1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol 24 (2025) Issue 2
  4. Articles

The Public Innovator’s Playbook: Nurturing Bold Ideas in Government

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive academic review of The Public Innovator’s Playbook: Nurturing Bold Ideas in Government by William D. Eggers and Shalabh Kumar Singh, highlighting its relevance across strategic management, information technology, and socio-political disciplines. Positioned as a critical guide for transforming public sector institutions, the book outlines a structured innovation cycle—comprising idea generation, selection, implementation, and diffusion—intended to embed innovation as a core organizational function rather than an ad hoc response to crises. In terms of strategic management, the book contributes by offering clear frameworks and replicable models that align innovation with institutional missions and managerial planning. From a technological standpoint, it underscores the vital role of digital tools such as blogs, wikis, and peer-to-peer networks in facilitating interdepartmental communication, breaking bureaucratic silos, and accelerating strategy execution. Socially and politically, it promotes participatory governance through citizen engagement, open collaboration, and multi-stakeholder input, supported by examples like the World Bank’s Development Marketplace. Despite these strengths, the book is not without its limitations. It tends to present innovation in an overly idealistic manner, often underplaying structural, political, and contextual barriers to implementation. Furthermore, its reliance on Western-centric case studies may limit applicability in diverse governmental contexts. Nonetheless, the book’s strengths lie in its pragmatic approach, its encouragement of a culture of experimentation, and its integration of cross-sectoral perspectives. It serves as both an operational toolkit and a visionary call for transforming public institutions into adaptive, learning systems. This review concludes that The Public Innovator’s Playbook is a valuable resource for public administrators, scholars, and policymakers who seek to foster sustained innovation within government, and recommends readers approach it with a contextual and critical lens to maximize its strategic and democratic potential.

Keywords

Research Intelligence

Data from OpenAlex ↗

Metrics

41
Citations
13.54
FWCIfield-weighted
98th
Percentilevs same year + field
Article
Work type
Open Access

Citation Trend

Citation Timeline

YearCitations
20253
20244
20235
20224
20211
20203
20197
20182
20172
20163
20154
20131

Semantic Profile AI-classified research signals

Institution Network

References

  1. Berry, F. (1994). Innovation in Public Management: The Adoption of Strategic Planning. Public Administration Review, 54, 322. https://doi.org/10.2307/977379 DOI: 10.2307/977379
  2. Bertot, J., Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2016). Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework. Gov. Inf. Q., 33, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.004 DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.004
  3. Butt, A., Imran, F., Helo, P., & Kantola, J. (2024). Strategic design of culture for digital transformation. Long Range Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2024.102415 DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2024.102415
  4. Eggers, W. D., & Singh, S. K. (2009). The Public Innovator ’ s Playbook: Nurturing bold ideas in government.
  5. Fung, A. (2015). Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future. Public Administration Review, 75, 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/PUAR.12361 DOI: 10.1111/puar.12361
  6. Lopes, A., & Farias, J. S. (2020). How can governance support collaborative innovation in the public sector? A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88, 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319893444 DOI: 10.1177/0020852319893444
  7. Mariani, I., & Bianchi, I. (2023). Conceptualising Digital Transformation in Cities: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for the Analysis of Public Sector Innovation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118741 DOI: 10.3390/su15118741
  8. McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences, 51, 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11077-018-9315-7 DOI: 10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7
  9. Riduan, A. (2024). Citizen Participation in Policy Decision-Making. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Sciences and Technologies. https://doi.org/10.62207/fz1xn342 DOI: 10.62207/fz1xn342
  10. Smith, R., Schäfer, S., & Bernstein, M. (2023). Governing beyond the project: Refocusing innovation governance in emerging science and technology funding. Social Studies of Science, 54, 377–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127231205043 DOI: 10.1177/03063127231205043
  11. Suri, N., Benincasa, G., Tortonesi, M., Stefanelli, C., Kovach, J., Winkler, R., Kohler, R., Hanna, J., Pochet, L., & Watson, S. (2010). Peer-to-peer communications for tactical environments: Observations, requirements, and experiences. IEEE Communications Magazine, 48. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2010.5594678 DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2010.5594678
  12. Viana, L. B. F. (2025). Redefining Collaborative Governance in the Digital Age: insights from an integrative systematic review on the role of ICT in collaboration. Technium Social Sciences Journal. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v67i1.12358 DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v67i1.12358
  13. Vigar, G., Cowie, P., & Healey, P. (2020). Innovation in planning: creating and securing public value. European Planning Studies, 28, 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639400 DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1639400
  14. Wicaksono, S. R. (2024). Transformasi Digital: Strategi dan Aplikasi. Seribu Bintang. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13293361 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13293361
  15. Wicaksono, S. R., & Suprapto, E. (2025). Collaborative Project Based Learning using Office 365 during Covid-19 Outbreak. Faktor, 11(2024), 284–294. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/fjik.v11i3.18479 DOI: 10.30998/fjik.v11i3.18479