete was observed to evaluate the characteristics of fresh concrete when adding fly ash and microslilica. The consistency test method used for fresh concrete was slump test according to BS EN 12350-2 (2009).

3.4 Porosity of concrete

Total volume of pores in concrete is used to identify the level of concrete porosity (Neville, 1995). Cubes of 100 x 100x 100 mm were investigated to quantify the porosity of concrete. Equation (2) was applied to quantify porosity of concrete according to BS EN 772-4 (1998), as follow:

\[Porosity(\%) = \frac{W_2 - W_1}{W_2} \tag{2}\] where \(W_1\) is weight of oven dry specimen, and \(W_2\)is weight of saturated surface dry specimen. The method used to find out \(W_1\) and \(W_2\) is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 1. Compression test machine

1

Figure 2. Flowchart to measure the porosity of concrete

Figure 3. Dessicator Vaccum

4. Result and Discussion

Workability or consistency of fresh concrete is a parameter to quantify fresh concrete to be casted in the field. Measuring height drop or vertical settlement of fresh concrete (slump value) is a simple way to identify the workability and consistency of the fresh concrete. Slump value of fresh concrete is dependent on materials' constituents of concrete. W/c ratio is a significant parameter in producing high slump value - workable fresh concrete (Mehta, 1986). As the w/c ratio of mix design remains same, other constituents of materials will play an important role in increasing the slump value. The effect of using fly ash and microsilica in the concrete mix on slump value is shown in Figure 4. For a given normal concrete mix with w/c ratio of 0.31, the slump value of fresh concrete was 20 mm. However, normal concrete mix with additional fly ash and microsilica have a slump value of 35 mm. Adding fly ash and microsilica in the normal concrete mix was found to increase the slum value around 75 % compared to slump value of the normal concrete mix. It indicates that fly ash and microsilica give an a noticeable effect on the workability of fresh concrete. Physical characteristic of fly ash and microsilica, in which average particle size is smaller than OPC-Table 2, plays a significant effect on increasing the workability of fresh concrete. As the aim of superplasticiser is to gain an applicable and workable fresh concrete, a fully compacted concrete can be accurately achieved. Adding superplasticiser by 2% of the cement weight in the concrete mix prompts to have a proper slump value, i.e. 100 mm slump value, as shown in Figure 4.

The measurement of concrete porosity with the age of 14, 28, and 56 days was carried out as shown in Figure 5. For normal concrete (blue diamond) at the age of 14, 28 1nd 56 days, the concrete have porosity of more than 2%. Concrete mix added by fly ash and microsilica tends to have hardened concrete with less porosity than normal concrete. Increasing workability of fresh concrete by adding superplasticiser significantly reduce the porosity of hardened concrete. The porosity of concretes drops to less than 1%. Finesses of fly ash and microsilica particles and the use of superplasticiser in the mix play important roles to make a fully compacted fresh concrete. Moreover, segregation and bleeding of concrete did not happen. Thus, these are factors that encourage the making concrete with less porosity.

Concrete compressive strength is a parameter that is used to determine the quality of concrete. Compressive strength of concrete manufactured with 3 different concrete mix designs is shown in Figure 6. Concrete compressive strength with the age of 14, 28 and 56 days are compared. Hardened concretes added by fly ash and microslilica tend to have higher compressive strength than normal concrete. However, concrete strength with the age of 14 days is below the compressive strength of normal concrete. For hardened concrete manufactured with concrete mix added by fly ash, microsilica, and superplasticizer, the concrete strength is the highest of all ages. This study shows that adding pozolanic materials in normal concrete mix significantly increases compressive

strength of hardened concrete. Physical properties of pozolanic materials (fly ash and microsilica) give benefit in avoiding segregation and bleeding of fresh concrete during full compaction. Chemicals property of

3

Figure 4. Slump value of concrete

5

Figure 5. Porosity of concrete

7

Figure 6. Compressive strength of concrete

pozolanic materials helps to transform and redistribute pores in concrete by doing pozolanic reaction with free calcium hydroxide to form new calcium silicate (Aitcin, 1998) and improves paste strength. Thus, fly ash and microslica are important materials to form ternary cementitious system in order to achieve high strength concrete.

5. Conclusion

Some conclusion that can be drawn on this study are as follows:

  • 1. Fly ash and microsilica are influential materials in ternary cementitious system to reduce porosity of concrete.
  • 2. Superplasticiser was found to play significant effect on producing high strength concrete using ternary cementitious system consist of fly ash and microsilica.

Research Intelligence

Data from OpenAlex ↗

Metrics

0.00
FWCIfield-weighted
26th
Percentilevs same year + field
Article
Work type
Open Access

Semantic Profile AI-classified research signals

Institution Network

References

  1. Aitcin, P. C., 1998, High Performance Concrete, E&FN Spon, New York, USA,.
  2. Babu, K. G., and Kumar, V. S. R., 2000, Efficiency of GGBS in Concrete, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 30, No. 7, pp. 1031-1036. DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00271-4
  3. Bai, J., Sabir, B. B., Wild, S., and Kinuthia, J. M., 2000, Strength Development in Concrete Incorporating PFA and Metakaolin, Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 153-162. DOI: 10.1680/macr.2000.52.3.153
  4. BS EN 450-1, 2005, Fly Ash for Concrete: Finesses Category S, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  5. BS EN 772-4, 1998, Methods of Test for Masonry Units. Determination of Real and Bulk Density and of Total and Open Porosity for Natural Stone Masonry Units, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  6. BS EN 12350-2, 2009, Testing Fresh Concrete, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels. BS EN 12363-1, 2005, Silica Fume for Concrete, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  7. BS EN 12363-1, 2005, Silica Fume for Concrete, European Committee for Standardization,Brussels.
  8. BS EN 12390-3, 2001, Testing Hardened Concrete, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  9. Chopra, D., Siddique, R., and Kunal, 2015, Strength, Permeability and Microstructure of Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Rice Husk Ash, Biosystems Engineering, Vol. 130, pp. 72-80.
  10. French, D., and Smitham, J. , 2007, Fly Ash Characteristics and Feed Coal Properties. Research Report 73, QACT Technology Transfer Centre, Australia.
  11. Mehta, P. K., 1986, Concrete structure, properties and materials, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, USA. DOI: 10.1016/0262-5075(86)90055-2
  12. Neville, A. M. and Brooks, J. J., 1990, Concrete Technology, Addison Wesley Longman Limited, Updated Revision, UK.
  13. Neville, A. M., 1995, Properties of concrete, Longman Group Ltd, 4th edition, Essex, UK.
  14. Nili, M., and Ehsani, A., 2015, Investigating the Effect of the Cement Paste and Transition Zone on Strength Development of Concrete Containing Nano-Silica and Silica Fume, Materials & Design, Vol. 75, pp. 174-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.024
  15. Razak, H. A., and Wong, H. S., 2011, Physical Properties of Ordinary Portland Cement, Metakaolin and Silica Fume using Scanning Microscopies, International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1-7.