1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol 8 (2026) Issue 1
  4. Articles

The Effect of Acidity on the Growth and Chlorophyll a Content of Latoh (Caulerpa racemosa)

Abstract

Caulerpa racemosa is an edible green macroalga rich in chlorophyll. pH is a key environmental factor influencing seaweed performance, including growth and chlorophyll content. This study tested how pH affects growth and chlorophyll a in C. racemosa and identified the optimal pH. Experiments were conducted from November 2024 to January 2025 at the Center for Brackish Water Aquaculture (BBPBAP), Jepara, Central Java, using a completely randomised design with four treatments and three replicates: P0 (ambient pH), P1 (pH 8.25), P2 (pH 8.00), and P3 (pH 7.75). The highest biomass gain occurred at pH 8.25 (P1: 133.47 g), with the greatest specific growth rate also at pH 8.25 (P1: 3.02 % day-¹). The highest chlorophyll a content was observed under ambient pH (P0: 303.61 ± 5.56 mg L-¹). pH significantly affected both growth and chlorophyll a of C. racemosa (ANOVA, P < 0.05). Water-quality variables (dissolved oxygen, temperature, salinity, light intensity, nitrate, and phosphate) remained within ranges suitable for C. racemosa throughout the study.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Caulerpa racemosa is a type of seaweed that contains chlorophyll and is known as sea grapes or, among the people, called "latoh". C. racemosa is edible as a vegetable or salad food. Seaweed type C. racemosa is classified into the group of green algae (Chlorophyta), which is one of the economically valuable resources. Compared to otherseaweeds, C.racemosa has higher nutritional content and antioxidant activity, including carbohydrates, crude fiber, protein, and minerals, but is low in fat [1-3]. As a raw material, C. racemosa has a higher phenol content, antioxidant activity, and broader therapeutic potential, including as a cosmetic ingredient, anticancer agent, diabetes therapy, and immunomodulator. In addition, C. racemosa also has three pigment contents: carotenoids, chlorophyll, and phycocyanin [4-6]. The chlorophyll pigment in C. racemosa makes it green and is used in photosynthesis. Chlorophyll is widely used in the household industry as a natural coloring agent for food and beverages, as a medicinal ingredient, as a sensitizing agent (for cancer therapy), as a bioinsecticide, and as a natural dye. It can be an antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-mutagenic [7- 9].

Ocean acidification is a phenomenon in which the acidity

level of seawater changes below normal. The leading cause is global warming. According to the IPCC [10], the burning of fossil fuels will continue in the next 100 years, which can cause an ocean pH decrease to 7.5. Ocean acidification has a negative impact of 67% on marine biota, one of which is seaweed's growth and biological activity [11-13].

pH is one of the factors that causes the loss of chlorophyll a. Chlorophyll, as a pigment responsible for the formation of green pigment, is unstable to exposure to heat, acid, light, pH, and oxygen [14]. Acidification (ocean acidification) has an impact on the loss of magnesium (Mg), so that there will be a change in color in seagrass leaves [15]. Excessive or insufficient pH content inhibits the growth of seaweed [16]. Chlorophyll is readily degraded by enzymatic reactions, acidic conditions, and the presence of oxygen [17-18]. Therefore, it is necessary to research the effect of water pH and HCl addition on the growth and chlorophyll a content of latoh (C. racemosa).

Research related to acidification using HCl (Hydrogen Chloride) has been conducted by Rifandi et al. [19] on brown seaweed Sargassum sp. and Ansar et al. [20] on red seaweed Gracilaria changii. However, research on the difference in pH on the growth and chlorophyll a content of C. racemosa using

HCl has never been conducted, so it is necessary to research the effect of water pH with the addition of HCl on the growth and chlorophyll a content of C. racemosa.

2. Methodology

2.1 Materials

Twelve 15-L containers; 15-cm glass dropper pipettes (VMA-70001-01238) for HCl application; pH meter; DO meter; refractometer; lux meter; UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-1800) with quartz cuvettes. C. racemosa thalli sourced from BBPBAP Jepara (total 600 g; 50 g per container) [21]; hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%, 1 L) for pH adjustment; dissolved inorganic nutrients with N:P = 6:1 used as fertilizer [22]; sandy-mud substrate [23].

2.2. Experimental design

A completely randomized design (CRD) with four pH treatments and three replicates was used over 43 days. Target pH levels followed IPCC guidance [10]: P0, ambient pH 9.0–9.3 (field condition); P1, pH 8.25; P2, pH 8.00; P3, pH 7.75.

2.3. Cultivation of the seagrapes

Seedstock, containers, and media were prepared; sandy mud was the substrate [23]. Salinity, light intensity, and dissolved oxygen (DO) were measured daily; temperature and DO were measured in the morning and afternoon. pH was checked three times daily (morning, midday, evening) and adjusted by dripping HCl to maintain targets. Nitrate and phosphate were measured at the end of the experiment.

2.4. Parameters

2.4.1 Morphology

Morphology of C. racemosa (thallus and ramuli) was recorded at day 0 and day 43 by visual assessment of thallus shape/texture and ramuli color. Ramuli color was quantified as Hue using the HSV (hue–saturation–value) color model [24–27].

2.4.2 Absolute Growth

Absolute Growth: The absolute growth of seaweed measured at the beginning and end of the study can be calculated using the following formula, according to Zonneveld [28]:

\[\Delta W = Wt - W0\]

Note: \(\Delta W\) : Absolute growth in weight (g)

Wt : Weight at the time of measurement (g)

W0 : Initial weight (g)

2.4.3 Specific Growth Rate

The specific growth rate of seaweed is calculated using the following formula [29]:

\[SGR = \frac{(lnWt - lnW0)}{t} \times 100\%\]

Where: SGR : Specific Growth Rate (% day-1)

W0 : Initial seaweed weight (g) Wt : Final seaweed weight (g) t : Maintenance Time (days)

2.4.4 Chlorophyll a content

Chlorophyll a was determined spectrophotometrically [30-31]. Absorbance of the extract was read at 663 and 645 nm, and chlorophyll a (Ca in mg g<sup>-1</sup> FW) computed by Arnon's equation [32]:

Ca = \[[12.7 \times A663 - 2.69 \times A645]x \frac{V}{1000} x \frac{1}{W}\]

Where: V: extract volume (mL) W: sample mass (g)

2.4.5 Water Quality

Daily measurements: salinity (refractometer), light intensity (lux meter), pH (pH meter; morning and afternoon), DO, and temperature (DO meter; morning and afternoon). Nitrate and phosphate were analyzed at the end by spectrophotometry following SNI 19-6964.7:2003; results expressed as mg \(L^{-1}\) [33].

2.5 Data Analysis

One-way ANOVA analyzed data; when significant, Duncan's multiple range test was applied (\(\alpha\) = 0.05). Analyses were performed in SPSS v21.0. Morphology and water-quality data were summarized descriptively against seaweed-culture suitability criteria.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1 Morphology Test

The results of the observations are presented in changes in the thallus's shape, color, and texture at the beginning and end of the observation. The results of morphological observations are shown in Table 1.

After 43 days of maintenance, C. racemosa under different pH treatments did not show morphological changes in shape or texture, as shown in Table 1. All treatments showed morphology, namely ramuli in the form of small circles, tightly packed and regularly covering the stolon branches; between fronds, spaced and longer. In the treatment in this study, the texture became brittle, which is thought to be due to continuous dripping of HCl. Fronds are part of the C. racemosa seaweed plant in the form of small green round stems with a soft to hard texture [34]. Seaweed stolons become longer than before the maintenance period, a phenomenon influenced by age and water quality [35].

Table 1.MorphologyofC.racemosa
Treatment (pH)Initial ObservationEnd of Observation
P0S: Fronds are clustered and short
H(f): 90 °
H(s): 92 °
T: Chewy and dense
S: Fronds are spaced and long
H(f): 74°
H(s): 91 °
T: Chewy and dense
P1S: Fronds are clustered and short
H(f): 92 °
H(s): 90 °
T: Chewy and dense
S: Fronds are spaced and long
H(f): 72°
H(s): 92 °
T: Chewy and dense
P2S: Fronds are clustered and short
H(f): 91 °
H(s): 91 °
T: Chewy and soft
S: Fronds are spaced and long
H(f): 71°
H(s): 91 °
T: Chewy and dense
P3S: Fronds are clustered and short
H(f): 90 °
H(s): 91 °
S: Fronds are spaced and long
H(f): 69°
H(s): 93 °
T: Chewy and denseQ: Many parts are fragile

S:Shapeofthefronds,H(f):Hueofthefronds,H(s):Hueofthestolon,T:Textureofthe stolon

The difference in pH in this study resulted in morphological changes in the color of C. racemosa ramuli, the color of the ramuli in each treatment was greenish yellow. Naturally, C. racemosa seaweed ranges from light green to dark green. The color of the Caulerpa sp thallus is green like green leaves, so it is grouped into green algae (Chlorophyceae). Caulerpa sp. contains chlorophyll a and b pigments, like those in plants' green leaves, which cause C. racemosa seaweed to be green [1]. Based on the Hue value at the beginning of the observation of C. racemosa, it was between 90° - 92°. This value indicates that C. racemosa is green. Epifania and Eko [36] stated that a Hue value of 75°-105° indicates a yellowish-green color.

Based on Table 1, a comparison of Hue values was made in each treatment. The Hue color value in the ramuli section in each treatment decreased (turned yellow) along with the low pH. The Hue value results in the P0 treatment (natural pH) showed the highest Hue value of 74°. Followed by P1 (pH 8), which is 72°, and P2 (pH 8.25) has a Hue value of 71°. P3 (pH 7.75) has the lowest Hue value of 69°. The ramuli in the P3 treatment (pH 7.75) are white from the tips to the middle of the fronds. Yellow is the type of colour at a degree of 60° - 90° [36]. This shows that lower water pH causes morphological changes in C. racemosa, especially in the color of the ramuli, which bleach. The color change is thought to be due to the chlorophyll a content in C.racemosa being degraded by a decreased pH. Chlorophyll is very susceptible to degradation by various external factors [37].

3.2 Absolute Growth

Absolute growth differed among pH treatments (Fig. 1). The highest biomass gain occurred at pH 8.25 (P1: 133.47 g), followed by pH 8.00 (P2: 109.7±3.7 g) and ambient pH ~9.0–9.3 (P0: 81.4 ± 5.4 g). The lowest growth was at pH

7.75 (P3: 57.17±2.7 g). Thus, growth peaked at moderately alkaline conditions (P1), consistent with reports that Caulerpa grows best at seawater pH ~8.0–8.7 [38,39].

In P3 (pH 7.75), early mortality occurred during the first week, and surviving thalli showed pronounced stolon elongation and sparse ramuli, likely reducing biomass accumulation [40,41]. Prior studies similarly report reduced growth of Caulerpa spp. at lower pH [16,42].

3.3 Specific Growth Rate (SGR)

Treatment of C. racemosa at different pH levels in treatments P1 and P2) yielded a reasonable specific growth rate compared to treatments P0 and P3. Based on Figure 2, the value of the specific growth rate of C. racemosa, the treatment with the highest growth occurred in P1 with pH 8.25 (3.02 ± 0.1% / day) followed by treatment P2 with pH 8 (2.70 ± 0.05% / day), treatment P0 with natural pH (2.25 ± 0.1% / day), then the lowest growth occurred in treatment P3 pH 7.75 (1.77% ± 0.06% / day).

The results of the Anova statistical analysis show that different pH treatments in C. racemosa cultivation affect the specific growth rate of C. racemosa seaweed (P <0.05). The specific growth rate in treatments P0-P2 ranged from 2.25 to 3.02%/day. These results indicate an optimal specific growth rate, supported by Damayanti et al. [43], who state that daily growth rates exceeding 2% / day are considered feasible in seaweed cultivation. Meanwhile, in treatment P3, growth is not optimal because the specific growth rate does not reach 2%, which is only 1.77% day-1 .

The low growth of C. racemosa seaweed in the P3 treatment is thought to be because C. racemosa cannot adapt to an environment with a lower pH (pH 7.75), which inhibits the growth of seaweed. During the maintenance period, the death

12

Figure 1.Absolute growth ofC.racemosa under different acidity conditions

2

Figure 2.Specific growth rate ofC. racemosa under different acidity

of C. racemosa at the beginning of maintenance was higher than its growth. According to Rendiansyah et al. [44], one cause of seaweed growth decline is that the process of acclimating seaweed to a controlled environment is not optimal, leading to seaweed death at the beginning of the study and reduced growth.

3.4 Chlorophyll a content

ANOVA showed a significant effect of pH on chlorophyll a in C. racemosa (ANOVA, P < 0.05; Fig. 3). Mean (± SD) chlorophyll-a by treatment was: P0, ambient pH 9.0–9.3 = 303.61 ± 5.56 mg L- ¹; P1, pH 8.25 = 262.54 ± 15.84 mg L- ¹; P2, pH 8.00 = 246.67 ± 16.57 mg L- ¹; P3, pH 7.75 = 248.11 ± 18.56 mg L- ¹. Overall, chlorophyll a decreased as pH declined (P0 > P1 > P2 ≈ P3; Duncan, α = 0.05).

The decrease in chlorophyll a content is thought to be due to stress induced by changes in environmental pH. Low pH decreases chlorophyll a content, allegedly because chlorophyll is readily degraded at low pH. According to Andika [15], acidification increases the loss of magnesium (Mg), leading to changes in seagrass leaf colour. Chlorophyll a is a natural chemical compound that has a structure with a Magnesium (Mg) atomic nucleus [45].

Although P0 had the highest chlorophyll a, the most significant biomass gain occurred at P1 (pH 8.25), indicating that chlorophyll a alone did not dictate growth under these conditions. Lower pH is consistent with reduced chlorophyll stability and content in green macroalgae, contributing to the yellowing/bleaching of ramuli observed at lower pH. The solution's acidity significantly affects chlorophyll values

9

Figure 3.Chlorophyll a content ofC. racemosa under different acidity conditions

content. However, the lowest pH in this study (pH 7.75) did not cause chlorophyll a degradation to be damaged because it only decreased by 14-19%. In the study of Puspita et al. [37], chlorophyll degradation can reduce the percentage of chlorophyll content by 40-80% due to external factors, so that the chlorophyll a content in this study is still optimal to support growth with the least damage.

3.5 Water Quality

Water quality measurements were carried out daily, with parameters including salinity, light intensity, pH, DO, temperature, nitrate, and phosphate. Overall, it can be concluded that the water quality during the study was within a range that C. racemosa could still tolerate. Complete data are presented in Table 2.

In this study, the temperature range obtained showed an average result of 28.9–31 °C, which is still in a good range for growth; however, daily temperature fluctuations may affect the growth rate. Supported by SNI data [48], the range of water temperatures for cultivating lawi-lawi seaweed (Caulerpa spp.) is 26 – 33 °C. This means that the water temperature in the maintenance medium is still within the range suitable for the growth of C. racemosa seaweed. The results of DO or dissolved oxygen measurements in all treatments ranged from 4. 9 to 6.9 mg/L. These results indicate a good range to support the growth of C. racemosa seaweed. This is in accordance with the procedure for cultivating lawi-lawi seaweed (Caulerpa spp.) in ponds > 3 mg/L [48].

The pH treatment levels in this study can still be tolerated by seaweed according to the statement that the pH suitable for seaweed growth is 6-9 [49]. Based on absolute growth measurements and specific growth rates, the best growth results were obtained in treatment P1 (pH 8.25). Treatments P0, P2 and P3 continued to experience growth of up to 2.25%, 2.70% and 1.77% because C. racemosa seaweed adapted to these pH conditions. Marine biota can tolerate a decrease in pH of 0.5 to 1.0 units; in lower pH, it interferes with photosynthesis, reduces coral calcification, and inhibits the growth of organisms [15]. The results of salinity measurements measured every day in the morning and evening ranged from 30-34 ppt in all treatments. The salinity range during the study period was still within the range that could be tolerated by C. racemosa seaweed, so that it could support the life of the seaweed. This is in accordance with the opinion of Pereira et al. [50], stating that seaweed generally lives in a salinity range of 25 - 40 ppt. Salinity for cultivating lawi-lawi seaweed (Caulerpa spp.) in ponds is 28 - 34 ppt [48].

The results of light intensity measurements were 402 - 2,861 lux. This indicates that the light intensity conditions in the maintenance of C. racemosa seaweed are still good for growth, as stated by Darmawati [41], that the range of light intensity values still suitable for seaweed growth is 133 - 3,253 lux. The results of nitrate measurements at the end of the study in all treatments ranged from (<0.001 - 0.032) mg /

L. Meanwhile, based on the results of monitoring the source at BBPBAP Jepara in November 2024, the nitrate content value was 0.127 mg / L. The nitrate value tends to decrease compared to the nitrate content in BBPBAP Jepara waters. This happens because seaweed can absorb nutrients (nitrate) very optimally. The decrease in nitrate and phosphate at the cultivation location was because seaweed absorbed nitrate and phosphate to support seaweed growth. Orthophosphate measurements show results ranging from <0.001 – 0.032 mg/L. The phosphate content in the study was low because the measurements were carried out at the end of maintenance. Based on the results of monitoring the source water and wastewater of BBPBAP Jepara in November 2024, the phosphate content in Jepara waters ranged from 0.023–0.086 mg/L. The decrease in phosphate content in the waters is thought to be due to it having been utilized by seaweed as an essential nutrient that plays a role in the photosynthesis process [51].

Table2.WaterQualityMeasurement

Water Quality
TreatmentpHDO
(mg/L)
Temperature
(℃)
Salinity
(ppt)
Light
Intensity (
Lux )
Nitrate*
(mg/L)
Phosphate*
(mg/L)
P09 – 9.34.9–6.928.9–3130470–26360.0320.016
P18.255.1–6.928.9–3130–34468–2595<0.001<0.001
P284.8–6.828.9–3130–34420–28610.005<0.001
P37.755.7–6.528.9–3130–34402–27530.0050.032
Optimal6.5-9 (a)>3 (b)26–32 (a)28 – 34 (b)132–3252 (c)0.9 - 5 (b)0.2 – 0.9 (b)

(a) SNI [47]; (b) SNI [48]; (c) Darmawati [41]. (*) Measurements were taken at the end of the study

4. Conclusion

Seawater pH significantly affected growth and chlorophyll a of C. racemosa (ANOVA, P < 0.05). Growth was highest at pH 8.25 (P1), with ΔW = 133.47 ± 9.10 g and SGR = 3.02 ± 0.10% day- ¹ , whereas chlorophyll-a was greatest at ambient pH 9.0–9.3 (P0: 303.61 ± 5.56 mg L- ¹). Thus, moderately alkaline conditions (~8.25) optimize biomass accumulation, while ambient field pH maximizes chlorophyll a.

Research Intelligence

Data from OpenAlex ↗

Metrics

0.00
FWCIfield-weighted
8th
Percentilevs same year + field
Article
Work type
Open Access

Semantic Profile AI-classified research signals

Institution Network

References

  1. ] Tapotubun AM, Theodora EAA, Matrutty, Jhohan R, Elizabeth JT, Eirene GF, Meigy NM, Welly AR, Beni S, Fredrik R. Seaweed Caulerpa sp position as functional food. MSFT [Internet]. 2020; 517,1-8. doi: 10.1088/1755- 1315/517/1/012021 DOI: 10.1088/1755-
  2. ] Windarto S, Kamaludin DM, Bella W, Sarjito, Pinandoyo, Susilowati T, Haditomo AHC, Harwanto D. Effect of coconut (Cocos nucifera) water, and aqueous extract of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) sprouts and Moringa (Moringa oleifera) leaf on the growth and nutrition of Caulerpa racemosa. International Journal of Aquatic Biology [Internet]. 2023; 11(6), 513–522. doi: 10.22034/ ijab.v11i6.2044
  3. ] Windarto S, Herawati VE, Wijaya YJ, Indriati DA, Rachmasari Y, Elfitasari T. Exploring the Physicochemical Properties and Nutritional Value of Abundant Seaweed Species Along the Jepara Coast, Indonesia. Thalassas [Internet]. 2025; 41, 82. Available from: doi: 10.1007/ s41208-025-00846-y
  4. ] Cikoš A, Šubarić D, Roje M, Babić J, Jerković I, Jokić S. Recent advances on macroalgal pigments and their biological activities (2016–2021). Algal Research [Internet]. 2022; 65, 102748. doi: 10.1016/j. algal.2022.102748 DOI: 10.1016/j
  5. ] Muñoz-Miranda LA, Iñiguez-Moreno M. An extensive review of marine pigments: Sources, biotechnological applications, and sustainability. Aquatic Sciences [Internet]. 2023; 85(3), 68. doi: 10.1007/s00027-023- DOI: 10.1007/s00027-023-
  6. -8
  7. ] Manzoor MF, Afraz MT, Yılmaz BB, Adil M, Arshad N, Goksen G, Ali M, Zeng X. Recent progress in natural seaweed pigments: Green extraction, health- promoting activities, techno-functional properties and role in intelligent food packaging. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research [Internet]. 2024; 15, 100991. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.100991 DOI: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.100991
  8. ] Rahman SM, Neaz S, Alam MM, Nur J. Hypolipidemic activity of ethanolic extract of Caulerpa racemosa. BIRDEM Medical Journal [Internet]. 2019; 9(3), 197-
  9. doi: 10.3329/birdem.v9i3.43080 DOI: 10.3329/birdem.v9i3.43080
  10. ] Ebrahimi P, Shokramraji Z, Tavakkoli S, Mihaylova D,
  11. Lante A. Chlorophylls as Natural Bioactive Compounds Existing in Food By-Products: A Critical Review. Plants [Internet]. 2023; 12(7), 1533. doi: 10.3390/ plants12071533
  12. ] Martins T, Barros AN, Rosa E, Antunes L. Enhancing Health Benefits through Chlorophylls and Chlorophyll- Rich Agro-Food: A Comprehensive Review. Molecules [Internet]. 2023; 28(14), 5344. doi: 10.3390/
  13. molecules28145344
  14. ] IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [CoreWriting Team, R. K. Pachauri and
  15. L. A. Meyer (eds.)] 2014.151 pp.
  16. ] Gutow L, Mohammed MR, Kevin B, Reinhard S, Inka B, Christian W. Ocean acidification affects the growth but not nutritional quality of seaweed Fucus vesiculosus (Phaeophyceae, Fucales). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology [Internet]. 2014; 453, 84-
  17. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2014.01.005 DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2014.01.005
  18. ] Kumar JGS, Umamaheswari S, Kavimani S dan Ilavarasan R. Pharmacological potential of green algae Caulerpa: A review. International Journal Pharmacy Science and Research [Internet]. 2019; 10 (3), 1014-
  19. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.10(3).1014-24 DOI: 10.13040/ijpsr.0975-8232.10(3
  20. ] Tito KC, Susilo E. Pengasaman Laut Di Perairan Indonesia. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Research [Internet]. 2021; 5(2), 419-426. doi: 10.21776/ ub.jfmr.2021.005.02.29
  21. ] Wanda P, Wibowo MA, Destiarti L. Enkapsulasi dan Uji Stabilitas Ekstrak Metanol Daun Pepaya (Carica papaya. Linn). JK [Internet]. 2017; 6(1), 25–29.
  22. ] Andika Y, Kawaroe M, Effendi H, Zamani NP. Pengaruh Kondisi pH Terhadap Respons Fisiologis Daun Lamun Jenis Cymodocea rotundata. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kelautan Tropis [Internet]. 2020; 12(2), 487- 495. doi: 10.29244/jitkt.v12i2.21632 DOI: 10.29244/jitkt.v12i2.21632
  23. ] Alda H, Ansar M, Arbitm NIS. Effect Different pH On Growth Performance Gracilaria changii. Jurnal Agribisnis [Internet]. 2022; 1(1), 41-50. doi: 10.33830/Agridev.v1i1.2891.2022 DOI: 10.33830/agridev.v1i1.2891.2022
  24. ] Koca N, Karadeniz F, Burdurlu HS. Effect of pH on chlorophyll degradation and colour loss in blanched green peas. Food Chemistry [Internet]. 2006; 100(2), 609-615. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.09.079 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.09.079
  25. ] Yilmaz C, Gokmen V. Chlorophyll. In Encyclopedia of Food and Health. Caballero B, Finglas PM, Toldra F. Waltham (US): Academic Press; 2016.
  26. ] Rifandi RA, Gunawan WS, Ali R. Pengaruh Konsentrasi Asam Klorida (HCl) Terhadap Mutu Alginat Rumput Laut Coklat Sargassum sp. Dari Perairan Teluk Awur Kab.Jepara Dan Poktunggal Kab. Gunungkidul. Journal Of Marine Research [Internet]. 2014; 3(4), 676-684. doi: 10.14710/jmr.v3i4.11430 DOI: 10.14710/jmr.v3i4.11430
  27. ] Lee WK, Lim YY, Ho CL. pH affects growth, physiology and agar properties of agarophyte Gracilaria changii (Rhodophyta) under low light intensity from Morib, Malaysia. Regional Studies in Marine Science [Internet]. 2019; 30, 100738. doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2019.100738 DOI: 10.1016/j.rsma.2019.100738
  28. ] Windarto S, Susilowati T, Haditomo AHC, Harwanto
  29. D. Effect of exogenous natural plant growth regulators (PGRs) on the morphology, growth, and nutrient of sea grapes (Caulerpa racemosa). Aquaculture International [Internet]. 2024; 32, 3545–3562. doi: 10.1007/s10499- DOI: 10.1007/s10499-
  30. -01337-8
  31. ] Harwanto D, Saputro P, Susilowati T, Haditomo AHC, Windarto S. Effect of different N:P ratios application on the cultivation media for the growth and fiber content of Calulerpa racemosa reared in tarpaulin ponds. AACL Bioflux [Internet]. 2020; 13(5) 3117 – 3125.
  32. ] Windarto S, Prastiwahyudi AH, Susilowati T, Haditomo AHC, Harwanto D. Effect of Different Substrates on Growth and Protein Content of Caulerpa racemosa. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences [Internet]. 2021; 48(7): 266–275.
  33. ] Dini PSR, Susanto AB, Rini P. Pengaruh Konsentrasi Pupuk Cair Terhadap Pertumbuhan Dan Kandungan Klorofil-a Rumput Laut Gracilaria verrucosa (Harvey). Journal of Marine Research. 2021; 10(3): 327-332. doi: 10.14710/jmr.v10i3.29183 DOI: 10.14710/jmr.v10i3.29183
  34. ] Darson K, Yandhika SAG, Abd R. Citra Identifikasi Warna dengan Metode Nilai Hue Secara Realtime Berbasis Web Camera dan Raspberry Pi. Seminar Nasional Teknik Elektro, Sistem Informasi, dan Teknik Informatika [Internet]. 2023; 41-46. doi: 10.31284/p. snestik.2023.4100 DOI: 10.31284/p
  35. ] Utami M, Putra ED. Deteksi Objek Kualitas Daun Sawi Menggunakan Metode HSV Color dan Color Blob. JUSIBI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Bisnis) [Internet]. 2023; 5(2): 85–93.
  36. ] Pandiangan HSM. Segmentasi Citra Untuk Pencarian Kode Warna Cat Menggunakan Metode Thershold Hsv. Bulletin of Information Technology (BIT) [Internet]. 2020; 1(3), 134–143.
  37. ] Zonneveld N, Huisman EA, Boon JH. Prinsip-pinsip Budidaya Ikan. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 1991.
  38. ] Effendie MI. Metode Biologi Perikanan. Bogor: Yayasan Dewi Sri Bogor; 1979. 112p.
  39. ] Osorio C, Susana M, Juliana P, Silvia B, Filpa BP, Rita CA, Beatriz PM, Oliveira P. Pigments Content (Chlorophylls, Fucoxanthin and Phycobiliproteins) of Different Commercial Dried Algae. Separation [Internet]. 2013; 7(33): 1-14. doi: 10.3390/separations7020033 DOI: 10.3390/separations7020033
  40. ] Syad AN, Pandian S, Kasi PD. Seaweeds as nutritional supplements: Analysis of nutritional profile,
  41. physicochemical properties and proximate composition of G. acerosa and S. wightii. Biomedicine & Preventive Nutrition [Internet]. 2013; (3):139–144. doi: 10.1016/j. bionut.2012.12.002 DOI: 10.1016/j
  42. ] Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology [Internet]. 1949; 24(1), 1. doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1 DOI: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1
  43. ] SNI 8567:2018. Penentuan kadar fosfat (PO 3-) pada air budidaya perikanan payau dan laut dengan metode spektrofotometri molibdat-asam askorbat.
  44. ] Stuthmann LE, Beatrice S, Springer K, Kunzmann A. Sea grapes (Caulerpa lentillifera J. Agardh, Chlorophyta) for human use: Structured review on recent research in cultivation, nutritional value, and post-harvest management. Journal of Applied Phycology [Internet]. 2023; 2957–2983. doi: 10.1007/s10811-023-03031-x DOI: 10.1007/s10811-023-03031-x
  45. ] Estrada JL, Bautista NS, Dionisio-sese ML. Morphological variation of two common sea grapes (Caulerpa lentillifera and Caulerpa racemosa) from selected regions in the Philippines. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity [Internet]. 2020; 21(5), 1823–
  46. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d210508 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d210508
  47. ] Epifania VC, Eko S. Pencarian File Gambar Berdasarkan Dominasi Warna. Jurnal Buana Informatika [Internet]. 2011; 2(1),1-10. doi: 10.24002/jbi.v2i1.303 DOI: 10.24002/jbi.v2i1.303
  48. ] Puspita D, Windu M, Arisia PSM. Pengaruh Konsentrasi Klorofil Krim Sup Caulerpa racemosa yang Dikeringkan Dengan Vacuum Drying Oven. Jurnal Teknologi Pangan dan Gizi [Internet]. 2021; 20(2), 94-101. doi: 10.33508/ jtpg.v20i2.3045/
  49. ] Susilowati A, Mulyawan AE, Yaqin K, Rahim SW. Kualitas air dan unsur hara pada pemeliharaan Caulerpa lentilifera dengan menggunakan pupuk kascing. Prosiding Seminar Nasional. 2017; 03, 275–282.
  50. ] Umam K, Arisandi A. Pertumbuhan Rumput Laut Eucheuma cottonii Pada Jarak Pantai yang Berbeda Di Desa Aengdake, Kabupaten Sumenep. Juvenil: Jurnal Ilmiah Kelautan dan Perikanan [Internet]. 2021; 2(2),115-124. doi: 10.21107/juvenil.v2i2.10672 DOI: 10.21107/juvenil.v2i2.10672
  51. ] Nadlir A, Susilowati T, Adi K, Harwanto D, Haditomo AHC, Windarto S. Production Performance of Gracilaria verrucosa Using Verticulture Method with Various Wide Planting Area in Karimunjawa. Omni-Akuatika [Internet]. 2019; 15(1), 47-58. doi: 10.20884/1.oa.2019.15.1.671 DOI: 10.20884/1.oa.2019.15.1.671
  52. ] Darmawati, Rahmi JEA. Optimasi Pertumbuhan Caulerpa sp Yang Dibudidayakan Dengan Kedalaman Yang Berbeda di Perairan Laguruda Kabupaten Takalar. Octopus: Jurnal Ilmu Perikanan [Internet]. 2016; 5, 435–
  53. ] Taise A, Krieger E, Bury SJ, Christopher EC. Physiological responses of Caulerpa spp. (with different dissolved inorganic carbon physiologies) to ocean acidification. New Zealand Journal of Botany [Internet].
  54. ; 1-25. doi: 10.1080/0028825X.2023.2289432 DOI: 10.1080/0028825x.2023.2289432
  55. ] Damayanti T, Riris A, Fauziyah. Laju Pertumbuhan Rumput Laut Caulerpa racemosa Dengan Bobot Bibit Awal Berbeda Menggunakan Metode Rakit Apung dan Long Line Di PerairanTeluk Hurun, Lampung. Maspari Journal [Internet]. 2019; 11(1), 17 – 22.
  56. ] Rendiansyah R, Arbit NIS, Saharuddin S. Pengaruh Pemberian Pupuk Urea Dengan Dosis Berbeda Terhadap Pertumbuhan Rumput Laut (Caulerpa lentillifera). Jurnal Teknologi Perikanan Dan Kelautan [Internet]. 2024; 15(1), 11-20. doi: 10.24319/jtpk.15.11-20 DOI: 10.24319/jtpk.15.11-20
  57. ] Dimara L, Popy ILA, Efray W. Fotodegradasi, Uji pH dan Kandungan in Vivo Pigmen Klorofil-a Lamun Thalasia hemprichii. Jurnal Ilmu Kelautan dan Perikanan Papua [Internet]. 2018; 1(2), 76-83. doi: 10.31957/acr.v1i2.932 DOI: 10.31957/acr.v1i2.932
  58. ] Sasadara MMV, Ni Made DMWN, Putu ESK, Erna C, Ni Luh KAAD. Pengaruh Pemilihan Pelarut dalam Ekstraksi Klorofil pada Rumput Laut Gracilaria sp. dan Caulerpa sp. Segar dan Kering. Jurnal Ilmiah Medicamento [Internet]. 2023; 9(1), 22-28. doi: 10.36733/medicamento.v9i1.5344 DOI: 10.36733/medicamento.v9i1.5344
  59. ] SNI 8554: 2018 Produksi Rumput Laut Lawi-Lawi (Caulerpa spp.) di Tambak.
  60. ] SNI 9049:2022 Bibit Rumput Laut Untuk Budidaya. [49.] Fauziah F. 2017. Pertumbuhan Sargassum Sp. Pada Tipe Habitat Dan Berat Koloni Berbeda Di Pantai Sakera Bintan. Skripsi. Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji. Tanjung Pinang.
  61. ] Pereira DT, Simioni C, Filipin EP, Bouvie F, Ramlov F, Maraschin M, Bouzon ZL, Schmidt C. Effects of salinity on the physiology of the red macroalga, Acanthophora spicifera (Rhodophyta, Ceramiales). Acta Botanica Brasilica [Internet]. 2017; 31 (4), 555-565. doi: 10.1590/0102-33062017abb0059 DOI: 10.1590/0102-33062017abb0059
  62. ] Azizah MN, Rahman A, Balubi AM. Pengaruh Jarak Tanam Bibit yang Berbeda Terhadap Kandungan Agar Rumput Laut (Gracilaria verrucosa) Menggunakan Metode Longline di Tambak. Jurnal Media Akuatika [Internet]. 2018; 3(1), 556-563. doi: 10.33772/jma. v3i1.4379 DOI: 10.33772/jma